Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

Theoretical reevaluation of research in the writing processes

Kim, Hyeyoun

서울대학교

Korea Business Review 49Vol. 1No. pp.329-359 (2014)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2014.49.1.329

Abstract

This study aims at expanding the cognitive foundation and examiningtheoretical background to find proper directions of its application. For this reason, theoretical perspectives were divided into three: classicalcognitivism, connectionism, and enactivism. Several representative modelsof cognitivism such as cognitive process model of Flower and Hayes,generally take a position that they can systematize the writing processwith symbolic cognitive phases as a unit. They also construct the processas a whole on the basis of the finite and decisive combination relationamong these phases. This tendency can be related with the point whichsocial cognitivism and postprocess theory have criticized as “the tendencyof recognizing as a universal and fixed form”. However, all of the writingprocess research are not performed from this classical cognitivism perspectives. There exist various viewpoints on the cognitive processes duringwriting. Research from the connectionism perspectives, for example,tend to investigate operation system in terms of networks instead of symbolicand fixed system. But they showed problems such as deficient researchresults which couldn’t make the most of uniqueness of the writingprocess or vague investigation on the characteristics of the network itself. Research from the enactivism perspectives showed possibility of presentingthe new perspectives on the writing process, but they had limits ininvestigating the high dimensional cognitive process. Application of the writing process theories, however, is problematicsince it is restricted to the classical cognitivism. Therefore, we need todeal with the writing processes in a multi-dimensional way and to regardit as an integral phenomena. The question of the educational application lies in how we embrace and utilize these various viewpoints on the cognitive processes.

Keywords

쓰기 과정인지심리학인지주의연결주의작동주의작문 교육과정 중심 작문 교육작문 교육과정

References

  1. [1] [학술지(정기간행물)] 공용현/계산주의, 연결주의, 단순성/철학연구/1994/(34)/151~165/철학연구회/
  2. [2] [기타자료] 교육과학기술부/국어과 교육과정/교육과학기술부 고시 제2011 - 361호 [별책 5]/2011/~//
  3. [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김정자/쓰기 ‘과정’의 초점화를 통한 쓰기 지도 방안/국어교육학연구/2006/(26)/129~159/국어교육학회/
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김혜연/작문교육 연구의 지평: 전형성과 창의성의 문제/작문연구/2013/(18)/63~104/한국작문학회/
  5. [5] [학위논문] 김혜연/쓰기 과정에서 생성하기와 검토하기의 역동적 상호작용/박사/서울대학교 대학원/국어교육과 국어교육전공/2014
  6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영목/작문지도 모형과 전략/국어교육/2007/(124)/181~216/한국어교육학회/
  7. [7] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이재승/과정 중심 글쓰기 교육의 허점과 보완/한국초등국어교육/2007/(33)/143~168/한국초등국어교육학회/
  8. [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이정모/인지심리학과 뇌/과학사상/1999/(29)/64~92/범양사출판부/
  9. [9] [학술대회논문] 이정모/마음의 체화적(embodied) 접근: 심리학 패러다임의 제6의 변혁/한국실험심리학회 제43차 학술대회 논문집/2008//~/한국실험심리학회
  10. [10] [단행본] 인지심리학/이정모/학지사/2009/~///
  11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] 정희모/작문 이론의 구체성과 실천성/한국어문교육/2011/(10)/289~310/한국어문교육학회/
  12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] 정희모/작문 연구의 방향과 전망-대학 작문에서 인지적 연구의 필요성과 방향-/작문연구/2013/(18)/9~33/한국작문학회/
  13. [13] [단행본] Through the models of writing/Alamargot, D./Kluwer Academic Publishers/2001/~///
  14. [14] [단행본] The sage handbook of writing development/Alamargot, D./Sage Publications/2009/23~47///Modelling the development of written composition
  15. [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] Anderson, J. R./ACT : A simple theory of complex cognition/American Psychologist/1996/51(4)/355~365//
  16. [16] [단행본] Cognitive processes in writing/Bereiter, C./Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/1980/73~93///Development in writing
  17. [17] [단행본] The psychology of written composition/Bereiter, C./Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/1987/~///
  18. [18] [학술지(정기간행물)] Berninger, V. W./Early Development of Language by Hand : Composing, Reading, Listening, and Speaking Connections; Three Letter-Writing Modes; and Fast Mapping in Spelling/Developmental Neuropsychology/2006/29(1)/61~92//
  19. [19] [단행본] Children’s writing: Process theory of the development of skilled writing/Berninger, V. W./JAI Press/1994/57~81//2/Modifying hayes and flower model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing
  20. [20] [단행본] Academic discourse and critical consciousness/Bizzell, P./University of Pittsburgh Press/1992/~///
  21. [21] [단행본] Microcognition: Philosophy, cognitive science, and parallel distributed processing/Clark, A./MIT Press/1989/~///
  22. [22] [단행본] Beyond postprocess/Couture, B./Utah State University Press/2011/21~40///Writing and accountability
  23. [23] [단행본] 글쓰기의 문제해결전략/Flower, L./동문선/1993/~///
  24. [24] [학술지(정기간행물)] Flower, L./A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing/College Composition and Communication/1981/32(4)/365~387//
  25. [25] [학술지(정기간행물)] Flower, L./Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision/College Composition and Communication/1986/37(1)/16~55//
  26. [26] [단행본] Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production/Galbraith, D./Amsterdam University Press/1999/139~160///Writing as a knowledge-constituting process
  27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] Galbraith, D./The contribution of different components of working memory to knowledge transformation during writing/L1-Educational Studies in Language & Literature/2005/5(2)/113~145//
  28. [28] [학술지(정기간행물)] Gobet, F./Some shortcomings of long-term working memory/British Journal of Psychology/2000/91(4)/551~570//
  29. [29] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hayes, J. R./Modeling and remodeling writing/Written Communication/2012/29(3)/369~388//
  30. [30] [단행본] The science of writing: Theories, methods, and applications/Hayes, J. R./Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/1996/29~56///On the nature of planning in writing
  31. [31] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hurley, S./The shared circuits model(SCM) : How control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading/Behavioral and Brain Sciences/2008/31(1)/1~50//
  32. [32] [단행본] The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications/Kellogg, R. T./Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/1996/57~72///A model of working memory in writing
  33. [33] [단행본] The cognitive demands of writing/Levy, C. M./Amsterdam University Press/1999/25~41///Testing components of Kellogg’s multicomponent model of working memory in writing: The role of the phonological loop
  34. [34] [단행본] Handbook of research on writing/McCutchen, D./Routledge/2008/451~470///Writing and cognition: Implications of the cognitive architecture for learning to write and writing to learn
  35. [35] [단행본] The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers/Nystrand, M./Emerald Group Publishing Ltd/1986/~///
  36. [36] [학술지(정기간행물)] Nystrand, M./Where Did Composition Studies Come From? An Intellectual History/Written Communication/1993/10(3)/267~333//
  37. [37] [학술지(정기간행물)] Olive, T./Working memory in writing : Empirical evidence from the dual-task technique/European Psychologist/2004/9(1)/32~42//
  38. [38] [학술지(정기간행물)] Olive, T./Verbal, visual, and spatial working memory demands during text composition/Applied Psycholinguistics/2008/29(4)/669~687//
  39. [39] [단행본] Handbook of writing research/Pritchard, R. J./The Guilford Press/2006/275~290///The process approach to writing instruction:Examining its effectiveness
  40. [40] [단행본] Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach/Rogers, T. T./MIT Press/2006/~///
  41. [41] [단행본] Parallel distributed processing:Explorations in the microstructure of cognition/Rumelhart, D. E./MIT Press/1986/~///
  42. [42] [단행본] The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, and Applications/Torrance, M./Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/1996/189~205///Finding something to write about: Strategic and automatic processes in idea generation
  43. [43] [단행본] The embodied mind : Cognitive science and human experience/Varela, F. J./The MIT Press/1991/~///
  44. [44] [학술지(정기간행물)] Waters, G./The relationship between age, processing speed, working memory capacity, and language comprehension/Memory/2005/13(3/4)/403~413//

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved