Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

A Study of Peer Feedback Opinion Acceptance by Types in Writing

Seo, Young Jin

한국교육과정평가원

Korea Business Review 45No. pp.215-244 (2012)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2012..45.215

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore ways that enhance the impact of peer feedback activities by analyzing the acceptance of feedback opinion types. This study categorized feedback opinions provided by peer students in rewriting and tried to find out the concrete aspects of the feedbacks acceptance. For this purpose, 40 students in the 11th grade were asked to write first drafts, give feedback opinions and make amended drafts. With the total of 384 peer feedback comments, selfassessment forms were filled out to find how they were accepted. As a result 262 peer feedback comments were found to be accepted accounting for 68.23%. There were higher percentages of acceptance in part, creative conversions, and autonomous alternatives rather than acceptance in full. Regarding detailed types with characteristics, areas and degrees, there was more acceptances in friendly feedbacks than critical ones. In addition,it is found that more acceptance is made in expression areas than content and structure areas. Futher, comment and alternative suggestion feedbacks were highly accepted in comparison with error pointing out feedbacks. Having traced feedbacks of acceptance aspects and causes by type, it is likely that a degree of acceptance of feedback comments can be raised by following measures. First, for those who accept feedbacks,motivation to write better, open mind to peer opinions and resolution to rewrite drastically and positively when necessary is requested. Second,for those who give feedbacks, increased abilities with prerequisite and systematic training are necessary.

Keywords

동료 피드백피드백 의견 유형수용도

References

  1. [1] [학술지(정기간행물)] 강숙희/협력학습을 적용한 글쓰기 사례 연구/국어교육학연구/2007/28(28)/183~208/국어교육학회/
  2. [2] [학위논문] 고은정/피드백 수용도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구/석사/전북대학교 대학원//2004
  3. [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김남미/대학 글쓰기수업에서의 동료평가 결과 연구/한민족문화연구/2009/(30)/151~180/한민족문화학회/
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김라연/웹 게시판을 이용한 감상문 쓰기에서의 동료 평가 양상 분석/청람어문교육/2007/(36)/207~233/청람어문교육학회/
  5. [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박상민/첨삭지도에 대한 학습자 요구분석과 효율적인 첨삭지도 방법/작문연구/2011/(13)/350~380/한국작문학회/
  6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] 서영진/작문 활동에서 동료 피드백 의견의 유형별 타당도 연구/국어교육학연구/2012/(44)/369~395/국어교육학회/
  7. [7] [학위논문] 안상영/동료평가 피드백 유형이 고등학생의 논술문 쓰기 능력과 태도에 미치는 효과/석사/한국교원대학교 교육대학원//2010
  8. [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] 염민호/대학 ‘글쓰기’ 교과에 활용 가능한 피드백의 특성과 방법/새국어교육/2009/(83)/311~336/한국국어교육학회/
  9. [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 오택환/협동 작문의 단계와 절차 탐색/국어교육학연구/2007/(29)/229~254/국어교육학회/
  10. [10] [학술지(정기간행물)] 오택환/논술문 쓰기에 나타난 동료 평가의 양상과 의의/새국어교육/2008/(80)/273~294/한국국어교육학회/
  11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] 오택환/인터넷 게시판 글쓰기에 나타난 동료평가의 양상과 유형/청람어문교육/2009/(40)/235~262/청람어문교육학회/
  12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이은자/교사 첨삭 피드백의 원리와 방법/작문연구/2009/(9)/123~152/한국작문학회/
  13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이재기/동료평가활동에서의 동료 반응이 교정에 미치는 영향/청람어문교육/1997/19/149~193/청람어문교육학회/
  14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] 정희모/대학생 글쓰기의 수정 방법에 관한 실험 연구 －자기첨삭, 동료첨삭, 교수첨삭의 효과를 중심으로－/국어교육학연구/2008/(33)/657~685/국어교육학회/
  15. [15] [단행본] 글쓰기 교육과 협력 학습/정희모/삼인/2006/~///
  16. [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김양희/The effectiveness of diverse types of written feedback: Comparative study of teacher and student feedback./영어어문교육/2010/16(4)/133~152/한국영어어문교육학회/
  17. [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] 주민재/대학 글쓰기 수정 교육에 관한 수업 모형 연구/작문연구/2008/(6)/281~318/한국작문학회/
  18. [18] [학위논문] 차인권/수행평가 피드백의 수용성에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구/석사/가톨릭대학교 대학원//2006
  19. [19] [학위논문] 최은진/EFL 교실 상호작용 : 교사의 피드백과 학습자 수용/석사/서울시립대학교 대학원//2010
  20. [20] [단행본] 사고와 표현/강은교/동아대학교출판부/2003/~///
  21. [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bannister, B./Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback : Interactive effects on recipient responses/Journal of Applied Psychology/1986/71(2)/203~210//
  22. [22] [학술지(정기간행물)] Brett, J. F/360 feedback : Accuracy, reactions, and perceptionsof usefulness/Journal of Applied Psychology Vol/2001/86(5)/930~942//
  23. [23] [단행본] Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, andthe Authority of Knowledge/Bruffee, K. A/Johns Hopkins University Press/1999/~///
  24. [24] [학술지(정기간행물)] Clifford, J./Composing in stages : The effects of a collaborative pedagogy/Research in the Teaching of English/1981/15(1)/37~53//
  25. [25] [학술지(정기간행물)] Connor, U./Peer response groups in ESL writing classes : Howmuch impact on revision?/Journal of Second Language Writing/1994/3(3)/257~276//
  26. [26] [학술지(정기간행물)] Ferris, D. R/Error feedback in L2 writing classe show explicitdoes it need to be?/Journal of Second Language Writing/2001/10/161~184//
  27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] Higgins, L./Planning text together : The role of criticalreflection in student collaboration/Journal of Educational Psychology/1992/71(5)/605~//
  28. [28] [학술지(정기간행물)] Holt, M./The Value of Written Peer Criticism/College Composition andCommunication/1992/43(3)/384~392//
  29. [29] [학술지(정기간행물)] Ilgen, D. R./Consequences of individual feedbackon behavior in organization/Journal of applied Psychology/1979/64(4)/349~371//
  30. [30] [학술지(정기간행물)] Leki, I./Preferences of ESL students for error correction in college level writingclasses/Foreign Language Annals/1991/24(3)/203~218//
  31. [31] [학술지(정기간행물)] Zhang, S./Re-examining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESLwriting class/Journal of Second Language Writing/1995/4(3)/209~222//

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved