Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

Exploring Latent Profiles of Writing Feedback Literacy among High School Students

Kim, Hyung-Sung

부산남일고등학교

Korea Business Review 60Vol. 2No. pp.71-106 (2025)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2025.60.2.71

Abstract

This study investigated writing feedback literacy among 562 Korean high-school students. A validated international scale was translated and adapted, then analysed with descriptive statistics, latent profile analysis, and multinomial logistic regression. Three profiles emerged—Passive Recipient, Preparation-oriented, and Practice-oriented. Gender and the frequency of giving and receiving feedback significantly increased the likelihood of belonging to the more advanced profiles. The results call for richer self- and peer-assessment opportunities, affective support when receiving critique, and thoughtful integration of AI-based feedback systems to move students toward active, practice-oriented engagement.

Keywords

글쓰기 피드백 리터러시피드백 리터러시글쓰기 피드백자동 피드백AWE생성형 AI

References

  1. [1] [보고서] 2022 개정 국어과 교육과정/교육부/교육부/2022/~/
  2. [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 공성수/대학 글쓰기 피드백 연구의 경향과 시사점/리터러시 연구/2022/13(3)/153~214//
  3. [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 곽수범/대학 글쓰기 피드백 체계 탐색/리터러시 연구/2021/12(3)/231~254//
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 권경문/AI 기반 한국어 글쓰기 자동 피드백의 질 평가 연구/청람어문교육/2025/104/205~244//
  5. [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김광희/중학생의 자기평가 수행 프로파일 분석: 피드백 리터러시, 학업적 자기효능감 및 성취도와의 관계/교육과정평가연구/2024/27(1)/245~268//
  6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김수정/동료 첨삭논평의 제공 양상 연구/인문연구/2022/(98)/171~206//
  7. [7] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김욱태/수학과 '확률과 통계' 영역에서 ChatGPT 를 활용한 서답형 평가 피드백이 학생들의 피드백 리터러시에 미치는 영향/컴퓨터교육학회 논문지/2024/27(3)/19~30//
  8. [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김정민/과정중심평가의 개념과 교육적 의의 탐색/학습자중심교과교육연구/2018/18(20)/839~859//
  9. [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김지연/글쓰기 수업에서 AI 기반 글쓰기 자동 피드백 프로그램 활용의 효과와 한계-독서와표현 교과에서 키위 (KEEwi) 활용 사례를 중심으로/영주어문/2024/58/355~386//
  10. [10] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김형성/국내외 글쓰기 피드백 연구 동향 분석과 과제/작문연구/2023/57/103~138//
  11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김혜연/교사의 작문 피드백 관련 국외 연구 동향 및 주요 쟁점: 네트워크 분석과 문헌고찰의 적용/국어교육연구/2016/37/95~136//
  12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] 나은미/동료 피드백을 활용한 소통과 협력을 위한 글쓰기 교육 방안 연구/리터러시연구/2020/11(6)/373~403//
  13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박민애/교사가 제공하는 피드백 유형과 교실 피드백 환경 조성이 초등학생의피드백 리터러시에 미치는 영향: 다층 잠재프로파일 분석의 적용/교사교육연구/2022/61(3)/293~310//
  14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박민애/학생용 피드백 리터러시 척도 (FLSS) 개발 및 타당화/교육평가연구/2019/32(3)/473~495//
  15. [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박준범/쓰기의 첨삭피드백 연구에 관한 비판적 재고찰/어문학/2017/138/85~125//
  16. [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] 반재천/교사별 과정 중심 평가에 대한 교사의 인식/교육과정평가연구/2018/21(3)/105~130//
  17. [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] 변경가/분석적 쓰기평가 범주별 피드백에 대한 학습자의 수용과 유용성 인식-전체 집단의 특성 및 쓰기 수준 집단 간 차이를 중심으로/국어교육/2022/178/33~66//
  18. [18] [학술지(정기간행물)] 신혜진/과정 중심 평가 활용의 정책적 분석-서울특별시 소재 중학교교사의 수행평가 활용 사례를 중심으로/교육과정평가연구/2017/20(2)/135~162//
  19. [19] [학술지(정기간행물)] 안상희/초등학생의 동료 논평이 고쳐 쓰기에 미치는 영향/새국어교육/2014/99/123~147//
  20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] 안효원/AI 코스웨어의 글쓰기 피드백에 대한 교사 인식 연구/새국어교육/2025//183~214//
  21. [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] 양경숙/중학생의 쓰기에 제시된 동료 피드백의 유형과 수용 양상 연구 중학교 2학년 학생을 대상으로/작문연구/2014/23/147~174//
  22. [22] [학술지(정기간행물)] 윤경훈/중학생의 동료 피드백과 글쓰기 수행의 관계-내용 생성하기 단계를 중심으로/리터러시 연구/2022/13(4)/77~116//
  23. [23] [학술지(정기간행물)] 윤경훈/중학생 동료 피드백의 수신과 발신이 글 수정에 미치는 영향-쓰기 효능감의 조절 효과를 중심으로/국어교육학연구/2024/59(2)/109~138//
  24. [24] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이지현/성취목표와 학업성취 및 수업참여의 관계에 미치는 피드백 리터러시의매개효과/한국초등교육/2021/32(2)/1~16//
  25. [25] [학술지(정기간행물)] 임지원/동료 피드백 제공 활동과 수용 활동이 논증적 글쓰기에 미치는 영향/국어교육/2022/179/101~130//
  26. [26] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장봉기/외국 검사도구의 번역 및 타당화 과정에 대한 비판적 검토-국어과 정의적 영역의 검사도구를 중심으로/국어교육학연구/2014/49(1)/558~584//
  27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] 최숙기/생성형 AI 기반 한국어 글쓰기 피드백의 질 평가 도구 개발 및 타당화 연구/청람어문교육/2025/103/227~263//
  28. [28] [학술지(정기간행물)] 최진영/생성형 AI 작문에 대한 고등학생의 인식 연구/작문연구/2025/64/43~91//
  29. [29] [학술지(정기간행물)] 한경숙/중학생의 쓰기에 제시된 동료 피드백의 유형과 수용 양상 연구-중학교 2학년학생을 대상으로/작문연구/2014/23/147~174//
  30. [30] [단행본] How feedback works: A playbook/Almarode J./Corwin Press/2022/~///
  31. [31] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bergman, L. R./A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology/Development and psychopathology/1997/9(2)/291~319//
  32. [32] [학술지(정기간행물)] Berndt M./Impact of sender and peer - feedback characteristics on performance, cognitive load, and mindful cognitive processing/Studies in Educational Evaluation/2022/75/101197~//
  33. [33] [학술지(정기간행물)] Carless D./The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback/Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education/2018/43(8)/1315~1325//
  34. [34] [학술지(정기간행물)] Chaktsiris, M. G./Thinking beyond Writing Development in Peer Review/Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning/2019/10(1)통권 : n1/~//
  35. [35] [학술지(정기간행물)] Cho K/Learning by reviewing/Journal of educational psychology/2011/103(1)/73~//
  36. [36] [학술지(정기간행물)] Chong, I./How students' ability levels influence the relevance and accuracy of their feedback to peers: A case study/Assessing Writing/2017/31/13~23//
  37. [37] [학술지(정기간행물)] Dowden T/Students' perceptions of written feedback in teacher education: Ideally feedback is a continuing two-way communication that encourages progress/Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education/2013/38(3)/349~362//
  38. [38] [학술지(정기간행물)] Escalante J./AI - generated feedback on writing: Insights into efficacy and ENL student preference/International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education/2023/20(1)/57~//
  39. [39] [단행본] The formative assessment action plan: Practical steps to more successful teaching and learning/Frey N./ASCD/2011/~///
  40. [40] [학술지(정기간행물)] Grewal R./The timing of repeat purchases of consumer durable goods: The role of functional bases of consumer attitudes/Journal of Marketing Research/2004/41(1)/101~115//
  41. [41] [학술지(정기간행물)] Guo K/To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT's potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing/Education and Information Technologies/2024/29(7)/8435~8463//
  42. [42] [학술지(정기간행물)] Han, Y./Student feedback literacy and engagement with feedback: A case study of Chinese undergraduate students/Teaching in Higher Education/2021/26(2)/181~196//
  43. [43] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hu, L. T./Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives/Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal/1999/6(1)/1~55//
  44. [44] [학술지(정기간행물)] Huisman B./Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students' peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance/Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education/2018/43(6)/955~968//
  45. [45] [학술지(정기간행물)] Jonsson, A./Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education/Active learning in higher education/2013/14(1)/63~76//
  46. [46] [학술지(정기간행물)] Li F/Student feedback literacy in L2 disciplinary writing: Insights from international graduate students at a UK university/Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education/2022/47(2)/198~212//
  47. [47] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lu, Q./Effects of writing feedback literacies on feedback engagement and writing performance: A cross - linguistic perspective/Assessing Writing/2024/62/100889~//
  48. [48] [학술지(정기간행물)] Magidson J./Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K -means/Canadian journal of marketing research/2002/20(1)/36~43//
  49. [49] [학술지(정기간행물)] Molloy, E./Developing a learning - centred framework for feedback literacy/Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education/2020/45(4)/527~540//
  50. [50] [단행본] The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences/Muthén, B.//2004/106~109///Latent variable analysis
  51. [51] [학술지(정기간행물)] Muthén B./Integrating person-centered and variable - centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes/Alcoholism: Clinical and experimental research/2000/24(6)/882~891//
  52. [52] [학술지(정기간행물)] Nieminen, J. H./Student agency in feedback: beyond the individual/Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education/2022/47(1)/95~108//
  53. [53] [단행본] Psychometric theory/Nunnally J./McGraw-Hill/1994/~///
  54. [54] [학술지(정기간행물)] Olson, M. W./The effects of written comments on the quality of student compositions and the learning of content/Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly/1987/8(4)/273~293//
  55. [55] [학술지(정기간행물)] Patchan, M. M./The nature of feedback: How peer feedback features affect students' implementation rate and quality of revisions/Journal of Educational Psychology/2016/108(8)/1098~//
  56. [56] [학술지(정기간행물)] Philippakos, Z. A./The effects of giving feedback on the persuasive writing of fourth -and fifth - grade students/Reading Research Quarterly/2016/51(4)/419~433//
  57. [57] [기타자료] Stahl M./Exploring LLM prompting strategies for joint essay scoring and feedback generation/arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15845/2024/2404.15845~//
  58. [58] [학술지(정기간행물)] Steiss J./Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students' writing/Learning and Instruction/2024/91/101894~//
  59. [59] [학술지(정기간행물)] Straub, R./The concept of control in teacher response: Defining the varieties of "directive" and "facilitative" commentary/College Composition & Communication/1996/47(2)/223~251//
  60. [60] [학술지(정기간행물)] Sutton, P./Conceptualizing feedback literacy: Knowing, being, and acting/Innovations in Education and Teaching International/2012/49(1)/31~40//
  61. [61] [학술지(정기간행물)] Taggart, A. R./Affect Matters: When Writing Feedback Leads to Negative Feeling/International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning/2017/11(2)/13~//
  62. [62] [학술지(정기간행물)] Winstone N. E./Discipline - specific feedback literacies: A framework for curriculum design/Higher Education/2022/83(1)/57~77//
  63. [63] [학술지(정기간행물)] Young, P./'I might as well give up': Self - esteem and mature students' feelings about feedback on assignments/Journal of Further and Higher education/2000/24(3)/409~418//
  64. [64] [학술지(정기간행물)] Yu, S./Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence - based framework/Assessing Writing/2021/48/100525~//
  65. [65] [학술지(정기간행물)] Yu, S./Assessing L2 student writing feedback literacy: A scale development and validation study/Assessing Writing/2022/53/100643~//
  66. [66] [학술지(정기간행물)] Zhan, Y./Developing and validating a student feedback literacy scale/Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education/2022/47(7)/1087~1100//
  67. [67] [학술지(정기간행물)] Zhang T/Exploring the development of student feedback literacy in the second language writing classroom/Assessing Writing/2023/55/100697~//
  68. [68] [학술지(정기간행물)] Zhu X/The relationships between the growth mindset, writing feedback literacy, and feedback engagement of undergraduate students in L1 Chinese writing learning/Studies in Educational Evaluation/2024/80/101320~//

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved