Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

A Study of Peer Feedback Opinion Validity by Types in Writing

Seo, Young Jin Jeon Eun-ju

부산대학교

Korea Business Review 44No. pp.369-395 (2012)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2012..44.369

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore ways that enhance the impact of peer feedback activities by analyzing the validity of feedback opinion types. This study categorized feedback opinions provided by peer students in rewriting and tried to find out the concrete aspects of the feedbacks. This paper analyzed 40 pieces of first drafts, feedback opinions, amended drafts of the 11th grade students' writing. The total number of peer feedback comments were 384 and four Korean teachers assessed validity of these feedback opinions. As a result, average validity was 72.7%. The result shows that peer feedback ensures the validity of more than a certain level. Meanwhile, as a result of the analysis by types, friendly feedbacks have more validity than critical feedbacks. Feedbacks to provide an alternative have more validity than vague and cursory feedbacks and ones to point out an error. Feedbacks on areas of expressions have more validity than feedbacks on contents and structures.

Keywords

작문동료 피드백피드백 유형타당도

References

  1. [1] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김남미/대학 글쓰기수업에서의 동료평가 결과 연구/한민족문화연구/2009/30(30)/151~180/한민족문화학회/
  2. [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박상민/첨삭지도에 대한 학습자 요구분석과 효율적인 첨삭지도 방법/작문연구/2011/(13)/350~380/한국작문학회/
  3. [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박은영/웹기반 영작문교육에서의 동료수정 양상 연구/영어어문교육/2004/10(1)/107~126/한국영어어문교육학회/
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 오택환/인터넷 게시판 글쓰기에 나타난 동료평가의 양상과 유형/청람어문교육/2009/(40)/235~262/청람어문교육학회/
  5. [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이은자/교사 첨삭 피드백의 원리와 방법/작문연구/2009/(9)/123~152/한국작문학회/
  6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이지연/한국 대학생의 영작문 활동 시 나타나는 동료피드백의 양상 및 이에 대한 인식/현대영어교육/2010/11(3)/134~161/현대영어교육학회/
  7. [7] [학술지(정기간행물)] 정희모/대학생 글쓰기의 수정 방법에 관한 실험 연구 －자기첨삭, 동료첨삭, 교수첨삭의 효과를 중심으로－/국어교육학연구/2008/(33)/657~685/국어교육학회/
  8. [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] 조인록/글쓰기 지도를 위한 초등학생 자기평가의 타당성 및 효과성/초등교육연구/2009/22(2)/185~204/한국초등교육학회/
  9. [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김양희/The effectiveness of diverse types of written feedback: Comparative study of teacher and student feedback./영어어문교육/2010/16(4)/133~152/한국영어어문교육학회/
  10. [10] [학술지(정기간행물)] 최선경/첨삭지도를 통한 글쓰기 교육 방안 - 분석-진단-처방-협의의 4단계 동료첨삭 모형을 중심으로 -/한민족문화연구/2010/35(35)/301~331/한민족문화학회/
  11. [11] [단행본] 글쓰기의 문제 해결 전략/Flower, L/동문선/1998/~///
  12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] Beach, R./The effects of between-draft teacher evaluation versus student self-evaluation on high school student's revising of rough drafts/Research in the Teaching of English/1979/13(2)/111~119//
  13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bitchener, J./The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback/ELT Journal/2009/63(3)/204~211//
  14. [14] [학위논문] Buhrke, L./Improving Fourth Grade Students' Writing Skills and Attitudes, Additional information about the document that does not fit in any of the other fields/석사/Saint Xavier University//2002
  15. [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] Chenoweth, N. A./The need to teach rewriting/ELT Journal/1987/41/25~29//
  16. [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] Clifford, J./Composing in stages：The effects of a collaborative pedagogy/Research in the Teaching of English/1981/15(1)/37~53//
  17. [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] Connor, U./Peer response groups in ESL writing classes：How much impact on revision?/Journal of Second Language Writing/1994/3(3)/257~276//
  18. [18] [학술대회논문] Danis, F/Weaving the Web of Meaning：Interaction Patterns in Peer-Response Groups/Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication/1982//~/
  19. [19] [학술지(정기간행물)] Dheram, P. K./Feedback as a two-bullock cart：A case study of teaching writing/ELT Journal/1995/49(2)/160~168//
  20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] Holt, M./The Value of Written Peer Criticism/College Composition and Communication/1992/43(3)/384~392//
  21. [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hyland, K./Providing productive feedback/ELT Journal/1990/44/279~285//
  22. [22] [학술지(정기간행물)] Keh, C. L./Feedback in the writing process：A model and methods for implementation/ELT Journal/1990/44(4)/294~304//
  23. [23] [학술지(정기간행물)] Leki, I./Preferences of ESL students for error correction in college level writing classes/Foreign Language Annals/1991/24(3)/203~218//
  24. [24] [학술지(정기간행물)] McGarrell, H./Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback/ELT Journal/2007/61(3)/228~236//
  25. [25] [학술지(정기간행물)] Sweeney, M. R./Relating Revision Skills to Teacher Commentary/Teaching English in the Two-Year College/1999/27(2)/213~218//
  26. [26] [학술지(정기간행물)] Villamil, O.S./Peer revisions in the L2 classroom/Journal of Second Language Writing/1996/5(1)/51~57//
  27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] Zhang, S./Re-examining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class/Journal of Second Language Writing/1995/4(3)/209~222//

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved