쓰기 평가 협의 과정에 나타난 쓰기 평가자의 인식 연구

서수현

광주교육대학교

Korea Business Review Vol. , No. 44, pp. 335-367 (2012)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2012..44.335

PDF 파일이 없습니다.

REFERENCES (43)

[1]
[1] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영민/논술 평가자의 주관적 경험 분석/우리어문연구/2009/(33)/493~523/우리어문학회/ Google Scholar ›
[2]
[2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영민/국어교사의 설명문 평가에 대한 모평균 추정과 평가 예시문 선정/우리어문연구/2010/(36)/293~326/우리어문학회/ Google Scholar ›
[3]
[3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영민/중학생 논설문 평가의 모평균 추정과 평가 예시문 선정/국어교육/2010/(131)/437~461/한국어교육학회/ Google Scholar ›
[4]
[4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영민/Rasch 모형을 활용한 국어교사의 쓰기 평가 특성 분석－중학생 설명문 쓰기 평가를 중심으로－/국어교육학연구/2010/(37)/367~391/국어교육학회/ Google Scholar ›
[5]
[5] [단행본] 프로그램 평가론/배호순/원미사/1994/~/// Google Scholar ›
[6]
[6] [학위논문] 서수현/요인 분석을 통한 쓰기 평가의 준거 설정에 대한 연구/박사/고려대학교 대학원//2008 Google Scholar ›
[7]
[7] [학술지(정기간행물)] 서수현/쓰기 과제 구성 요소의 설정에 대한 연구/국어교육학연구/2008/(33)/449~472/국어교육학회/ Google Scholar ›
[8]
[8] [학술지(정기간행물)] 서수현/쓰기 수업 경험과 학생 필자의 정체성 구성/한국초등국어교육/2010/(44)/141~172/한국초등국어교육학회/ Google Scholar ›
[9]
[9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 정혜승/문식성(literacy) 교육의 쟁점 탐구/교육과정평가연구/2008/11(1)/161~185/한국교육과정평가원/ Google Scholar ›
[10]
[10] [학술지(정기간행물)] 정희모/글쓰기 평가에서 객관-주관주의 대립과 그 함의/우리어문연구/2010/(37)/217~249/우리어문학회/ Google Scholar ›
[11]
[11] [학술지(정기간행물)] 조성만/교과별 좋은 글의 기준 차이에 대한 분석 - 국어․사회․과학 교과를 중심으로/새국어교육/2010/(86)/353~378/한국국어교육학회/ Google Scholar ›
[12]
[12] [학술지(정기간행물)] 조재윤/일반화가능도 이론을 이용한 쓰기 평가의 오차원 분석 및 신뢰도 추정 연구/국어교육/2009/(128)/325~358/한국어교육학회/ Google Scholar ›
[13]
[13] [학술지(정기간행물)] 최숙기/논설문 평가에 나타난 국어교사의 평가 특성 및 편향 분석/교육과정평가연구/2011/14(1)/201~228/한국교육과정평가원/ Google Scholar ›
[14]
[14] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bardine, B. A./Beyond the Red Pen：Clarifying Our Role in the Response Process/English Journal/2000/90(1)/94~101// Google Scholar ›
[15]
[15] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bavelas, J. B./Truths, lies, and equivocation：The effects of conflicting on discourse/Journal of Language and Social Psychology/1990/9/135~161// Google Scholar ›
[16]
[16] [단행본] What we really value：Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing/Broad, R./Utha State University Press/2003/~/// Google Scholar ›
[17]
[17] [학술지(정기간행물)] Curran, J. P./Recalibration of raters to criterion：A methodological note for social skills research/Behavioral Assessment/1980/2/261~268// Google Scholar ›
[18]
[18] [단행본] Measuring Growth in English/Diederich, P. B./National Council of Teachers of English/1974/~/// Google Scholar ›
[19]
[19] [학술지(정기간행물)] Engelhard, G. J./Examining rater errors in the assessment of written composition with a many-faceted Rasch model/Journal of Educational Measurement/1994/31(2)/93~112// Google Scholar ›
[20]
[20] [단행본] Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement：Issues in constructed response, performance testing, and portfolio assessment/Gitomer, D./Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/1993/241~293/// Google Scholar ›
[21]
[21] [단행본] Assessment and evaluation of literacy learning, In Authentic reading assessment：Practices and possibilities/Hancock, J./International Reading Association/1994/46~62/// Google Scholar ›
[22]
[22] [단행본] The influence of holistic scoring procedures on reading and rating student essays. Validating holistic scoring for writing assessment：Theoretical and Empirical Foundations/Huot, B. A./Hampton Press, Inc/1993/~/// Google Scholar ›
[23]
[23] [학술지(정기간행물)] Ivanič, R./Discourses of writing and learning to write/Language and Education/2004/18/220~245// Google Scholar ›
[24]
[24] [단행본] Comparison and analysis of rater responses to the anchor paper in the writing prompt variation study, In Properties of writing task：A study of alternative procedures for holistic writing assessment/Keech, C. L./University of California, Graduate School of Education, Bay Area Writing Project/1982/260~315/// Google Scholar ›
[25]
[25] [학술지(정기간행물)] McKinney, M./Narrating and Performing Identity：Literacy Specialists' Writing Identities/Journal of Literacy Research/2009/41(1)/104~149// Google Scholar ›
[26]
[26] [단행본] Language Testing/McNamara, T./Oxford University Press/2000/~/// Google Scholar ›
[27]
[27] [단행본] Systematic observation, In Encyclopedia of educational research/Medley, D. M./Macmillan/1982/1841~1851/// Google Scholar ›
[28]
[28] [단행본] Validity, In Educational measurement/Messick, S./Collier Macmillan/1989/13~103/// Google Scholar ›
[29]
[29] [학술지(정기간행물)] Mislevy, R. J./Validity as design/Educational Researcher/2007/36/463~469// Google Scholar ›
[30]
[30] [학술지(정기간행물)] Moss, P. A./Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement：Implications for performance assessment/Review of Educational Research/1992/62(3)/229~258// Google Scholar ›
[31]
[31] [학술지(정기간행물)] Moss, P. A./Can there be validity without reliability?/Educational Researcher/1994/23(2)/5~12// Google Scholar ›
[32]
[32] [학술지(정기간행물)] Moss, P. A./Reconstructing validity. Educational Researcher/Educational Researcher/2007/36/470~476// Google Scholar ›
[33]
[33] [단행본] Construct and Consequence：Validity in Writing Assessment, In Handbook of Research of writing：History, Society, School, Individual, Text/Murphy, S/IEA/2008/~/// Google Scholar ›
[34]
[34] [단행본] A study of the construction of the meaning of a writing prompt by its authors, the student writers, and the raters, In Properties of writing task：A study of alternative procedures for holistic writing assessment/Murphy, S./University of California, Graduate School of Education, Bay Area Writing Project/1982/386~468/// Google Scholar ›
[35]
[35] [단행본] A model of background influences on holistic raters, In Validating holistic scoring for writing assessment：Theoretical and empirical foundations/Pula, J. J./Hampton Press, Inc/1993/237~265/// Google Scholar ›
[36]
[36] [단행본] Designing writing tasks for the assessment of writing/Ruth, L./Ablex Publishing Corporation/1988/~/// Google Scholar ›
[37]
[37] [학술지(정기간행물)] Straub, R./The Concept of Control in Teacher Response：Defining the Varieties of "Directive" and "Facilitative" Commentary/College Composition and Communication/1996/47(2)/223~251// Google Scholar ›
[38]
[38] [단행본] Literacy and social change：The significance of social context in the development of literacy programmes, In The future of literacy in a changing world/Street, B. V/Hampton Press, Inc/1999/55~72/// Google Scholar ›
[39]
[39] [학술지(정기간행물)] Sweedler-Brown, C. O./The influences of training and experience on holistic essay evaluation/English Journal/1985/74(5)/49~55// Google Scholar ›
[40]
[40] [학술대회논문] Underwood, J. S./Effective Feedback：Guidelines for Improving Performance/ICLS'08 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences Volume 2/2008//~/ Google Scholar ›
[41]
[41] [학술지(정기간행물)] Weigle, S. C./Investigating rater/prompt interactions in writing assessment：Quantitative and qualitative approaches/Assessing Writing/1999/6(2)/145~178// Google Scholar ›
[42]
[42] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wohlwend, K. E./Dilemmas and Discourses of Learning to Write：Assessment as a Contested Site/Language Arts/2009/86(5)/341~351// Google Scholar ›
[43]
[43] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wolfe, E. W./Uncovering rater's cognitive processing and focus using think-aloud protocols/Journal of Writing Assessment/2005/2(1)/37~56// Google Scholar ›

Publication History

발행일 2012-01-01

Metrics

인용수 24