텍스트 위계화를 위한 텍스트 질적 평가 방안 연구 －2007 개정 국어 교과서를 중심으로－

최숙기

한국교육과정평가원

Korea Business Review Vol. , No. 43, pp. 487-522 (2012)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2012..43.487

PDF 파일이 없습니다.

REFERENCES (37)

[1]
[1] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김대희/독서 수준과 텍스트 수준의 위계화 방안에 대한 비판적 고찰/국어교육학연구/2011/(41)/147~168/국어교육학회/ Google Scholar ›
[2]
[2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 서혁/읽기(독서) 교육 체계화를 위한 텍스트 복잡도(Text Complexity) 상세화 연구 (1) －텍스트 복잡도 연구의 비판적 고찰을 중심으로-/국어교육학연구/2011/(42)/433~460/국어교육학회/ Google Scholar ›
[3]
[3] [학술대회논문] 서혁/중등 국어과 교과서 텍스트의 수준과 적합성 검토/한국독서학회 가을학술대회 발표자료집/2011//92~107/ Google Scholar ›
[4]
[4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 윤영선/발달단계에 따른 읽기지도모형 개발과 모형의 타당성 연구/교육평가연구/2001/14(1)/199~222// Google Scholar ›
[5]
[5] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이성영/초등 교과서의 이독성 비교 연구 －국어, 사회, 과학 교과서를 중심으로－/국어교육학연구/2011/(41)/169~193/국어교육학회/ Google Scholar ›
[6]
[6] [학술지(정기간행물)] 조병영/국어과 교육과정의 내용 조직과 진술에 관한 연구-미국, 영국, 일본의 자국어 교육과정 검토를 중심으로-/국어교육/2002/109(109)/6~194/한국어교육학회/ Google Scholar ›
[7]
[7] [학술지(정기간행물)] 조석주/Readability 공식의 개관/영어영문학/1983/29(2)/499~514// Google Scholar ›
[8]
[8] [학위논문] 曺奭柱/英語 Readability 의 測定分析 - 고등학교 영어교과서 를 중심 으로 -/박사/전북대학교//1985 Google Scholar ›
[9]
[9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 조일영/한국어 교육에서 텍스트 자료 수준 평가방안에 관한 연구：양적, 질적 이독성 공식 개발을 중심으로/한국어문교육/2006/15/5~72// Google Scholar ›
[10]
[10] [학술지(정기간행물)] 차배근/국문 독이성 측정 방법 개발을 위한 서설적 소고/서울대 신문연구소 학보/1988/25/113~132// Google Scholar ›
[11]
[11] [학술지(정기간행물)] 정혜승/글 난도(difficulty) 평가를 위한 질적 방법 연구/국어교육/2010/131(131)/523~549/한국어교육학회/ Google Scholar ›
[12]
[12] [학위논문] 최숙기/중학생의 읽기 능력 발달 양상에 관한 연구/박사/한국교원대학교 대학원//2010 Google Scholar ›
[13]
[13] [학술지(정기간행물)] 최숙기/공통핵심교육과정(CCSS)의 읽기 텍스트 위계화 방안에 관한 연구/교육과정평가연구/2011/14(2)/1~29/한국교육과정평가원/ Google Scholar ›
[14]
[14] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bailin, A./The linguistic assumptions underlying readability formulae：A critique/Language and Communication/2001/21(3)/285~301// Google Scholar ›
[15]
[15] [학술지(정기간행물)] Brown, R./How shall a thing be called?/Psychological Review/1958/65(1)/14~21// Google Scholar ›
[16]
[16] [단행본] An Analysis of Textbooks in Relation to Declining SAT Scores/Chall, J./Educational Testing Service/1977/~/// Google Scholar ›
[17]
[17] [단행본] Stages of Reading Development(Second Edition)/Chall, J./Harcourt Brace College Publishers/1996/~/// Google Scholar ›
[18]
[18] [단행본] Readability Revisited：The New Dale-Chall Readability Formula/Chall, J./Brookline Books/1995/~/// Google Scholar ›
[19]
[19] [단행본] Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects/Common Core State Standards Initiative/CCSSO & National Governors Association/2010/~/// Google Scholar ›
[20]
[20] [학술지(정기간행물)] Cunningham, J. W./Investigating the instructional supportiveness of leveled texts/Reading Research Quarterly/2005/40(4)/410~449// Google Scholar ›
[21]
[21] [학술지(정기간행물)] Cohen, J. H./The effects of content are material on cloze test performance/Journal of Reading/1975/19(3)/247~250// Google Scholar ›
[22]
[22] [인터넷자원] Coh-Metrix (Version 2.0) (Software). Memphis, TN：University of Memphis, Institute for Intelligent Systems/http://cohmetrix.memphis.edu/cohmetrixpr/index.html//// Google Scholar ›
[23]
[23] [학술지(정기간행물)] Dale, E./Formula for predicting readability/Educational Research Bulletin/1948/27/37~53// Google Scholar ›
[24]
[24] [학술지(정기간행물)] Das, S./Readability modelling and comparison of one and two parametric fit：A case study in Bangla/Journal of Quantitative Linguistics/2006/13/17~34// Google Scholar ›
[25]
[25] [학술지(정기간행물)] Davison, A./On the failure of readability formulas to define readable texts：A case study from adaptations/Reading Research Quarterly/1982/17/187~209// Google Scholar ›
[26]
[26] [학술지(정기간행물)] Flesch, R./Measuring the level of abstraction/Journal of Applied Psychology/1950/34/384~390// Google Scholar ›
[27]
[27] [학술지(정기간행물)] Fry, E./A readability formula that saves time/Journal of Reading/1968/11(7)/265~71// Google Scholar ›
[28]
[28] [학술지(정기간행물)] Fry, E./Fry's readability graph：Clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17/Journal of Reading/1977/21/242~252// Google Scholar ›
[29]
[29] [단행본] Qualitative Assessment of Text Difficulty/Chall, Jeanne S/BROOKLINE BOOKS/1996/~/// Google Scholar ›
[30]
[30] [단행본] Matching reading materials to readers：The role of readability estimates in conjunction with other information about comprehensibility. In Reading, thinking, and concept development/Klare, G. R./College Entrance Examination Board/1985/~/// Google Scholar ›
[31]
[31] [단행본] A multidimensional framework to evaluate reading assessment tools, In Reading comprehension strategies：Theories, interventions, and technologies/Magliano, J. P./Erlbaum/2007/107~136/// Google Scholar ›
[32]
[32] [보고서] Coh-Metrix：Automated cohesion and coherence scores to predict readability and facilitate comprehension/McNamara, D. S./University of Memphis./2002/~/ Google Scholar ›
[33]
[33] [학술대회논문] McNamara, D. S./Coh-Metrix：Capturing linguistic features of cohesion/Discourse Processes/2010/47/292~330/ Google Scholar ›
[34]
[34] [학술대회논문] Miltsakaki, E./Read-X：Automatic evaluation of reading difficulty of web text/Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007/2007//7280~7286/ Google Scholar ›
[35]
[35] [학술지(정기간행물)] Schriver, K. A./Readability formulas in the new millennium：What’s the use?/ACM Journal of Computer Documentation/2000/24(3)/138~140// Google Scholar ›
[36]
[36] [학술지(정기간행물)] Spache, G. D./A new readability formula for primary-grade reading materials/Elementary School Journal/1953/53/410~413// Google Scholar ›
[37]
[37] [단행본] Text Complexity, the Text Complexity Continuum, and Developing Expertise in Reading/Stenner, A J/MetaMetrics//~/// Google Scholar ›

Publication History

발행일 2012-01-01

Metrics

인용수 36