Media, language and culture are ecology and environment for Korean language arts education. Media, language and culture are operated interactively. Media, language and culture are structured in a way that they are continuous and multi-layered. Therefore, we are experiencing media, language and culture with complexity. We need to research multi-layered phenomena of this ‘media, language and culture’ thus apply them for content of Korean language arts education. For this reason, Korean language arts education has reached a phase for curriculum innovation. Contents of Korean language arts education has relied on logocentrism too much so far, and as the result, students have been alienated from ‘communication skill’ and ‘language ability’, so academic contents such as linguistic and literary theory have enjoyed its exclusive position. Therefore, it was impossible to be accustomed to new ecological environment for Korean language arts education (Culture, Media and Technologies) and its curriculum was not flexible for evolutions. Currently, state of media education in Korean language arts education is as following: First, contents of media education for Korean language arts has its mainstream in terms of functional usage aspects. Second, practicing discussion for education site of media language has not been easily met the discussion of media education research theory. Third, Korean language arts education is reluctant to introduce media phenomena into curriculum contents. Korean language arts education can be evolved by adopting media phenomena in terms of future-centric aspect. First, in future society, intermediated ‘experiences (knowledge)’ led by media will increase. By focusing on the problems in intermediated ‘experiences (knowledge)’, critical literacy regarding media needs to be more focused. Second, Korean language arts education needs to be converted from learning language itself to comprehensive and multi-layered communication skill. Third, contents and demand for media education is more required to play a role for complementary goods rather than alternatives for conventional Korean language arts education. Fourth, it is expected that additional value which can’t be expected now can be produced by preferring and fusing media education within Korean language arts education. This additional value makes korean language arts education more affluent. Furthermore, its value will reach a phase of creating general principles for education from Korean language arts education.