Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

편집인: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © 한국경영학회 발행주기: 연4회 (02월 28일, 05월 31일, 08월 31일, 11월 30일)
Cover
최신호 60권 5호 2025

논문 정보

디지털 환경에서의 다문서 선택, 사용의 영향 요인 분석 — 어떤 사람이 가짜 뉴스, 거짓 정보에 넘어가는가?

장성민

인하대학교

Korea Business Review 57권 2호 245-294 (2022)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2022.57.2.245

초록

이 연구는 디지털 환경에서의 다문서 선택과 사용에 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석하기 위한 목적으로 수행되었다. 이를 위해 내용 관련성과 출처 신뢰성(저자 전문성)을 개체 내 요인으로 삼아 네 개의 범주에 걸친 총 16개의문서를 디지털 환경에 구현하고, 고등학생 450명을 표집하여 이들이 어떤속성의 문서를 선택하고 사용하는지 반복측정 분산분석을 사용하여 살펴보았다. 또한 ‘문화 다양성’에 대한 화제 친숙도와 인식론적 신념 수준을 개체간 요인으로 삼아 재분석함으로써 개인차 요인에 따라 다문서 선택과 사용이 어떻게 달라지는지 검토하였다. 분석 결과, 참여자들은 전반적으로 저자 전문성보다 내용 관련성에 더주의를 기울이는 것으로 나타났다. 사전지식 수준이 낮은 참여자가 더 많은문서를 선택하되, 문서로부터 정보 단위를 추출하여 자신의 글에 사용할 때에는 사전지식 수준이 높은 참여자가 보다 정교화된 수행을 보이고 있었다. 인식론적 신념 수준에 따라서는 소박한 신념의 참여자가 더 많은 문서를 선택하고 사용하고 있었다.

키워드

다문서 문식성디지털내용 관련성출처 신뢰성저자 전문성화제 친숙도사전지식인식론적 신념

참고문헌

  1. [1] [단행본] 등급별 국어교육용 어휘/김광해/박이정/2003/~///
  2. [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박병기/인식론적 신념의 척도 재타당화 및 영역성 탐색/교육심리연구/2012/26(3)/739~767/한국교육심리학회/
  3. [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 손승혜/트위터는 어떻게 가짜뉴스를 유통시키는가?: <교통법규 개정설>과 <9월 전쟁설>의 트위터 유통 패턴과 유력자, 빈출단어 분석/사이버커뮤니케이션학보/2018/35(4)/203~251/사이버커뮤니케이션학회/10.36494/JCAS.2018.12.35.4.203
  4. [4] [학위논문] 이소라/다중관점 읽기의 발달 양상과 교육 내용 연구-인식론적 신념을 기반으로/박사/이화여자대학교//2017
  5. [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이용준/Post-truth 시대의 가짜 뉴스와 리터러시 교육의 중점/리터러시 연구/2020/11(6)/101~134/한국 리터러시 학회/https://doi.org/10.37736/KJLR.2020.12.11.6.04
  6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장성민/요약형 과제와 논증형 과제의 수행이 텍스트 학습에 미치는 효과/국어교육연구/2016/(38)/143~191/국어교육연구소/10.17313/jkorle.2016..38.143
  7. [7] [학위논문] 장성민/귀추적 관점 기반의 학습 목적 글쓰기 교육 연구-글쓰기 수행 예측모형을 중심으로/박사/서울대학교//2018
  8. [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장성민/상호문화적 감수성 측정 도구 개발 및 타당화/리터러시 연구/2021/12(5)/303~328/한국 리터러시 학회/
  9. [9] [학위논문] 최건아/자료 텍스트에 대한 모둠 토의가 글 내용 생성에 미치는 효과 연구/박사/고려대학교 대학원/국어교육학과 국어교육전공/2013
  10. [10] [단행본] 교육용 텍스트의 이독성 평가 준거개발 연구/최소영/한국교육과정평가원/2021/~///
  11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] Anmarkrud, Ø./Task-oriented reading of multiple documents : Online comprehension processes and offline products/Instructional Science/2013/41(5)/873~894//
  12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] Barzilai, S./The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints/Learning and Instruction/2015/36/86~103//
  13. [13] [단행본] Handbook of learning from multiple representations and perspectives/Barzilai, S./Routledge/2020/~///Beyond trustworthiness: Comprehending multiple source perspectives
  14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bormuth, J. R./Readability : A new approach/Reading Research Quarterly/1966/1(3)/79~132//
  15. [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] Braasch, J. L. G./Promoting secondary school students’ evaluation of source features of multiple documents/Contemporary Educational Psychology/2013/38/180~195//
  16. [16] [단행본] Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences/Braasch, J. L./MIT Press/2014/~///Sensitivity to inaccurate argumentation in health news articles: Potential contributions of readers’topic and epistemic beliefs
  17. [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten, I./Developing and testing a model of direct and indirect relationships between individual differences, processing, and multiple-text comprehension/Learning and Instruction/2014/30/9~24//
  18. [18] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten, I./Task ‐oriented learning with multiple documents : Effects of topic familiarity, author expertise, and content relevance on document selection, processing, and use/Reading Research Quarterly/2018/53(3)/345~365//
  19. [19] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten, I./Epistemological beliefs, interest, and gender as predictors of Internet-based learning activities/Computers in Human Behavior/2006/22(6)/1027~1042//
  20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten, I./Trust matters : Examining the role of source evaluation in students’ construction of meaning within and across multiple texts/Reading Research Quarterly/2009/44(1)/6~28//
  21. [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten, I./Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change/Learning and Instruction/2011/21(2)/180~192//
  22. [22] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten, I./Are sophisticated students always better? The role of topic-specific personal epistemology in the understanding of multiple expository texts/Contemporary Educational Psychology/2008/33(4)/814~840//
  23. [23] [학술지(정기간행물)] Britt, M. A./Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information/Cognition and instruction/2002/20(4)/485~522//
  24. [24] [학술지(정기간행물)] Cerdán, R./The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple documents/Journal of Educational Psychology/2008/100(1)/209~222//
  25. [25] [학술지(정기간행물)] Chen, G. M./The development and validation of the intercultural sensitivity scale/Human Communication/2000/3/1~15//
  26. [26] [단행본] Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects/Common Core State Standards Initiative/NGA center/2010/~///
  27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] Dale, E./A formula for predicting readability : Instructions/Educational Research Bulletin/1948/27/37~54//
  28. [28] [학술지(정기간행물)] De Keersmaecker, J./‘Fake news’: Incorrect, but hard to correct. The role of cognitive ability on the impact of false information on social impressions/Intelligence/2017/65/107~110//
  29. [29] [단행본] Scale development: Theory and applications/DeVellis, R. F./Sage publications/2016/~///
  30. [30] [학술지(정기간행물)] Flesch, R./A new readability yardstick/Journal of Applied Psychology/1948/32(3)/221~233//
  31. [31] [학술지(정기간행물)] Gil, L./Understanding and integrating multiple science texts : Summary tasks are sometimes better than argument tasks/Reading Psychology/2010/31(1)/30~68//
  32. [32] [학술지(정기간행물)] Goldman, S. R./Comprehending and learning from Internet sources : Processing patterns of better and poorer learners/Reading Research Quarterly/2012/47(4)/356~381//
  33. [33] [단행본] Text relevance and learning from text/Graesser, A. C./Information Age/2011/~///Questions drive comprehension of text and multimedia
  34. [34] [학술지(정기간행물)] Grimes, G. A./Older adults’knowledge of internet hazards/Educational Gerontology/2010/36(3)/173~192//
  35. [35] [학술지(정기간행물)] Guess, A./Less than you think : Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook/Science advances/2019/5(1)/~//
  36. [36] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hagen, Å. M. M./Relationships between spontaneous note-taking, self-reported strategies and comprehension when reading multiple texts in different task conditions/Journal of Research in Reading/2014/37(S1)/S141~S157//
  37. [37] [단행본] APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues/Hofer, B. K./American Psychological Association/2012/~///Personal epistemology: Theory, research, and future directions
  38. [38] [학술지(정기간행물)] Jung, E. H./Factors influencing the perceived credibility of diet-nutrition information web sites/Computers in Human Behavior/2016/58/37~47//
  39. [39] [단행본] The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning/Kahneman, D./Cambridge University Press/2005/~///A model of heuristic judgment
  40. [40] [단행본] Handbook of learning from multiple representations and perspectives/Kendeou, P./Routledge/2020/~///The Challenge of Fake News: Intellectual Survival in the Context of Multiple Representations and Perspectives
  41. [41] [단행본] Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences/Kendeou, P./MIT Press/2014/~///The knowledge revision components (KReC)framework: Processes and mechanisms
  42. [42] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kobayashi, K./The influence of topic knowledge, external strategy use, and college experience on students’ comprehension of controversial texts/Learning and Individual Differences/2009/19(1)/130~134//
  43. [43] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lewandowsky, S./Beyond misinformation : Understanding and coping with the"post-truth"era/Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition/2017/6/353~369//
  44. [44] [학술지(정기간행물)] List, A./Investigating the cognitive affective engagement model of learning from multiple texts : A structural equation modeling approach/Reading Research Quarterly/2021/56(4)/781~817//
  45. [45] [학술지(정기간행물)] List, A./Toward an integrated framework of multiple text use/Educational Psychologist/2019/54(1)/20~39//
  46. [46] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lucassen, T./Topic familiarity and information skills in online credibility evaluation/Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology/2013/64(2)/254~264//
  47. [47] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lucassen, T./Factual accuracy and trust in information : The role of expertise/Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology/2011/62(7)/1232~1242//
  48. [48] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lucassen, T./The influence of source cues and topic familiarity on credibility evaluation/Computers in Human Behavior/2013/29(4)/1387~1392//
  49. [49] [학술지(정기간행물)] Mateos, M./Learning paths in synthesis writing : Which learning path contributes most to which learning outcome?/Instructional Science/2020/48(2)/137~157//
  50. [50] [학술지(정기간행물)] McCrudden, M. T./Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing/Educational Psychology Review/2007/19(2)/113~139//
  51. [51] [학술지(정기간행물)] McCrudden, M. T./The effects of topic familiarity, author expertise, and content relevance on Norwegian students’document selection : A mixed methods study/Journal of Educational Psychology/2016/108(2)/147~162//
  52. [52] [학술지(정기간행물)] McNamara, D. S./SERT : Self-explanation reading training/Discourse Processes/2004/38(1)/1~30//
  53. [53] [단행본] Handbook of learning from multiple representations and perspectives/Miele, D. B./Routledge/2020/~///Motivation and the Processing of Multiple Inputs
  54. [54] [학술지(정기간행물)] Nussbaum, E. M./Using argumentation vee diagrams(AVDs)for promoting argument-counterargument integration in reflective writing/Journal of Educational Psychology/2008/100(3)/549~565//
  55. [55] [학술지(정기간행물)] Olejnik, S./Measures of effect size for comparative studies : Applications, interpretations, and limitations/Contemporary Educational Psychology/2000/25/241~286//
  56. [56] [학술지(정기간행물)] Peterson, E. G./Navigating print and digital sources : Students’selection, use, and integration of multiple sources across mediums/Journal of Experimental Education/2020/88(1)/27~46//
  57. [57] [단행본] Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change/Petty, R. E./SpringerVerlag/1986/~///
  58. [58] [단행본] Handbook of learning from multiple representations and perspectives/Rapp, D. N./Routledge/2020/~///Assessing and modifying knowledge: Facts vs. constellations
  59. [59] [학술지(정기간행물)] Rodicio, H. G./Students’ evaluation strategies in a Web research task : Are they sensitive to relevance and reliability?/Journal of Computing in Higher Education/2015/27(2)/134~157//
  60. [60] [단행본] Text relevance and learning from text/Rouet, J. F./Information Age/2011/~///Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension
  61. [61] [학술지(정기간행물)] Rouet, J. F./The influence of surface and deep cues on primary and secondary school students’ assessment of relevance in Web menus/Learning and Instruction/2011/21(2)/205~219//
  62. [62] [학술지(정기간행물)] Royer, J. M./The assessment of levels of domain expertise while reading/Cognition and instruction/1996/14(3)/373~408//
  63. [63] [학술지(정기간행물)] Salmerón, L./Searching the Web for conflicting topics : Page and user factors/Computers in Human Behavior/2013/29(6)/2161~2171//
  64. [64] [단행본] Handbook of learning from multiple representations and perspectives/Sanderson, J. A./Routledge/2020/~///The challenge of misinformation and ways to reduce its impact
  65. [65] [단행본] Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences/Stadtler, M./MIT Press/2014/~///The content - source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information
  66. [66] [학술지(정기간행물)] Strømsø, H. I./Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and multiple‐text comprehension among upper secondary students/Educational Psychology/2009/29(4)/425~445//
  67. [67] [학술지(정기간행물)] Strømsø, H. I./Reading multiple texts about climate change : The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension/Learning and Instruction/2010/20(3)/192~204//
  68. [68] [학술지(정기간행물)] Strømsø, H. I./Spontaneous sourcing among students reading multiple documents/Cognition and Instruction/2013/31/176~203//
  69. [69] [학술지(정기간행물)] Swire, B./The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information/Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, memory, and cognition/2017/43(12)/1948~1961//
  70. [70] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wiley, J./Constructing arguments from multiple sources : Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text/Journal of Educational Psychology/1999/91(2)/301~311//

Korea Business Review · 한국경영학회

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved