Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

Effects of Sequential Feedback from AI, Peers, and Instructors on College Students’ Writing Performance

LEE YUN BIN

덕성여자대학교

Korea Business Review 60Vol. 4No. pp.241-281 (2025)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2025.60.4.241

Abstract

This study proposes a stepwise feedback model involving AI, peers, and instructors, each with a distinct role, and examines its effects in a college writing context. AI addressed structural and linguistic forms; peers contributed content-level reader responses; and instructors provided integrated feedback that combined both aspects. Students revised their argumentative essays three times while actively engaging with each feedback source. The findings indicate high feedback uptake and significant writing improvement at each stage. AI feedback improved formal accuracy with sustained effects, peer feedback enhanced authorial agency through critical reader interpretation, and instructor feedback was consolidated and refined before revisions. Each feedback type uniquely fostered self-revision, suggesting that the model reduces cognitive load, supports focused revisions, and promotes both critical reception and authorial voice.

Keywords

대학 글쓰기단계적 피드백AI 피드백동료 피드백교수자 피드백피드백 수용

References

  1. [1] [학술지(정기간행물)] 공성수/대학 글쓰기 피드백 연구의 경향과 시사점/리터러시연구/2022/13(3)/153~214//
  2. [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김민정/고차원적 사고 유형 과제에 대한 교수자 피드백, 동료 피드백, 생성형 AI 피드백의 비교/교육방법연구/2024/36(4)/337~359//
  3. [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김연희/과정 중심의 작문 수업에서 교사 피드백과 동료 피드백의 유형 및 특징/언어학연구/2013/29/1~26//
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김은선/교사와 인공지능 글쓰기 피드백에 대한 초등학생의 반응/한국초등국어교육/2025/80/5~35//
  5. [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박혜림/AI 피드백을 활용한 디지털 글쓰기 프로그램의 효과 분석/사물인터넷융복합논문지/2025/11(2)/15~22//
  6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] 심지연/생성형 AI를 활용한 한국어 쓰기 피드백 방안/Journal of Korean Culture/2024/67/45~79//
  7. [7] [학술지(정기간행물)] 안효원/AI 코스웨어의 글쓰기 피드백에 대한 교사 인식 연구/새국어교육/2025/142/183~214//
  8. [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이유나/ChatGPT 피드백과 동료 피드백이 중학생 글쓰기 능력에 미치는 영향/교육방법연구/2024/36(2)/111~137//
  9. [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이윤빈/대학생 글쓰기에서 동료 피드백의 양상 및 타당도 연구/작문연구/2014/20/299~334//
  10. [10] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이윤빈/대학 글쓰기 교육에서 교수자·동료·AI 피드백의 특성 및 타당도 비교 - 대학생 글쓰기의 전형적 문제를 포함한 논증적 글을 중심으로/교양교육연구/2025/19(3)/19~33//
  11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] 정유남/대학 글쓰기 수업에서 학생 인식 기반 AI 피드백의 효용성 연구/교양교육연구/2024/18(5)/159~173//
  12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] 정희모/대학생 글쓰기의 수정 방법에 관한 실험 연구-자기첨삭, 동료첨삭, 교수첨삭의 효과를 중심으로/국어교육학연구/2008/33/657~685//
  13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] AlGhamdi, R./Exploring the impact of ChatGPT-generated feedback on technical writing skills of computing students: A blinded study/Education and Information Technologies/2024/29(14)/18901~18926//
  14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] Banihashem S. K./Feedback sources in essay writing: peer-generated or AI - generated feedback?/International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education/2024/21(1)/23~//
  15. [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bogolepova, S. V./Potential of artificial intelligence tools for text evaluation and feedback provision/Professional Discourse & Communication/2025/7(1)/70~88//
  16. [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] Carless, D./The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback/Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education/2018/43(8)/1315~1325//
  17. [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] Chan S./Leveraging generative AI for enhancing university - level English writing/Cogent Education/2025/12(1)/2440182~//
  18. [18] [단행본] Task - based language learning and teaching/Ellis, R./OUP/2001/~///
  19. [19] [학술지(정기간행물)] Escalante J./AI - generated feedback on writing: Insights into efficacy and ENL student preference/International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education/2023/20(57)/1~20//
  20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] Fatmah E. N./Teachers' Practice of Form-Focused Feedback in Writing Classroom Teaching Writing At SMK N 1 Blado, Batang/English Education Journal/2022/12(2)/284~292//
  21. [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] Gielen, S./Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning/Learning and instruction/2010/20(4)/304~315//
  22. [22] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hovardas T./Peer versus expert feedback: An investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school students/Computers & Education/2014/71/133~152//
  23. [23] [단행본] Writing and identity (Vol. 10)/Ivanič R./John Benjamins Publishing Company/1998/~///
  24. [24] [학술지(정기간행물)] Jiang, Y./Interaction and dialogue: Integration and application of artificial intelligence in blended mode writing feedback/The Internet and Higher Education/2025/64/100975~//
  25. [25] [학술대회논문] Ji, J./Feedback Sources in Argumentative Writing: AI Feedback or Peer Feedback?/Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2025/2025//1242~1246/International Society of the Learning Sciences
  26. [26] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lightbown, P. M./Focus -on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning/Studies in Second Language Acquisition/1990/12(4)/429~448//
  27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] Mirsanjari, Z./The Effectiveness of Blended Feedback in EFL Learners' Essay Writing and Their Perceptions/International Journal of Research in English Education/2024/9(4)/17~32//
  28. [28] [학술지(정기간행물)] Nelson G. L./ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups/Journal of second language writing/1998/7(2)/113~131//
  29. [29] [학술지(정기간행물)] Oley, N./Extra credit and peer tutoring: Impact on the quality of writing in introductory psychology in an open admissions college/Teaching of Psychology/1992/19(2)/78~81//
  30. [30] [학술지(정기간행물)] Paulus, T. M./The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing/Journal of second language writing/1999/8(3)/265~289//
  31. [31] [학술지(정기간행물)] Renati, D./The impact of teacher's feedback on students' writing ability/Journal of English Teaching and Research/2024/9(1)/105~113//
  32. [32] [학술지(정기간행물)] Silver, R./What does it take to make a change? Teacher feedback and student revisions/English Teaching: Practice and Critique/2007/6(1)/25~49//
  33. [33] [학술지(정기간행물)] Sperber L./Peer and AI Review+ Reflection (PAIRR): A human-centered approach to formative assessment/Computers and Composition/2025/76/102921~//
  34. [34] [학술지(정기간행물)] Steiss J./Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students' writing/Learning and Instruction/2024/91/101894~//
  35. [35] [학술지(정기간행물)] Topping K./Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities/Review of educational Research/1998/68(3)/249~276//
  36. [36] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wang Z./The effects of teacher feedback and automated feedback on cognitive and psychological aspects of foreign language writing: A mixed-methods research/Frontiers in Psychology/2022/13/1~16//
  37. [37] [학술지(정기간행물)] Yang M/A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class/Journal of second language writing/2006/15(3)/179~200//
  38. [38] [기타자료] Yoon, S. -Y./Evaluation of ChatGPT feedback on ELL writers' coherence and cohesion/arXiv/2023/~//
  39. [39] [학술지(정기간행물)] Zacharias, N. T./Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher feedback/RELC Journal/2007/38(1)/38~52//
  40. [40] [학술지(정기간행물)] Zeevy-Solovey, O./Comparing peer, ChatGPT, and teacher corrective feedback in EFL writing: Students' perceptions and preferences/Technology in Language Teaching & Learning/2024/6(3)/1482~1482//
  41. [41] [학술지(정기간행물)] Zhang Z. V./Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach/Assessing Writing/2022/51/100586~//

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved