PDF가 표시되지 않으면 여기를 클릭하여 다운로드

1
김건우(2022), “챗봇 이루다를 통해 본 인공지능윤리의 근본 문제,” 횡단인문학, 제10호, pp.39-76. (Kim, K. W.(2022), “Fundamental Problems of AI Ethics Through the Chatbot Iruda,” Transdisciplinary Humanities, 10, pp.39-76.) Google Scholar ›
2
김희주, 이종은, 유현정(2025), “시장은 기업의 윤리 수준에 관심이 있는가?,” 경영학연구, 제54권 2호, pp.413-449. (Kim, H. J., Lee, J. E., and Yu, H. J.(2025), “Does the Market Care about a Firm's Ethics Level?,” Korea Management Review, 54(2), pp.413-449.) Google Scholar ›
3
국가인권위원회법(2024), 법률 제20558호, 국가법령정보센터. (National Human Rights Commission Act(2024), Act No. 20558, Korean Law Information Center.) Google Scholar ›
4
대한민국 법제처(2025), 인공지능 발전과 신뢰 기반 조성 등에 관한 기본법(법률 제20676호, 2025. 1. 21., 시행 2026. 1. 22.), 국가법령정보센터, https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsInfoP.do?lsId=014820&ancYnChk=0#0000. (Ministry of Government Legislation, Republic of Korea(2025), Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and Establishment of Trust(Act No. 20676, enacted January 21, 2025, effective January 22, 2026), Korean Law Information Center, https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsInfoP.do?lsId=014820&ancYnChk=0#0000.) Google Scholar ›
5
양성평등기본법(2025), 법률 제21275호, 국가법령정보센터, https://www.law.go.kr/법령/양성평등기본법. (Framework Act on Gender Equality(2025), Act No. 21275, Korean Law Information Center,https://www.law.go.kr/법령/양성평등기본법.) Google Scholar ›
6
윤민범, 김재희, 김희웅(2025), “경영학계 AI 학술 연구의 공백 탐색: 산업 트렌드 기반 비교 분석,” 경영학연구, 제54권 6호, pp.1459-1483. (Yoon, M. B., Kim, J. H., and Kim, H. W.(2025), “Exploring Gaps in AI Academic Research in Business Studies: Comparative Analysis Based on Industry Trends,” Korea Management Review, 54(6), pp.1459-1483.) Google Scholar ›
7
이중학, 김성준, 윤명훈, 남주현(2025), “AI와 인간이 공존하는 조직: 액터-네트워크 이론 관점에서 본 HR 역할의 진화,” 경영학연구, 제54권 6호, pp.1541 -1561. (Lee, J. H., Kim, S. J., Yoon, M. H., and Nam, J. H.(2025), “Organizations Where AI and Humans Coexist: The Evolution of HR Roles from an Actor-Network Theory Perspective,” Korea Management Review, 54(6), pp.1541-1561.) Google Scholar ›
8
Anthis, J. R., Pauketat, J. V. T., Ladak, A., and Manoli, A.(2025), Perceptions of sentient AI and other digital minds: Evidence from the AI, Morality, and Sentience (AIMS) survey. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Article 408). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713329. Google Scholar ›
9
Anthropic.(2026), Claude’s Constitution[PDF]. https://www.anthropic.com/constitution. Google Scholar ›
10
Arendt, H.(1958), The human condition. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar ›
11
Arendt, H.(1963), Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. Viking Press. Google Scholar ›
12
Ashforth, B. E., and Anand, V.(2003), The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, pp.1-52. Google Scholar ›
13
Bandura, A.(1977), Social learning theory. Prentice Hall. Google Scholar ›
14
Bandura, A.(1999), Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), pp.193-209. Google Scholar ›
15
Bandura, A.(2017), Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. In Recent developments in criminological theory, pp.135-152. Routledge. Google Scholar ›
16
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., and Tice, D. M.(2018), Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? In Self-regulation and self-control, pp.16-44. Routledge. Google Scholar ›
17
Batool, A., Zowghi, D., and Bano, M.(2025), AI governance: A systematic literature review. AI and Ethics, 5, pp.3265-3279. Google Scholar ›
18
Beauchamp, T. L., and Bowie, N. E.(1983), Ethical theory and business. Prentice Hall. Google Scholar ›
19
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., and Shmitchell, S.(2021, March), On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp.610-623. Google Scholar ›
20
Berkowitz, L.(1989), Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), pp.59-73. Google Scholar ›
21
Beu, D. S., and Buckley, M. R.(2004), This is war: How the politically astute achieve crimes of obedience through the use of moral disengagement. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(4), pp.551-568. Google Scholar ›
22
Brendel, A. B., Hildebrandt, F., Dennis, A. R., and Riquel, J.(2023), The paradoxical role of humanness in aggression toward conversational agents. Journal of Management Information Systems, 40(3), pp.883-913. Google Scholar ›
23
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., and Harrison, D. A.(2005), Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), pp.117-134. Google Scholar ›
24
Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., and Raymond, L. R.(2025), Generative AI at work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(2), pp.889-942. Google Scholar ›
25
Bryson, J. J.(2010), Robots should be slaves. In Close engagements with artificial companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issues, pp.63-74. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar ›
26
Calvino, F., Reijerink, J., and Samek, L.(2025), The effects of generative AI on productivity, innovation and entrepreneurship. OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers. Google Scholar ›
27
Cardon, P. W., and Marshall, B.(2024), Can AI be your teammate or friend? Frequent AI users are more likely to grant humanlike roles to AI. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 87(4), pp.654-669. Google Scholar ›
28
Chatterji, A., Deming, D. J., Engler, M., Posen, H. E., and Ziegler, H.(2025), How people use ChatGPT(NBER Working Paper No. 34255). National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar ›
29
Cohen, J., Ding, Y., Lesage, C., and Stolowy, H. (2010), Corporate fraud and managers’ behavior: Evidence from the press. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(Suppl 2), pp.271-315. Google Scholar ›
30
Cortina, L. M., and Areguin, M. A.(2021), Putting people down and pushing them out: Sexual harassment in the workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8(1), pp.285 -309. Google Scholar ›
31
Danaher, J.(2020), Welcoming robots into the moral circle: A defence of ethical behaviourism. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), pp.2023-2049. Google Scholar ›
32
De George, R. T.(1987), The status of business ethics: Past and future. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(3), pp.201-211. Google Scholar ›
33
Deloitte.(2025), 2025 Global human capital trends: Navigating the boundaryless world. Deloitte Insights. https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/insights/focus/human-capital-trends.html. Google Scholar ›
34
Demopoulos, A.(2025, September 9), The women in love with AI companions: ‘I vowed to my chatbot that I wouldn’t leave him’. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/sep/09/ai-chatbot-love-relationships. Google Scholar ›
35
De Visser, E. J., Monfort, S. S., McKendrick, R., Smith, M. A., McKnight, P. E., Krueger, F., and Parasuraman, R.(2016), Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22(3), pp.331-349. Google Scholar ›
36
Descartes, R.(2012), Principles of philosophy. Simon and Schuster. (Original work published 1644). Google Scholar ›
37
Drucker, P. F.(1981), What is “business ethics”? The Public Interest, 63, pp.18-36. Google Scholar ›
38
Earp, B. D., Mann, S. P., Aboy, M., Awad, E., Betzler, M., Botes, M., … and Clark, M. S.(2025), Relational norms for human-AI cooperation[Preprint]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12102. Google Scholar ›
39
Epley, N., Waytz, A., and Cacioppo, J. T.(2007), On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), pp.864-886. Google Scholar ›
40
Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., and Drasgow, F.(1995), Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), pp.425-445. Google Scholar ›
41
Fowler, S.(2021), Whistleblower: My unlikely journey to Silicon Valley and speaking out against injustice. Penguin. Google Scholar ›
42
Fox, S., and Spector, P. E.(1999), A model of work frustration-aggression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(6), pp.915-931. Google Scholar ›
43
García-Ruiz, P., and Rocchi, M.(2025), Can work be meaningful under algorithmic management? A MacIntyrean perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, pp.1-28. Google Scholar ›
44
Gaudiello, I., Lefort, S., and Zibetti, E.(2015), The ontological and functional status of robots: How firm our representations are?. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, pp.259 -273. Google Scholar ›
45
Gino, F., and Bazerman, M. H.(2009), When misconduct goes unnoticed: The acceptability of gradual erosion in others’ unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), pp.708-719. Google Scholar ›
46
Gkinko, L., and Elbanna, A.(2023), The appropriation of conversational AI in the workplace: A taxonomy of AI chatbot users. International Journal of Information Management, 69, 102568. Google Scholar ›
47
Glikson, E., and Woolley, A. W.(2020), Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), pp.627-660. Google Scholar ›
48
Godlovitch, R., Godlovitch, S., and Harris, J. (Eds.).(1971), Animals, men and morals: An enquiry into the maltreatment of non-humans. Victor Gollancz. Google Scholar ›
49
Goldhagen, D. J.(2007), Hitler’s willing executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. Vintage. Google Scholar ›
50
Grant, R. M., and Visconti, M.(2006), The strategic background to corporate accounting scandals. Long Range Planning, 39(4), pp.361-383. Google Scholar ›
51
Gunkel, D. J.(2012), The machine question: Critical perspectives on AI, robots, and ethics. MIT Press. Google Scholar ›
52
Haidt, J.(2001), The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), pp.814-834. Google Scholar ›
53
Hamilton, M. A.(2012), Verbal aggression: Understanding the psychological antecedents and social consequences. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(1), pp.5-12. Google Scholar ›
54
Haslam, N.(2006), Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), pp.252-264. Google Scholar ›
55
Harris, J., and Anthis, J. R.(2021), The moral consideration of artificial entities: a literature review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(4), 53. Google Scholar ›
56
Heyder, T., Passlack, N., and Posegga, O.(2023), Ethical management of human-AI interaction: Theory development review. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 32(3), 101772. Google Scholar ›
57
Hicks, M. T., Humphries, J., and Slater, J. (2024), ChatGPT is bullshit. Ethics and Information Technology, 26(2), pp.1-10. Google Scholar ›
58
Johnson, C.(2003), Enron’s ethical collapse: Lessons for leadership educators. Journal of Leadership Education, 2(1), pp.45-56. Google Scholar ›
59
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., and Christin, A.(2020), Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), pp.366-410. Google Scholar ›
60
Koh, J.(2023), “Date me date me”: AI chatbot interactions as a resource for the online construction of masculinity. Discourse, Context and Media, 52, 100681. Google Scholar ›
61
Kist, C., Nicol, E., and Chavula, C.(2025), Chatbot abuse typologies: a scoping review. Mensch und Computer 2025: Digital Diversity. Google Scholar ›
62
Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., and Sheep, M. L.(2009), Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), pp.704-730. Google Scholar ›
63
LeBlanc, M. M., and Kelloway, E. K.(2002), Predictors and outcomes of workplace violence and aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), pp.444-453. Google Scholar ›
64
Leroy, S.(2009), Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), pp.168-181. Google Scholar ›
65
Levinas, E.(1969), Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority(A. Lingis, Trans.). Duquesne University Press. (Original work published 1961). Google Scholar ›
66
Lewis, P. V.(1985), Defining “business ethics”: Like nailing jello to a wall. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(5), pp.377-383. Google Scholar ›
67
Lonsway, K. A., Cortina, L. M., and Magley, V. J.(2008), Sexual harassment mythology: Definition, conceptualization, and measurement. Sex Roles, 58(9), pp.599-615. Google Scholar ›
68
MacKinnon, C. A.(1979), Sexual harassment of working women: A case of sex discrimination. Yale University Press. Google Scholar ›
69
Marcus-Newhall, A., Pedersen, W. C., Carlson, M., and Miller, N.(2000), Displaced aggression is alive and well: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), pp.670-689. Google Scholar ›
70
Marsal, A., and Perkowski, P.(2025), A task-based approach to generative AI: Evidence from a field experiment in central banking. SSRN working paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=5228176. Google Scholar ›
71
Mawritz, M. B., Mayer, D. M., Hoobler, J. M., Wayne, S. J., and Marinova, S. V.(2012), A trickle-down model of abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 65(2), pp.325-357. Google Scholar ›
72
Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., and Salvador, R. B.(2009), How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), pp.1-13. Google Scholar ›
73
McClain, C., Kennedy, B., Gottfried, J., Anderson, M., and Pasquini, G.(2025, April 3), How the U.S. public and AI experts view artificial intelligence. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2025/04/03/how-the-us-public-and-ai-experts-view-artificial-intelligence/. Google Scholar ›
74
Milak, E.(2025, September 9), Actually, AI is a “word calculator” - but not in the sense you might think. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/actually-ai-is-a-word-calculator-but-not-in-the-sense-you-might-think. Google Scholar ›
75
Mintzberg, H.(1971), Managerial work: Analysis from observation. Management Science, 18(2), pp.B97-B110. Google Scholar ›
76
Monsell, S.(2003), Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), pp.134-140. Google Scholar ›
77
Möhlmann, M., Zalmanson, L., Henfridsson, O., and Gregory, R. W.(2021), Algorithmic management of work on online labor platforms: When matching meets control. MIS quarterly, 45(4), pp.1999-2022. Google Scholar ›
78
Mullen, E., and Nadler, J.(2008), Moral spillovers: The effect of moral violations on deviant behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), pp.1239-1245. Google Scholar ›
79
Mussgnug, A. M.(2024), Technology as uncharted territory: Contextual integrity and the notion of AI as new ethical ground. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05130. Google Scholar ›
80
Nass, C., and Moon, Y.(2000), Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), pp.81-103. Google Scholar ›
81
Newman, D. T., Fast, N. J., and Harmon, D. J.(2020), When eliminating bias isn’t fair: Algorithmic reductionism and procedural justice in human resource decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 160, pp.149-167. Google Scholar ›
82
Nielsen, M. B., and Einarsen, S.(2012), Outcomes of exposure to workplace bullying: A meta-analytic review. Work and Stress, 26(4), pp.309-332. Google Scholar ›
83
Noh, H.-H., Rim, H. B., and Lee, B.-K.(2025), Exploring user attitudes and trust toward ChatGPT as a social actor: A UTAUT-based analysis. SAGE Open, 15(2), pp.1-16. Google Scholar ›
84
Nussbaum, M. C.(1995), Objectification. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24(4), pp.249-291. Google Scholar ›
85
Page, T. E., Pina, A., and Giner-Sorolla, R. (2016), “It was only harmless banter!” The development and preliminary validation of the moral disengagement in sexual harassment scale. Aggressive Behavior, 42(3), pp.254-273. Google Scholar ›
86
Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., and Conboy, K. (2025), Responsible artificial intelligence governance: A review and research framework. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 34(2), 101885. Google Scholar ›
87
Park, N., Jang, K., Cho, S., and Choi, J.(2021), Use of offensive language in human-artificial intelligence chatbot interaction: The effects of ethical ideology, social competence, and perceived humanlikeness. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106795. Google Scholar ›
88
Patterson, O.(1982), Slavery and social death. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar ›
89
Priesemuth, M., Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., and Folger, R.(2014), Abusive supervision climate: A multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), pp.1513-1534. Google Scholar ›
90
Qi, T., Liu, H., and Huang, Z.(2025), An assistant or a friend? The role of parasocial relationship in human-computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 167, 108625. Google Scholar ›
91
Raisch, S., and Krakowski, S.(2021), Artificial intelligence and management: The automation-augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), pp.192-210. Google Scholar ›
92
Reeves, B., and Nass, C.(1996), The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar ›
93
Retkowsky, J., Hafermalz, E., and Huysman, M. (2024), Managing a ChatGPT-empowered workforce: Understanding its affordances and side effects. Business Horizons, 67(5), pp.511-523. Google Scholar ›
94
Robb, M. B., and Mann, S.(2025), Talk, trust, and trade-offs: How and why teens use AI companions. Common Sense Media. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/talk-trust-and-trade-offs-how-and-why-teens-use-ai-companions. Google Scholar ›
95
Rozuel, C.(2011), The moral threat of compartmentalization: Self, roles and responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), pp.685 -697. Google Scholar ›
96
Scanlon, T. M.(2000), What we owe to each other. Belknap Press. Google Scholar ›
97
Schein, E. H.(2010), Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar ›
98
Schindeler, E., and Reynald, D. M.(2017), What is the evidence? Preventing psychological violence in the workplace. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 36, pp.25-33. Google Scholar ›
99
Schultz, M. D., Clegg, M., Hofstetter, R., and Seele, P.(2025), Algorithms and dehumanization: A definition and avoidance model. AI and SOCIETY, 40(4), pp.2191-2211. Google Scholar ›
100
Schweitzer, S., and De Cremer, D.(2023), Algorithmic management and the objectification of workers. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2023, No. 1, p. 16169). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. Google Scholar ›
101
Schwitzgebel, E., and Garza, M.(2015), A defense of the rights of artificial intelligences. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 39(1), pp.98-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/misp.12032. Google Scholar ›
102
Searle, J. R.(1980), Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), pp.417 -424. Google Scholar ›
103
Shu, L. L., Gino, F., and Bazerman, M. H. (2011), Dishonest deed, clear conscience: When cheating leads to moral disengagement and motivated forgetting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), pp.330-349. Google Scholar ›
104
Simon, H. A.(1955), A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), pp.99-118. Google Scholar ›
105
Spector, P. E., and Fox, S.(2005), The stressor-emotion model of counterproductive work behavior. In S. Fox and P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets, pp.151 -174. American Psychological Association. Google Scholar ›
106
Staub, E.(1989), The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar ›
107
Strawson, P. F.(1962), Freedom and resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy, 48, pp.1-25. Google Scholar ›
108
Tenbrunsel, A. E., and Messick, D. M.(2004), Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17(2), pp.223-236. Google Scholar ›
109
Tepper, B. J.(2007), Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), pp. 261-289. Google Scholar ›
110
Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., and Hartman, L. P. (2003), A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), pp.5-37. Google Scholar ›
111
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., and Reynolds, S. J.(2006), Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), pp.951-990. Google Scholar ›
112
Turing, A. M.(1950), Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), pp.433-460. Google Scholar ›
113
Van de Ven, A. H., and Johnson, P. E.(2006), Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), pp.802-821. Google Scholar ›
114
Victor, B., and Cullen, J. B.(1988), The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), pp.101-125. Google Scholar ›
115
Vygotsky, L. S.(1978), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar ›
116
Wang, W., Hackett, R. D., Archer, N., Xu, Z., and Yuan, Y.(2025), Will AI-enabled conversational agents acting as digital employees enhance employee job identity? Information and Management, 62, 104099. Google Scholar ›
117
Warren, R., and Tweedale, G.(2002), Business ethics and business history: Neglected dimensions in management education. British Journal of Management, 13(3), pp.209-219. Google Scholar ›
118
Welsh, D. T., Ordóñez, L. D., Snyder, D. G., and Christian, M. S.(2015), The slippery slope: How small ethical transgressions pave the way for larger future transgressions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), pp.114-127. Google Scholar ›
119
Willness, C. R., Steel, P., and Lee, K.(2007), A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Personnel Psychology, 60(1), pp.127-162. Google Scholar ›
120
Wilhelm, L. T., Ding, X., Knutsen, K. M., Carik, B., and Rho, E. H.(2025), How managers perceive AI-assisted conversational training for workplace communication. Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI ’25). ACM. Google Scholar ›
121
Wu, S., Liu, Y., Ruan, M., Chen, S., and Xie, X. Y.(2025), Human-generative AI collaboration enhances task performance but undermines human’s intrinsic motivation. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 15105. Google Scholar ›
122
Yan, C., Chen, Q., Zhou, X., Dai, X., and Yang, Z.(2024), When the Automated fire Backfires: The Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer’s Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company: C Yan et al. Journal of Business Ethics, 190(4), pp.841-859. Google Scholar ›
123
Zao-Sanders, M.(2025, April 9), How people are really using gen AI in 2025. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2025/04/how-people-are-really-using-gen-ai-in-2025. Google Scholar ›

AI는 관리자 윤리를 어떻게 재구성하는가?