Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

편집인: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © 한국경영학회 발행주기: 연4회 (02월 28일, 05월 31일, 08월 31일, 11월 30일)
Cover
최신호 60권 5호 2025

논문 정보

ChatGPT 활용 패턴과 논증적 글쓰기 발달 양상

곽수범

연세대학교

Korea Business Review 60권 5호 223-254 (2025)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2025.60.5.223

초록

본 연구는 한 학기 내 진행한 신입생 대학생 글쓰기 수업 중 논증적 글쓰기 과정에서 ChatGPT를 어떻게 활용했는지 탐구하였다. 연구 참여자 124명의 학생은 툴민 기반 논증 모형을 학습한 후 논증적 글쓰기를 하였다. 쓰기 과정에서의 ChatGPT 사용은 6개 척도(표면적 수정, 내용 강화, 조직/통일성, 메타인지 활용, 과의존도, 학생 주도성 조절)로 측정하였다. 분석적 평가 결과 점수는 전반적으로 소폭 향상되었으며, 특히 근거 제시와 반론 부분에서 점수 상승이 나타났다. 이 연구는 논증적 글쓰기 결과물의 질적 향상에 있어 생성형 AI의 피상적인 사용은 유의미한 결과로 이어지지 않는다는 사실을 재확인하였다.

키워드

Artificial intelligenceChatGPTargumentative writingwriting instructionmixed-methods research

참고문헌

  1. [1] [학술지(정기간행물)] Aull L. L./From cow paths to conversation: Rethinking the argumentative essay/Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture/2020/20(1)/21~34//
  2. [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bašić, Ž./ChatGPT-3.5 as writing assistance in students’ essays/Humanities and Social Sciences Communications/2023/10(1)/1~5//
  3. [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bedington A/Writing with generative AI and human-machine teaming: Insights and recommendations from faculty and students/Computers and Composition/2024/71/102833~//
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] Deep P. D./The role of AI in academic writing: Impacts on writing skills, critical thinking, and integrity in higher education/Societies/2025/15(9)/247~//10.3390/soc15090247
  5. [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] Ding L./Rise of generative artificial intelligence in science/Scientometrics/2025/130(9)/5093~5114//
  6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] Duschl, R. A./Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education/Studies in Science Education/2002/38(1)/39~72//
  7. [7] [학술지(정기간행물)] Elycheikh A./Critical Integration of Generative AI in Higher Education: Cognitive, Pedagogical and Ethical Perspectives/London Journal of Research in Humanities & Social Science/2025/25(13)/1~12//
  8. [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] Fontenelle-Tereshchuk, D./Academic writing and ChatGPT: Students transitioning into college in the shadow of the COVID-19 pandemic/Discover Education/2024/3(1)/6~//10.1007/s44217-023-00076-5
  9. [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] Fryer L. K./Chatbot learning partners: Connecting learning experiences, interest and competence/Computers in Human Behavior/2019/93/279~289//
  10. [10] [학술지(정기간행물)] Fuchs K./Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: Is Chat GPT a blessing or a curse?/Frontiers in Education/2023/8/1166682~//
  11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] Godwin-Jones, R./Big data and language learning: Opportunities and challenges/Language Learning & Technology/2021/25(1)/4~19//
  12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] Graham S/A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades/Journal of Educational Psychology/2012/104(4)/879~896//
  13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hutson J./Embracing AI in English composition: Insights and innovations in hybrid pedagogical practices/International Journal of Changes in Education/2024/1(1)/19~31//
  14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] Jin H/Collaboration with ChatGPT: preservice elementary teachers analyzing and interpreting student responses/Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research/2025/7(1)/27~//
  15. [15] [단행본] Best Practices in Writing Instruction/Karchmer R/Guilford/2007/222~241///Best practices in using the Internet to support writing
  16. [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kasneci, E./ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education/Learning and Individual Differences/2023/103/102274~//
  17. [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kim J./Students-Generative AI interaction patterns and its impact on academic writing/Journal of Computing in Higher Education/2025//~//10.1007/s12528-025-09444-6
  18. [18] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kwak, S./Generative AI: A Writing Companion or a Hindrance?/Journal of Reading Research/2024/73/45~80//
  19. [19] [학술지(정기간행물)] Levine, S./How do students use ChatGPT as a writing support?/Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy/2024/68(5)/445~457//10.1002/jaal.1373
  20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] McNeil K. L./Synergy between teacher practices and curricular scaffolds to support students in using domain-specific and domain-general knowledge in writing arguments to explain phenomena/Journal of the Learning Sciences/2009/18(3)/416~460//
  21. [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] Nasr N./Exploring the Impact of Generative AI ChatGPT on Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Passive AI-Directed Use or Human–AI Supported Collaboration?/Education Sciences/2025/15(9)/1198~//10.3390/educsci15091198
  22. [22] [단행본] Teaching and learning argumentative writing in high school English language arts classrooms/Newell G. E./Routledge/2015/~///
  23. [23] [학술지(정기간행물)] Ranalli, J./Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it/Computer Assisted Language Learning/2018/31(7)/653~674//
  24. [24] [단행본] Teaching writing with a word processor, grades 7Y13/Rodriguez, D./ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills and National Council of Teachers of English/1986/~///
  25. [25] [학술지(정기간행물)] Rudolph, J./ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?/Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching/2023/6(1)/342~363//
  26. [26] [학술지(정기간행물)] Steiss J./Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback on students’ writing/Learning and Instruction/2024//~//10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894
  27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] Su Y/Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms/Assessing Writing/2023/57/100752~//
  28. [28] [학술지(정기간행물)] Tate, T./Incorporating generative AI into a writing-intensive undergraduate course without off-loading learning/Discover Computing/2025/28(1)/72~//10.1007/s10791-025-09563-9
  29. [29] [학술지(정기간행물)] Thorp, H. H./ChatGPT is fun, but not an author/Science/2023/379(6630)/313~313//
  30. [30] [단행본] The Uses of Argument/Toulmin, S. E./Cambridge University Press/2003/~///
  31. [31] [학술지(정기간행물)] Tseng, W./AI-writing tools in education: If you can’t beat them, join them/Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning/2023/3(2)/258~262//
  32. [32] [학술지(정기간행물)] Usher, M./From Prompt to Polished: Exploring Student–Chatbot Interactions for Academic Writing Assistance/Education Sciences/2025/15(3)/329~//10.3390/educsci15030329
  33. [33] [단행본] Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation/Van Eemeren, F. H./Routledge/2002/~///
  34. [34] [학술지(정기간행물)] Vetter M. A./Towards a framework for local interrogation of AI ethics: A case study on text generators, academic integrity, and composing with ChatGPT/Computers and Composition/2024/71/102831~//
  35. [35] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wang, C./Exploring Students’ Generative AI-Assisted Writing Processes: Perceptions and Experiences from Native and Nonnative English Speakers/Technology Knowledge and Learning/2025/30(3)/1825~1846//
  36. [36] [학술지(정기간행물)] Zhang M/A commentary of GPT-3 in MIT Technology Review 2021/Fundamental Research/2021/1(6)/831~833//

Korea Business Review · 한국경영학회

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved