Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

The Effects of Individual Differences in Middle School Students on the Calibration Accuracy of the Level of Multiple Text Integration — Focusing on the Mediating Effects of Perceived Task and Text Difficulty

Kim SeongYeup Oh SeongRyeol

Pennsylvania State Univ. 서울과학고등학교

Korea Business Review 60Vol. 4No. pp.87-127 (2025)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2025.60.4.87

Abstract

This study examined the effects of individual difference factors on the level of multiple text integration and the calibration accuracy among 190 seventh-grade students, including the mediating effects of perceived task and text difficulty. Collected data included reading self-efficacy, prior knowledge, multiple text integration product, perceived task and text difficulty, and self-evaluation scores. The PLS-SEM results indicated that reading self-efficacy lowered perceived task and text difficulty while enhancing the level of multiple text integration, and prior knowledge positively predicted the level of multiple text integration. Furthermore, higher perceived task difficulty was associated with greater calibration accuracy of the level of multiple text integration. Finally, the level of multiple text integration was a strong predictor of calibration accuracy. These findings confirm that a reader’s cognitive and affective resources serve as the driving force behind multiple text reading. In addition, the results highlight that accurate self-evaluation is achieved when high reading self-efficacy aligns with reading performance.

Keywords

다문서 읽기다문서 통합과제 난도자기평가 정확도자기조절읽기 효능감사전 지식

References

  1. [1] [보고서] 국어과 교육과정(제2022-33호)/교육부/교육부/2022/~/
  2. [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김성엽/다문서 읽기에서 정보 수용과 관점 재구성 양상 연구: 중학생 독자의 입장을 중심으로/독서연구/2023/68/181~216//
  3. [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김종윤/다문서 읽기 연구의 연구 동향과 전망/국어교육학연구/2014/49(3)/138~163//
  4. [4] [학위논문] 문지연/디지털 읽기 과정의 상충정보 처리 양상: 고등학생의 논쟁적 주제 읽기 과정 유형화를 중심으로/박사/고려대학교 대학원//2025
  5. [5] [학위논문] 오성렬/다문서 통합의 양상과 수준 및 영향 요인에 관한 연구: 고등학교 3학년생의 도해 조직자에 나타난 통합을 중심으로/석사/고려대학교 대학원//2023
  6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] 오성렬/다문서 통합 과제의 난도에 대한 중학생의 인식 연구-통합 수준과의 관계를 중심으로/국어교육학연구/2024/59(4)/159~202//
  7. [7] [학위논문] 오은하/다문서 이해 교육 내용 체계화 연구: 탐색, 통합, 비판을 중심으로/박사/이화여자대학교 대학원//2020
  8. [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이소라/인식론적 신념이 독자 신념과 다문서 읽기 전략에 미치는 영향/독서연구/2017/43/183~212//
  9. [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장성민/고등학생의 자료 통합적 글쓰기에서의 분량에 따른 능숙한 필자와 미숙한 필자의 논증 양상 비교/국어교육학연구/2015/50(3)/193~233//
  10. [10] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장성민/디지털 다문서 환경에서의 읽기·쓰기: 개인차 요인, 다문서 선택과 사용, 쓰기 결과물 사이의 영향 관계/독서연구/2022/65/41~80//
  11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장성민/디지털 환경에서의 다문서 선택, 사용의 영향 요인 분석-어떤 사람이 가짜뉴스, 거짓 정보에 넘어가는가?/국어교육학연구/2022/57(2)/245~294//
  12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] 최숙기/중학생의 읽기 효능감 구성 요인 연구/국어교육학연구/2009/35/507~544//
  13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] Anmarkrud, Ø./Multiple -documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents/Learning and Individual Differences/2014/30/64~76//
  14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] Anmarkrud Ø./Task - oriented reading of multiple documents: Online comprehension processes and offline products/Instructional Science/2013/41/873~894//
  15. [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] Barzilai, S./The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints/Learning and Instruction/2015/36/86~103//
  16. [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] /////~//
  17. [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] Braasch, J. L./The discrepancy -induced source comprehension (D-ISC) model: Basic assumptions and preliminary evidence/Educational Psy chologist/2017/52(3)/167~181//
  18. [18] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten I./Prediction of learning and comprehension when adolescents read multiple texts: The roles of word - level processing, strategic approach, and reading motivation/Reading and Writing/2013/26(3)/321~348//
  19. [19] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten I/Measuring multiple - source based academic writing self - efficacy/Frontiers in Psychology/2023/14/1212567~//
  20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten I./Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change/Learning and Instruction/2011/21(2)/180~192//
  21. [21] [단행본] Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes/Britt, M. A./Cambridge University Press/2012/~///Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition
  22. [22] [보고서] An investigation of the impact of the 6+1 trait writing model on grade 5 student writing achievement. Final report/Coe, M./National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance/2011/~/
  23. [23] [학술지(정기간행물)] Gil, L./Summary versus argument tasks when working with multiple documents: Which is better for whom?/Contemporary Educational Psychology/2010/35(3)/157~173//
  24. [24] [단행본] Handbook of metamemory and memory/Hacker, D. J./Psychology Press/2008/~///Metacognition in education: A focus on calibration
  25. [25] [단행본] A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS - SEM)/Hair, J. F./SAGE Publications/2022/~///
  26. [26] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hair, J. F./PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet/Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice/2011/19(2)/139~151//
  27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hair, J. F./When to use and how to report the results of PLS -SEM/European Business Review/2019/31(1)/2~24//
  28. [28] [학술지(정기간행물)] Jackson, D. L./Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N:q hypothesis/Structural Equation Modeling/2003/10(1)/128~141//
  29. [29] [단행본] Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition/Kintsch, W./Cambridge University Press/1998/~///
  30. [30] [단행본] Principles and practice of structural equation modeling/Kline, R. B./Guilford Press/2023/~///
  31. [31] [학술지(정기간행물)] Le Bigot L./The impact of presentation format, task assignment, and prior knowledge on students' comprehension of multiple online documents/Journal of Literacy Research/2007/39(4)/445~470//
  32. [32] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lee, H. Y./Examining students' self - efficacy and perceptions of task difficulty in learning from multiple texts/Learning and Individual Differences/2021/90/1~15//
  33. [33] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lin L.-M./An assessment of students' calibration of comprehension and calibration of performance using multiple measures/Reading Psychology/2001/22(2)/111~128//
  34. [34] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lin, L.-M./Calibration of comprehension: Research and implications for education and instruction/Contemporary Educational Psychology/1998/23(4)/345~391//
  35. [35] [학술지(정기간행물)] Linderholm T./Multiple science text processing: Building comprehension skills for college student readers/Reading Psychology/2014/35(4)/332~356//
  36. [36] [학술지(정기간행물)] List, A./Analyzing and integrating models of multiple text comprehension/Educational Psychologist/2017/52(3)/143~147//
  37. [37] [단행본] Handbook of multiple source use/List, A./Routledge/2018/~///Cold and warm perspectives on the cognitive affective engagement model of multiple source use
  38. [38] [학술지(정기간행물)] List A/How do students integrate multiple texts? An investigation of top -down processing/European Journal of Psychology of Education/2021/36(3)/599~626//
  39. [39] [학술지(정기간행물)] Mason L/Epistemic metacognition in context: Evaluating and learning online information/Metacognition and Learning/2010/5(1)/67~90//
  40. [40] [학술지(정기간행물)] McCrudden, M. T./Coherence building while reading multiple complementary documents/Contemporary Educational Psychology/2024/77/102266~//
  41. [41] [학술지(정기간행물)] McCrudden M. T./Promoting integration and learning from multiple complementary texts/Journal of Educational Psychology/2022/114(8)/1832~1843//
  42. [42] [단행본] Text relevance and learning from text/McCrudden M. T./IAP Information Age Publishing/2011/~///Toward an integrated view of relevance in text comprehension
  43. [43] [학술지(정기간행물)] McCrudden, M. T./Relevance and goal - focusing in text processing/Educational Psychology Review/2007/19(2)/113~139//
  44. [44] [학술지(정기간행물)] Miller, T. M./Improving metacognitive accuracy: How failing to retrieve practice items reduces overconfidence/Consciousness and Cognition/2014/29/131~140//
  45. [45] [보고서] PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework/OECD/PISA, OECD Publishing/2019/~/
  46. [46] [단행본] PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do/OECD/PISA, OECD Publishing/2019/~///
  47. [47] [보고서] PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education/OECD/PISA, OECD Publishing/2023/~/
  48. [48] [단행본] The construction of mental representations during reading/Perfetti C. A./Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers/1999/~///Toward a theory of documents representation
  49. [49] [학술지(정기간행물)] Ravenscroft, S. P./Accounting students' metacognition: The association of performance, calibration error, and mindset/Issues in Accounting Education/2012/27(3)/707~732//
  50. [50] [학술지(정기간행물)] /////~//
  51. [51] [단행본] Text relevance and learning from text/Schunk, D. H./IAP Information Age Publishing/2002/~///The development of academic self - efficacy
  52. [52] [학술지(정기간행물)] Schunk D. H./Influencing children's self - efficacy and self - regulation of reading and writing through modeling/Reading & Writing Quarterly/2007/23(1)/7~25//
  53. [53] [학술지(정기간행물)] Shmueli, G./The elephant in the room: Evaluating the predictive performance of PLS models/Journal of Business Research/2016/69/4552~4564//
  54. [54] [학술지(정기간행물)] Sperber D./Pragmatics, modularity and mind reading/Mind & Language/2002/17(1-2)/3~23//
  55. [55] [학술지(정기간행물)] Stadtler, M./Dealing with uncertainty: Readers' memory for and use of conflicting information from science texts as function of presentation format and source expertise/Cognition and Instruction/2013/31(2)/130~150//
  56. [56] [학술지(정기간행물)] Unrau, N. J./Can reading self - efficacy be modified? A meta - analysis of the impact of interventions on reading self - efficacy/Review of Educational Research/2018/88(2)/167~204//
  57. [57] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wang, Y./Calibration in multiple text use/Metacognition and Learning/2019/14(2)/131~166//
  58. [58] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wang, Y./Supporting college students' metacognitive monitoring in a biology course through practice and timely monitoring feedback/Metacognition and Learning/2024/19(3)/1~40//
  59. [59] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wiley, J./Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text/Journal of Educational Psychology/1999/91(2)/301~311//
  60. [60] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wineburg, S. S./Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence/Journal of Educational Psychology/1991/83(1)/73~87//
  61. [61] [단행본] The international handbook of collaborative learning/Winne P. H./Routledge/2013/~///Metacognition and computer-supported collaborative learning
  62. [62] [단행본] Handbook of self - regulation/Zimmerman, B. J./Academic Press/2000/~///Attaining self - regulation: A social cognitive perspective

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved