Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

The Impact of Giving and Receiving Peer Feedback among Middle School Students — Moderating Effect of Writing Self-efficacy

Gyeonghoon Yoon Kim, Hyeyoun

동국대학교 동국대학교

Korea Business Review 59Vol. 2No. pp.109-138 (2024)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2024.59.2.109

Abstract

Despite the educational significance of peer feedback, previous research has mainly focused on the receiving of feedback, with less attention on the effects of the act of providing feedback itself. This study aimed to investigate the effects of peer feedback in terms of both providing and receiving feedback, considering different types of feedback and the influence of writing self-efficacy on these effects for a more nuanced discussion. A total of 123 middle school students participated in the study in which they provided and received feedback on the first draft and then revised their writing accordingly. Peer feedback was coded based on the criteria established in previous research. Relationships between variables were analyzed using a multiple multivariate regression analysis. Results revealed that, unlike receiving feedback, certain types of feedback had significant effects on revised writing when given by peers. The participants’ awareness of feedback activities was evident for some types of feedback in both the providing and receiving dimensions.

Keywords

작문교육동료 피드백동료 평가쓰기 효능감중학교협동 작문

References

  1. [1] [학술지(정기간행물)] 가은아/쓰기 태도 및 쓰기 효능감 발달 연구-6학년에서 10학년 학생들을 대상으로/국어교육학연구/2010/37/159~183//
  2. [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 권태현/고등학생의 쓰기 효능감과 서술형 및 논술형 평가 결과의 상관관계-고등학교 2학년 문학 과목을 중심으로/국어교육학연구/2012/44/37~66//
  3. [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김수정/동료피드백을 활용한 인성교육 방안과 적용에 대한 질적 고찰/국어교육학연구/2018/53(2)/32~78//
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김혜연/협동 글쓰기의 국내외 연구 동향에 대한 체계적 문헌 고찰/작문연구/2017/34/7~49//
  5. [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영민/우리나라 학생들의 쓰기 효능감 발달 연구/새국어교육/2009/82/95~125//
  6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] 백혜선/대학생의 쓰기 효능감 양상 연구/리터러시 연구/2018/9(1)/101~126//
  7. [7] [학술지(정기간행물)] 서수현/대학생의 보고서에 대한 동료 반응과 그 수용 양상/국어교육학연구/2011/41/447~472//
  8. [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] 서영진/작문 활동에서 동료 피드백 의견 유형별 수용도 연구/국어교육학연구/2012/45/215~244//
  9. [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 서영진/작문 활동에서 동료 피드백 의견의 유형별 타당도 연구/국어교육학연구/2012/44/369~395//
  10. [10] [학술지(정기간행물)] 양경희/쓰기 과제의 주제 상세화에 따른 쓰기 능력과 쓰기 효능감 관계에 대한 교육적 함의/우리말교육현장연구/2017/11(2)/203~229//
  11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] 원진숙/비대면 온라인 수업 상황에서의 디지털 플랫폼 기반 대학 글쓰기 교육 사례 연구-Google Docs를 활용한 글쓰기 워크숍 활동을 중심으로/국어교육학연구/2022/57(1)/45~81//
  12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] 윤경훈/중학생의 동료 피드백과 글쓰기 수행의 관계-내용 생성하기 단계를 중심으로/리터러시연구/2022/13(4)/77~116//
  13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이윤빈/대학생 필자의 동료 피드백 수용 양상 연구-동료 피드백에 대한 필자의 반응 및 수정고 반영 양상을 중심으로/작문연구/2014/21/201~234//
  14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이윤빈/대학생 글쓰기에서 동료 피드백의 양상 및 타당도 연구/작문연구/2014/20/299~334//
  15. [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이윤빈/모둠 구성원의 쓰기 수준 차이에 따른 대학생 동료 피드백 활동의 양상 및 효과/국어교육/2016/154/127~164//
  16. [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이정연/교사 피드백이 외국인 유학생의 쓰기 능력과 쓰기 효능감에 미치는 영향 연구/외국어로서의 한국어교육/2021/60/63~91//
  17. [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] 임지원/동료 피드백 제공 활동과 수용 활동이 논증적 글쓰기에 미치는 영향/국어교육/2022/179/101~130//
  18. [18] [단행본] 글쓰기 교육과 협력학습/정희모/삼인/2006/~///
  19. [19] [학술지(정기간행물)] 한경숙/중학생의 쓰기에 제시된 동료 피드백의 유형과 수용 양상 연구-중학교 2학년 학생을 대상으로/작문연구/2014/23/147~174//
  20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] Aben, J. E. J./What influences students’ peer-feedback uptake? Relations between error tolerance, feedback tolerance, writing self-efficacy, perceived language skills and peer-feedback processing/Learning and Individual Differences/2022/97/102175~//
  21. [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] Allen, D./Relative second language proficiency and the giving and receiving of written peer feedback/System/2016/56/96~106//
  22. [22] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bandura, A./Self-efficacy : toward a unifying theory of behavioral change/Psychological Review/1977/84(2)/191~215//
  23. [23] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bruning, R./Examining Dimensions of Self-Efficacy for Writing/Journal of Educational Psychology/2013/105(1)/25~38//
  24. [24] [학술지(정기간행물)] Cao, Z./A qualitative inquiry into undergraduates’ learning from giving and receiving peer feedback in L2 writing : Insights from a case study/Studies in Educational Evaluation/2019/63/102~112//
  25. [25] [학술지(정기간행물)] Cho, K./Student revision with peer and expert reviewing/Learning and Instruction/2010/20(4)/328~338//
  26. [26] [학술지(정기간행물)] Cui, Y./Effects of Trained Peer vs. Teacher Feedback on EFL Students’ Writing Performance, Self-Efficacy, and Internalization of Motivation/Frontiers in Psychology/2021/12/788474~//
  27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] Dillenbourg, P./The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts/International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning/2008/3(1)/5~23//
  28. [28] [학술지(정기간행물)] Gielen, M./Structuring peer assessment : Comparing the impact of the degree of structure on peer feedback content/Computers in Human Behavior/2015/52/315~325//
  29. [29] [학술지(정기간행물)] Graham, S./Knowledge of writing and the composing process, attitude toward writing, and self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities/Journal of Learning Disabilities/1993/26(4)/237~249//
  30. [30] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hovardas, T./Peer versus expert feedback : An investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school students/Computers & Education/2014/71(Supplement C)/133~152//
  31. [31] [학술지(정기간행물)] Martinez, C. T./Pain and pleasure in short essay writing : Factors predicting university students’ writing anxiety and writing self-efficacy/Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy/2011/54(5)/351~360//
  32. [32] [학술지(정기간행물)] Mitchell, K. M./Development and validation of the Situated Academic Writing Self-Efficacy Scale(SAWSES)/Assessing Writing/2021/48/100524~//
  33. [33] [학술지(정기간행물)] Pajares, F./Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students’ writing/The Journal of Educational Research/1997/90(6)/353~360//
  34. [34] [학술지(정기간행물)] Paul, N./The role of achievement goal orientations in the relationships between high school students’ anxiety, self-efficacy, and perceived use of revision strategies in argumentative writing/Journal of Writing Research/2021/12(3)/657~684//
  35. [35] [학술지(정기간행물)] Rouhi, A./Peer review : Is Giving Corrective Feedback Better than Receiving it in L2 Writing?/Procedia-Social and Beavioral Sciences/2013/93/1349~1354//
  36. [36] [학술지(정기간행물)] Strijbos, J. -W./Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks : Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?/Learning and Instruction/2010/20(4)/291~303//

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved