.jpeg)
An Analysis of The Relation Between Instructor Commentary Discourse and Revision
Lee, Jaeki
조선대학교
Korea Business Review 40No. pp.467-502 (2011)
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the relation between instructor commentary discourse and revision. For this, 86 drafts and the finished papers, 841 commentary discourses were analyzed. The analysis of the instructor commentary discourse types by their function and topic categories reveals the frequency of DF(62.19%)> EC(14.41%)>EO(8.68%)>DO(3.33%)>DC․SC(2.97%), The most discourse type was to indicate the errors of the form of the composition and to instruct how to revise them. The analysis of the extent of the reflection to revision of the commentary discourse by their function reveals the frequency of directing(88.33%), suggesting(52.78%), evaluating(50.97%), questioning (33.88%), and emoting(0.00.%), The analysis of the extent of the reflection to revision of the commentary discourses by their topic reveals the frequency of form(68.65%), organization(61.94%) and content (29.20%). Based on the research finding, this study suggests four proposal. They are as follows：1) Commentary discourse should be cooperative and dialogic. 2) Commentary discourse should be made to expose the context of the evaluation and questioning. 3) Directing discourse should posses the characteristic of the persuasion genre. 4) Subsequent dialogic processes such as question-answer, counsel and discussion are needed.
Keywords
교수 첨삭교정대학 작문반응수정 전략작문 평가첨삭 담화초고
References
- [1] [학술지(정기간행물)] 나은미/대학 글쓰기에서의 첨삭 프로그램 현황과 개선 방안/한성어문학/2009/28/187~216/한성어문학회/
- [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영민/작문 교육에서 예상독자의 인식과 처리/청람어문교육/2004/(29)/135~160/청람어문교육학회/
- [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박진숙/첨삭지도라는 공통감각과 대학 글쓰기 교육의 개선방향/반교어문연구/2009/10(26)/103~127/반교어문학회/
- [4] [단행본] 논술교육론/원진숙/박이정/1995/~///
- [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이재기/교수 첨삭 담화의 유형과 양상 분석/한민족어문학(구 영남어문학)/2010/(57)/557~597/한민족어문학회/
- [6] [단행본] 글쓰기 교육의 원리와 방법/이재승/교육과학사/2002/~///
- [7] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이은자/논술 첨삭 피드백의 문제점 - 첨삭의 내용을 중심으로/새국어교육/2008/(80)/361~382/한국국어교육학회/
- [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] 임칠성/통합 논술 첨삭 지도 방법 고찰/새국어교육/2006/(74)/49~74/한국국어교육학회/
- [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 정희모/대학생 글쓰기의 수정 방법에 관한 실험 연구 －자기첨삭, 동료첨삭, 교수첨삭의 효과를 중심으로－/국어교육학연구/2008/(33)/657~685/국어교육학회/
- [10] [단행본] 하버마스의 비판이론과 담론 교실/로버트 영/우리교육/2003/~///
- [11] [단행본] Integrating written, oral, visual, and electronic communication across the curriculum/Costello, R. J./Southern Illinois University/2001/~///
- [12] [단행본] Nonacademic writing：The social perspective/Faigley/Guilford/1985/231~248///
- [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hyland, F/Focusing on form：Student engagement with teacher feedback/System/2003/31/217~230//
- [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] Konold, H. E/Using teacher feedback to enhance student learning/Teaching Exceptional Children/2004/36(6)/64~69//
- [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lee, I/L2 writing teachers’ perspectives practices, and problems regarding error feedback/Assessing Writing/2003/8(3)/216~237//
- [16] [기타자료] Lees, E. O/Evaluating Student Writing/College Composition and Communication/1979/~//
- [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] Peitzman, F/From Theory to Practice：Responding to Student Writing/National Writing Project Newsletter/1985/7/4~9//
- [18] [학술지(정기간행물)] Stern, L/Effective faculty feedback：The road less traveled/Assessing Writing/2006/11/22~41//
- [19] [학술지(정기간행물)] Straub, R/Student’ reactions to teacher comments：An exploratory study/Research in the Teching of English/1997/31/91~119//
- [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] Straub, R. E/Reading and responding to student writing：A heuristic for reflective practice/Composition Studies/2002/30(1)/15~60//
- [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] Zinn, A/Ideas in practice：Assessing writing in the developmental classroom/Journal of Developmental Education/1998/22/28~34//