초록

키워드

참고문헌

1. [1] [기타자료] 교육부/국어과 교육과정(교육부 고시 제2022-33호)/교육부/2022/~//
2. [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김성엽/다문서 읽기에서 정보 수용과 관점 재구성 양상 연구 : 중학생 독자의 입장을 중심으로/독서연구/2023/68/181~216//
3. [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김혜정/설명적 글 읽기를 위한 독해 전략-수능 국어 시험의 지문 유형을 중심으로/우리말연구/2017/50/141~170//
4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 서혁/읽기(독서)교육 체계화를 위한 텍스트 복잡도(Text Complexity)상세화 연구(1)-텍스트 복잡도 연구의 비판적 고찰을 중심으로-/국어교육학연구/2011/42/433~460//
5. [5] [학위논문] 오성렬/다문서 통합의 양상과 수준 및 영향 요인에 관한 연구 : 고등학교 3학년생의 도해 조직자에 나타난 통합을 중심으로/석사/고려대학교//2023
6. [6] [학위논문] 오은하/다문서 이해 교육 내용 체계화 연구: 탐색, 통합, 비판을 중심으로/박사/이화여자대학교//2020
7. [7] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이삼형/텍스트 난이도에 따른 핵심 어휘와 그 관계망 변화에 대한 연구/우리말글/2018/53/179~221//
8. [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장성민/고등학생의 자료 통합적 글쓰기에서 분량에 따른 능숙한 필자와 미숙한 필자의논증 양상 비교/국어교육학연구/2015/50/193~233//
9. [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장성민/디지털 다문서 환경에서의 읽기·쓰기 : 개인차 요인, 다문서 선택과 사용, 쓰기결과물 사이의 영향 관계/독서연구/2022/65/41~80//
10. [10] [학술지(정기간행물)] Anmarkrud, Ø./Multiple-documents literacy : Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents/Learning and Individual Differences/2014/30/64~76//
11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] Anmarkrud, Ø./Task-oriented reading of multiple documents : online comprehension processes and offline products/Instructional Science/2013/41/873~894//
12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] Barzilai, S./The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints/Learning and Instruction/2015/36/86~103//
13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] Barzilai, S./Learning to integrate divergent information sources : The interplay of epistemic cognition and epistemic metacognition/Metacognition and Learning/2017/12(2)/193~232//
14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] Barzilai, S./Promoting integration of multiple texts : A review of instructional approaches and practices/Educational Psychology Review/2018/30/973~999//
15. [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten, I./Task-oriented learning with multiple documents : Effects of topic familiarity, author expertise, and content relevance on document selection, processing, and use/Reading Research Quarterly/2018/53(3)/345~365//
16. [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten, I./Effects of Task Instruction and Personal Epistemology on the Understanding of Multiple Texts About Climate Change/Discourse Processes/2009/47(1)/1~31//
17. [17] [단행본] Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes/Britt, M. A./Cambridge University Press/2012/~///Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition
18. [18] [단행본] Handbook of multiple source use/Britt, M. A./Routledge/2018/~///Representations and processes in multiple source use
19. [19] [단행본] Handbook of multiple source use/Cho, B. Y./Routledge/2018/~///Strategic processing in accessing, comprehending, and using multiple sources online
20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] Eccles, J. S./In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’achievement task values and expectancy - related beliefs/Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin/1995/21(3)/215~225//
21. [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] Fulmer, S. M./Motivation during an excessively challenging reading task : The buffering role of relative topic interest/The Journal of Experimental Education/2011/79(2)/185~208//
22. [22] [학술지(정기간행물)] Fulmer, S. M./Changes in interest and affect during a difficult reading task : Relationships with perceived difficulty and reading fluency/Learning and Instruction/2013/27/11~20//
23. [23] [학술지(정기간행물)] Gil, L./Summary versus argument tasks when working with multiple documents : Which is better for whom?/Contemporary Educational Psychology/2010/35(3)/157~173//
24. [24] [학술지(정기간행물)] Glaser, B. G./The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis/Social Problems/1965/12(4)/436~445//
25. [25] [학술지(정기간행물)] Grotek, M./The perceived and measured difficulty of texts and tasks in L1 and L2/Reading in a Foreign Language/2024/36(1)/1~20//
26. [26] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hartman, D. K./Eight readers reading : The intertextual links of proficient readers reading multiple passages/Reading Research Quarterly/1995/30(3)/520~561//
27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hidi, S./Interest, reading, and learning : Theoretical and practical considerations/Educational Psychology Review/2001/13/191~209//
28. [28] [단행본] Principles and practice of structural equation modeling/Kline, R. B./Guildford Press/2015/~///
29. [29] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kobayashi, K./Learning from conflicting texts: The role of intertextual conflict in between- text integration/Reading Psychology/2015/36(6)/519~544//
30. [30] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kolb, S. M./Grounded theory and the constant comparative method : Valid research strategies for educators/Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies/2012/3(1)/83~86//
31. [31] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kurby, C. A./The role of top-down and bottom-up processes in between-text integration/Reading Psychology/2005/26(4-5)/335~362//
32. [32] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lee, H. Y./Examining students’ self-efficacy and perceptions of task difficulty in learning from multiple texts/Learning and Individual Differences/2021/90/1~15//
33. [33] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lee, H. Y./The role of relevance determinations in multiple text reading and writing : an investigation of the MD-TRACE/Discourse Processes/2023/60(1)/42~72//
34. [34] [학술지(정기간행물)] List, A./Toward an integrated framework of multiple text use/Educational Psychologist/2019/54(1)/20~39//
35. [35] [학술지(정기간행물)] List, A./Understanding students’ conceptions of task assignments/Contemporary Educational Psychology/2019/59/101801~//
36. [36] [학술지(정기간행물)] McCrudden, M. T./Bridging Inferences and Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts/Discourse Processes/2021/58(5-6)/529~548//
37. [37] [단행본] The construction of mental representations during reading/Perfetti, C. A./Erlbaum Associates/1999/~///Towards a theory of documents representation
38. [38] [학술지(정기간행물)] Primor, L./Measuring multiple text integration : A review/Frontiers in Psychology/2018/9/2294~//
39. [39] [단행본] The skills of document use : From text comprehension to Web-based learning/Rouet, J. -F./Routledge/2006/~///
40. [40] [단행본] Text relevance and learning from text/Rouet, J. -F./IAP/2011/~///Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension
41. [41] [학술지(정기간행물)] Rouet, J. -F./Studying and using multiple documents in history : effects of discipline expertise/Cognition and Instruction/1997/15(1)/85~106//
42. [42] [학술지(정기간행물)] Schoor, C./Readers’ perceived task demands and their relation to multiple document comprehension strategies and outcome/Learning and Individual Differences/2021/88/102018~//
43. [43] [학술지(정기간행물)] Schunk, D. H./Self-efficacy for reading and writing : Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation/Reading & Writing Quarterly/2003/19(2)/159~172//
44. [44] [단행본] Writing and cognition: Research and applications/Segev-Miller, R./Elsevier Science/2007/~///Cognitive processes in discourse synthesis: The case of intertextual processing strategies
45. [45] [학술지(정기간행물)] Spivey, N. N./Readers as writers composing from sources/Reading Research Quarterly/1989/24(1)/7~26//
46. [46] [단행본] Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences/Stadtler, M./The MIT Press/2014/~///The content - source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information
47. [47] [학술지(정기간행물)] Strømsø, H. I./Reading multiple texts about climate change : The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension/Learning and Instruction/2010/20(3)/192~204//
48. [48] [단행본] Handbook of individual differences in reading:Reader, text, and context/Van den Broek, P./Routledge/2016/~///Individual differences in reading comprehension
49. [49] [학술지(정기간행물)] Walraven, A./Information-problem solving : A review of problems students encounter and instructional solutions/Computers in Human Behavior/2008/24(3)/623~648//