Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

Middle School Students' Perceptions of the Difficulty of Multiple - text Integration Tasks — Focusing on the Relations with the Levels of Integration

Oh SeongRyeol Kim SeongYeup

서울과학고등학교 Pennsylvania State Univ.

Korea Business Review 59Vol. 4No. pp.159-202 (2024)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2024.59.4.159

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate how middle school readers assessed the difficulty of multiple-text integration tasks and to determine the re- lationship between their perceptions of the difficulty of these tasks and their level of multiple-text integration. To achieve this, students were presented with a multiple-text integration task, and the reasons for their judgment of the task’s difficulty were categorized using a constant com- parative method. Additionally, levels of multiple-text integration were measured. The relations between the types of task difficulty judgments, perceived difficulty, and actual integration levels were then analyzed. The findings revealed that judgments regarding the difficulty of integration tasks could be categorized into five major types. Furthermore, significant differences in perceived difficulty were found between specific types. However, the correlation between perceived task difficulty and multi- ple-text integration level was not significant, and this tendency was ap- parent among students with lower integration levels.

Keywords

다문서 이해다문서 통합과제 표상중학생 독자MD-TRACE

References

  1. [1] [기타자료] 교육부/국어과 교육과정(교육부 고시 제2022-33호)/교육부/2022/~//
  2. [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김성엽/다문서 읽기에서 정보 수용과 관점 재구성 양상 연구 : 중학생 독자의 입장을 중심으로/독서연구/2023/68/181~216//
  3. [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김혜정/설명적 글 읽기를 위한 독해 전략-수능 국어 시험의 지문 유형을 중심으로/우리말연구/2017/50/141~170//
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 서혁/읽기(독서)교육 체계화를 위한 텍스트 복잡도(Text Complexity)상세화 연구(1)-텍스트 복잡도 연구의 비판적 고찰을 중심으로-/국어교육학연구/2011/42/433~460//
  5. [5] [학위논문] 오성렬/다문서 통합의 양상과 수준 및 영향 요인에 관한 연구 : 고등학교 3학년생의 도해 조직자에 나타난 통합을 중심으로/석사/고려대학교//2023
  6. [6] [학위논문] 오은하/다문서 이해 교육 내용 체계화 연구: 탐색, 통합, 비판을 중심으로/박사/이화여자대학교//2020
  7. [7] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이삼형/텍스트 난이도에 따른 핵심 어휘와 그 관계망 변화에 대한 연구/우리말글/2018/53/179~221//
  8. [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장성민/고등학생의 자료 통합적 글쓰기에서 분량에 따른 능숙한 필자와 미숙한 필자의논증 양상 비교/국어교육학연구/2015/50/193~233//
  9. [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장성민/디지털 다문서 환경에서의 읽기·쓰기 : 개인차 요인, 다문서 선택과 사용, 쓰기결과물 사이의 영향 관계/독서연구/2022/65/41~80//
  10. [10] [학술지(정기간행물)] Anmarkrud, Ø./Multiple-documents literacy : Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents/Learning and Individual Differences/2014/30/64~76//
  11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] Anmarkrud, Ø./Task-oriented reading of multiple documents : online comprehension processes and offline products/Instructional Science/2013/41/873~894//
  12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] Barzilai, S./The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints/Learning and Instruction/2015/36/86~103//
  13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] Barzilai, S./Learning to integrate divergent information sources : The interplay of epistemic cognition and epistemic metacognition/Metacognition and Learning/2017/12(2)/193~232//
  14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] Barzilai, S./Promoting integration of multiple texts : A review of instructional approaches and practices/Educational Psychology Review/2018/30/973~999//
  15. [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten, I./Task-oriented learning with multiple documents : Effects of topic familiarity, author expertise, and content relevance on document selection, processing, and use/Reading Research Quarterly/2018/53(3)/345~365//
  16. [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten, I./Effects of Task Instruction and Personal Epistemology on the Understanding of Multiple Texts About Climate Change/Discourse Processes/2009/47(1)/1~31//
  17. [17] [단행본] Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes/Britt, M. A./Cambridge University Press/2012/~///Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition
  18. [18] [단행본] Handbook of multiple source use/Britt, M. A./Routledge/2018/~///Representations and processes in multiple source use
  19. [19] [단행본] Handbook of multiple source use/Cho, B. Y./Routledge/2018/~///Strategic processing in accessing, comprehending, and using multiple sources online
  20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] Eccles, J. S./In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’achievement task values and expectancy - related beliefs/Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin/1995/21(3)/215~225//
  21. [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] Fulmer, S. M./Motivation during an excessively challenging reading task : The buffering role of relative topic interest/The Journal of Experimental Education/2011/79(2)/185~208//
  22. [22] [학술지(정기간행물)] Fulmer, S. M./Changes in interest and affect during a difficult reading task : Relationships with perceived difficulty and reading fluency/Learning and Instruction/2013/27/11~20//
  23. [23] [학술지(정기간행물)] Gil, L./Summary versus argument tasks when working with multiple documents : Which is better for whom?/Contemporary Educational Psychology/2010/35(3)/157~173//
  24. [24] [학술지(정기간행물)] Glaser, B. G./The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis/Social Problems/1965/12(4)/436~445//
  25. [25] [학술지(정기간행물)] Grotek, M./The perceived and measured difficulty of texts and tasks in L1 and L2/Reading in a Foreign Language/2024/36(1)/1~20//
  26. [26] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hartman, D. K./Eight readers reading : The intertextual links of proficient readers reading multiple passages/Reading Research Quarterly/1995/30(3)/520~561//
  27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hidi, S./Interest, reading, and learning : Theoretical and practical considerations/Educational Psychology Review/2001/13/191~209//
  28. [28] [단행본] Principles and practice of structural equation modeling/Kline, R. B./Guildford Press/2015/~///
  29. [29] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kobayashi, K./Learning from conflicting texts: The role of intertextual conflict in between- text integration/Reading Psychology/2015/36(6)/519~544//
  30. [30] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kolb, S. M./Grounded theory and the constant comparative method : Valid research strategies for educators/Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies/2012/3(1)/83~86//
  31. [31] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kurby, C. A./The role of top-down and bottom-up processes in between-text integration/Reading Psychology/2005/26(4-5)/335~362//
  32. [32] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lee, H. Y./Examining students’ self-efficacy and perceptions of task difficulty in learning from multiple texts/Learning and Individual Differences/2021/90/1~15//
  33. [33] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lee, H. Y./The role of relevance determinations in multiple text reading and writing : an investigation of the MD-TRACE/Discourse Processes/2023/60(1)/42~72//
  34. [34] [학술지(정기간행물)] List, A./Toward an integrated framework of multiple text use/Educational Psychologist/2019/54(1)/20~39//
  35. [35] [학술지(정기간행물)] List, A./Understanding students’ conceptions of task assignments/Contemporary Educational Psychology/2019/59/101801~//
  36. [36] [학술지(정기간행물)] McCrudden, M. T./Bridging Inferences and Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts/Discourse Processes/2021/58(5-6)/529~548//
  37. [37] [단행본] The construction of mental representations during reading/Perfetti, C. A./Erlbaum Associates/1999/~///Towards a theory of documents representation
  38. [38] [학술지(정기간행물)] Primor, L./Measuring multiple text integration : A review/Frontiers in Psychology/2018/9/2294~//
  39. [39] [단행본] The skills of document use : From text comprehension to Web-based learning/Rouet, J. -F./Routledge/2006/~///
  40. [40] [단행본] Text relevance and learning from text/Rouet, J. -F./IAP/2011/~///Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension
  41. [41] [학술지(정기간행물)] Rouet, J. -F./Studying and using multiple documents in history : effects of discipline expertise/Cognition and Instruction/1997/15(1)/85~106//
  42. [42] [학술지(정기간행물)] Schoor, C./Readers’ perceived task demands and their relation to multiple document comprehension strategies and outcome/Learning and Individual Differences/2021/88/102018~//
  43. [43] [학술지(정기간행물)] Schunk, D. H./Self-efficacy for reading and writing : Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation/Reading & Writing Quarterly/2003/19(2)/159~172//
  44. [44] [단행본] Writing and cognition: Research and applications/Segev-Miller, R./Elsevier Science/2007/~///Cognitive processes in discourse synthesis: The case of intertextual processing strategies
  45. [45] [학술지(정기간행물)] Spivey, N. N./Readers as writers composing from sources/Reading Research Quarterly/1989/24(1)/7~26//
  46. [46] [단행본] Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences/Stadtler, M./The MIT Press/2014/~///The content - source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information
  47. [47] [학술지(정기간행물)] Strømsø, H. I./Reading multiple texts about climate change : The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension/Learning and Instruction/2010/20(3)/192~204//
  48. [48] [단행본] Handbook of individual differences in reading:Reader, text, and context/Van den Broek, P./Routledge/2016/~///Individual differences in reading comprehension
  49. [49] [학술지(정기간행물)] Walraven, A./Information-problem solving : A review of problems students encounter and instructional solutions/Computers in Human Behavior/2008/24(3)/623~648//

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved