초록

키워드

참고문헌

1. [1] [보고서] 국어과 교육과정(제2022-33호)/교육부/교육부/2022/~/
2. [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김성엽/다문서 읽기에서 정보 수용과 관점 재구성 양상 연구: 중학생 독자의 입장을 중심으로/독서연구/2023/68/181~216//
3. [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김종윤/다문서 읽기 연구의 연구 동향과 전망/국어교육학연구/2014/49(3)/138~163//
4. [4] [학위논문] 문지연/디지털 읽기 과정의 상충정보 처리 양상: 고등학생의 논쟁적 주제 읽기 과정 유형화를 중심으로/박사/고려대학교 대학원//2025
5. [5] [학위논문] 오성렬/다문서 통합의 양상과 수준 및 영향 요인에 관한 연구: 고등학교 3학년생의 도해 조직자에 나타난 통합을 중심으로/석사/고려대학교 대학원//2023
6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] 오성렬/다문서 통합 과제의 난도에 대한 중학생의 인식 연구-통합 수준과의 관계를 중심으로/국어교육학연구/2024/59(4)/159~202//
7. [7] [학위논문] 오은하/다문서 이해 교육 내용 체계화 연구: 탐색, 통합, 비판을 중심으로/박사/이화여자대학교 대학원//2020
8. [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이소라/인식론적 신념이 독자 신념과 다문서 읽기 전략에 미치는 영향/독서연구/2017/43/183~212//
9. [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장성민/고등학생의 자료 통합적 글쓰기에서의 분량에 따른 능숙한 필자와 미숙한 필자의 논증 양상 비교/국어교육학연구/2015/50(3)/193~233//
10. [10] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장성민/디지털 다문서 환경에서의 읽기·쓰기: 개인차 요인, 다문서 선택과 사용, 쓰기 결과물 사이의 영향 관계/독서연구/2022/65/41~80//
11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장성민/디지털 환경에서의 다문서 선택, 사용의 영향 요인 분석-어떤 사람이 가짜뉴스, 거짓 정보에 넘어가는가?/국어교육학연구/2022/57(2)/245~294//
12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] 최숙기/중학생의 읽기 효능감 구성 요인 연구/국어교육학연구/2009/35/507~544//
13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] Anmarkrud, Ø./Multiple -documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents/Learning and Individual Differences/2014/30/64~76//
14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] Anmarkrud Ø./Task - oriented reading of multiple documents: Online comprehension processes and offline products/Instructional Science/2013/41/873~894//
15. [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] Barzilai, S./The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints/Learning and Instruction/2015/36/86~103//
16. [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] /////~//
17. [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] Braasch, J. L./The discrepancy -induced source comprehension (D-ISC) model: Basic assumptions and preliminary evidence/Educational Psy chologist/2017/52(3)/167~181//
18. [18] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten I./Prediction of learning and comprehension when adolescents read multiple texts: The roles of word - level processing, strategic approach, and reading motivation/Reading and Writing/2013/26(3)/321~348//
19. [19] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten I/Measuring multiple - source based academic writing self - efficacy/Frontiers in Psychology/2023/14/1212567~//
20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten I./Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change/Learning and Instruction/2011/21(2)/180~192//
21. [21] [단행본] Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes/Britt, M. A./Cambridge University Press/2012/~///Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition
22. [22] [보고서] An investigation of the impact of the 6+1 trait writing model on grade 5 student writing achievement. Final report/Coe, M./National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance/2011/~/
23. [23] [학술지(정기간행물)] Gil, L./Summary versus argument tasks when working with multiple documents: Which is better for whom?/Contemporary Educational Psychology/2010/35(3)/157~173//
24. [24] [단행본] Handbook of metamemory and memory/Hacker, D. J./Psychology Press/2008/~///Metacognition in education: A focus on calibration
25. [25] [단행본] A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS - SEM)/Hair, J. F./SAGE Publications/2022/~///
26. [26] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hair, J. F./PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet/Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice/2011/19(2)/139~151//
27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hair, J. F./When to use and how to report the results of PLS -SEM/European Business Review/2019/31(1)/2~24//
28. [28] [학술지(정기간행물)] Jackson, D. L./Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N:q hypothesis/Structural Equation Modeling/2003/10(1)/128~141//
29. [29] [단행본] Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition/Kintsch, W./Cambridge University Press/1998/~///
30. [30] [단행본] Principles and practice of structural equation modeling/Kline, R. B./Guilford Press/2023/~///
31. [31] [학술지(정기간행물)] Le Bigot L./The impact of presentation format, task assignment, and prior knowledge on students' comprehension of multiple online documents/Journal of Literacy Research/2007/39(4)/445~470//
32. [32] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lee, H. Y./Examining students' self - efficacy and perceptions of task difficulty in learning from multiple texts/Learning and Individual Differences/2021/90/1~15//
33. [33] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lin L.-M./An assessment of students' calibration of comprehension and calibration of performance using multiple measures/Reading Psychology/2001/22(2)/111~128//
34. [34] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lin, L.-M./Calibration of comprehension: Research and implications for education and instruction/Contemporary Educational Psychology/1998/23(4)/345~391//
35. [35] [학술지(정기간행물)] Linderholm T./Multiple science text processing: Building comprehension skills for college student readers/Reading Psychology/2014/35(4)/332~356//
36. [36] [학술지(정기간행물)] List, A./Analyzing and integrating models of multiple text comprehension/Educational Psychologist/2017/52(3)/143~147//
37. [37] [단행본] Handbook of multiple source use/List, A./Routledge/2018/~///Cold and warm perspectives on the cognitive affective engagement model of multiple source use
38. [38] [학술지(정기간행물)] List A/How do students integrate multiple texts? An investigation of top -down processing/European Journal of Psychology of Education/2021/36(3)/599~626//
39. [39] [학술지(정기간행물)] Mason L/Epistemic metacognition in context: Evaluating and learning online information/Metacognition and Learning/2010/5(1)/67~90//
40. [40] [학술지(정기간행물)] McCrudden, M. T./Coherence building while reading multiple complementary documents/Contemporary Educational Psychology/2024/77/102266~//
41. [41] [학술지(정기간행물)] McCrudden M. T./Promoting integration and learning from multiple complementary texts/Journal of Educational Psychology/2022/114(8)/1832~1843//
42. [42] [단행본] Text relevance and learning from text/McCrudden M. T./IAP Information Age Publishing/2011/~///Toward an integrated view of relevance in text comprehension
43. [43] [학술지(정기간행물)] McCrudden, M. T./Relevance and goal - focusing in text processing/Educational Psychology Review/2007/19(2)/113~139//
44. [44] [학술지(정기간행물)] Miller, T. M./Improving metacognitive accuracy: How failing to retrieve practice items reduces overconfidence/Consciousness and Cognition/2014/29/131~140//
45. [45] [보고서] PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework/OECD/PISA, OECD Publishing/2019/~/
46. [46] [단행본] PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do/OECD/PISA, OECD Publishing/2019/~///
47. [47] [보고서] PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education/OECD/PISA, OECD Publishing/2023/~/
48. [48] [단행본] The construction of mental representations during reading/Perfetti C. A./Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers/1999/~///Toward a theory of documents representation
49. [49] [학술지(정기간행물)] Ravenscroft, S. P./Accounting students' metacognition: The association of performance, calibration error, and mindset/Issues in Accounting Education/2012/27(3)/707~732//
50. [50] [학술지(정기간행물)] /////~//
51. [51] [단행본] Text relevance and learning from text/Schunk, D. H./IAP Information Age Publishing/2002/~///The development of academic self - efficacy
52. [52] [학술지(정기간행물)] Schunk D. H./Influencing children's self - efficacy and self - regulation of reading and writing through modeling/Reading & Writing Quarterly/2007/23(1)/7~25//
53. [53] [학술지(정기간행물)] Shmueli, G./The elephant in the room: Evaluating the predictive performance of PLS models/Journal of Business Research/2016/69/4552~4564//
54. [54] [학술지(정기간행물)] Sperber D./Pragmatics, modularity and mind reading/Mind & Language/2002/17(1-2)/3~23//
55. [55] [학술지(정기간행물)] Stadtler, M./Dealing with uncertainty: Readers' memory for and use of conflicting information from science texts as function of presentation format and source expertise/Cognition and Instruction/2013/31(2)/130~150//
56. [56] [학술지(정기간행물)] Unrau, N. J./Can reading self - efficacy be modified? A meta - analysis of the impact of interventions on reading self - efficacy/Review of Educational Research/2018/88(2)/167~204//
57. [57] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wang, Y./Calibration in multiple text use/Metacognition and Learning/2019/14(2)/131~166//
58. [58] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wang, Y./Supporting college students' metacognitive monitoring in a biology course through practice and timely monitoring feedback/Metacognition and Learning/2024/19(3)/1~40//
59. [59] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wiley, J./Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text/Journal of Educational Psychology/1999/91(2)/301~311//
60. [60] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wineburg, S. S./Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence/Journal of Educational Psychology/1991/83(1)/73~87//
61. [61] [단행본] The international handbook of collaborative learning/Winne P. H./Routledge/2013/~///Metacognition and computer-supported collaborative learning
62. [62] [단행본] Handbook of self - regulation/Zimmerman, B. J./Academic Press/2000/~///Attaining self - regulation: A social cognitive perspective