Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

Qualitative Measures Methods of Text Complexity for Text Leveling

Choi, Sook-Ki

한국교육과정평가원

Korea Business Review 43No. pp.487-522 (2012)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2012..43.487

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to investigate the Qualitative Measures Methods of Text Complexity for text leveling. Text complexity model suggested by CCSS for reading standards is very useful tool. Text complexity provide a common scale for measuring text difficulty and student reading ability. Quantitative measures or readability formulas stand as proxies for semantic and syntactic complexity(word length; word frequency/familiarity, sentence length and text length). But Quantitative measures are less valid for Poetry. Qualitative measures sometimes complement and adjust quantitative measures of text complexity. Qualitative factors of text complexity are purpose, language conventionality and clarity, text structures, knowledge demands. To explore qualitative measures methods of text complexity, 25 Korean language teachers assessed 9 overlapping textbook material using rubric for literary and informational text. The Qualitative measures methods of text complexity involves making an informed decision about the difficulty of a text in terms of one or more factors discernible to a human reader applying trained judgment to the task.

Keywords

공통 중핵 성취기준텍스트 복잡도텍스트 위계화국어 교과서질적 요인질적 요인 평가

References

  1. [1] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김대희/독서 수준과 텍스트 수준의 위계화 방안에 대한 비판적 고찰/국어교육학연구/2011/(41)/147~168/국어교육학회/
  2. [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 서혁/읽기(독서) 교육 체계화를 위한 텍스트 복잡도(Text Complexity) 상세화 연구 (1) －텍스트 복잡도 연구의 비판적 고찰을 중심으로-/국어교육학연구/2011/(42)/433~460/국어교육학회/
  3. [3] [학술대회논문] 서혁/중등 국어과 교과서 텍스트의 수준과 적합성 검토/한국독서학회 가을학술대회 발표자료집/2011//92~107/
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 윤영선/발달단계에 따른 읽기지도모형 개발과 모형의 타당성 연구/교육평가연구/2001/14(1)/199~222//
  5. [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이성영/초등 교과서의 이독성 비교 연구 －국어, 사회, 과학 교과서를 중심으로－/국어교육학연구/2011/(41)/169~193/국어교육학회/
  6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] 조병영/국어과 교육과정의 내용 조직과 진술에 관한 연구-미국, 영국, 일본의 자국어 교육과정 검토를 중심으로-/국어교육/2002/109(109)/6~194/한국어교육학회/
  7. [7] [학술지(정기간행물)] 조석주/Readability 공식의 개관/영어영문학/1983/29(2)/499~514//
  8. [8] [학위논문] 曺奭柱/英語 Readability 의 測定分析 - 고등학교 영어교과서 를 중심 으로 -/박사/전북대학교//1985
  9. [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 조일영/한국어 교육에서 텍스트 자료 수준 평가방안에 관한 연구：양적, 질적 이독성 공식 개발을 중심으로/한국어문교육/2006/15/5~72//
  10. [10] [학술지(정기간행물)] 차배근/국문 독이성 측정 방법 개발을 위한 서설적 소고/서울대 신문연구소 학보/1988/25/113~132//
  11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] 정혜승/글 난도(difficulty) 평가를 위한 질적 방법 연구/국어교육/2010/131(131)/523~549/한국어교육학회/
  12. [12] [학위논문] 최숙기/중학생의 읽기 능력 발달 양상에 관한 연구/박사/한국교원대학교 대학원//2010
  13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] 최숙기/공통핵심교육과정(CCSS)의 읽기 텍스트 위계화 방안에 관한 연구/교육과정평가연구/2011/14(2)/1~29/한국교육과정평가원/
  14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bailin, A./The linguistic assumptions underlying readability formulae：A critique/Language and Communication/2001/21(3)/285~301//
  15. [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] Brown, R./How shall a thing be called?/Psychological Review/1958/65(1)/14~21//
  16. [16] [단행본] An Analysis of Textbooks in Relation to Declining SAT Scores/Chall, J./Educational Testing Service/1977/~///
  17. [17] [단행본] Stages of Reading Development(Second Edition)/Chall, J./Harcourt Brace College Publishers/1996/~///
  18. [18] [단행본] Readability Revisited：The New Dale-Chall Readability Formula/Chall, J./Brookline Books/1995/~///
  19. [19] [단행본] Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects/Common Core State Standards Initiative/CCSSO & National Governors Association/2010/~///
  20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] Cunningham, J. W./Investigating the instructional supportiveness of leveled texts/Reading Research Quarterly/2005/40(4)/410~449//
  21. [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] Cohen, J. H./The effects of content are material on cloze test performance/Journal of Reading/1975/19(3)/247~250//
  22. [22] [인터넷자원] Coh-Metrix (Version 2.0) (Software). Memphis, TN：University of Memphis, Institute for Intelligent Systems/http://cohmetrix.memphis.edu/cohmetrixpr/index.html////
  23. [23] [학술지(정기간행물)] Dale, E./Formula for predicting readability/Educational Research Bulletin/1948/27/37~53//
  24. [24] [학술지(정기간행물)] Das, S./Readability modelling and comparison of one and two parametric fit：A case study in Bangla/Journal of Quantitative Linguistics/2006/13/17~34//
  25. [25] [학술지(정기간행물)] Davison, A./On the failure of readability formulas to define readable texts：A case study from adaptations/Reading Research Quarterly/1982/17/187~209//
  26. [26] [학술지(정기간행물)] Flesch, R./Measuring the level of abstraction/Journal of Applied Psychology/1950/34/384~390//
  27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] Fry, E./A readability formula that saves time/Journal of Reading/1968/11(7)/265~71//
  28. [28] [학술지(정기간행물)] Fry, E./Fry's readability graph：Clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17/Journal of Reading/1977/21/242~252//
  29. [29] [단행본] Qualitative Assessment of Text Difficulty/Chall, Jeanne S/BROOKLINE BOOKS/1996/~///
  30. [30] [단행본] Matching reading materials to readers：The role of readability estimates in conjunction with other information about comprehensibility. In Reading, thinking, and concept development/Klare, G. R./College Entrance Examination Board/1985/~///
  31. [31] [단행본] A multidimensional framework to evaluate reading assessment tools, In Reading comprehension strategies：Theories, interventions, and technologies/Magliano, J. P./Erlbaum/2007/107~136///
  32. [32] [보고서] Coh-Metrix：Automated cohesion and coherence scores to predict readability and facilitate comprehension/McNamara, D. S./University of Memphis./2002/~/
  33. [33] [학술대회논문] McNamara, D. S./Coh-Metrix：Capturing linguistic features of cohesion/Discourse Processes/2010/47/292~330/
  34. [34] [학술대회논문] Miltsakaki, E./Read-X：Automatic evaluation of reading difficulty of web text/Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007/2007//7280~7286/
  35. [35] [학술지(정기간행물)] Schriver, K. A./Readability formulas in the new millennium：What’s the use?/ACM Journal of Computer Documentation/2000/24(3)/138~140//
  36. [36] [학술지(정기간행물)] Spache, G. D./A new readability formula for primary-grade reading materials/Elementary School Journal/1953/53/410~413//
  37. [37] [단행본] Text Complexity, the Text Complexity Continuum, and Developing Expertise in Reading/Stenner, A J/MetaMetrics//~///

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved