Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

A Study on the Direction of Debate Evaluation Based on Analysis of Debate Judging Paradigms

Lee sun young

한국교육과정평가원

Korea Business Review 44No. pp.453-481 (2012)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2012..44.453

Abstract

Debate evaluation is the essential part for the sustainable improvement of debate education. comparing to the importance of debate evaluation, domestic researches of this part are very few. so I intended to gain implications on the direction of debate evaluation through investigating of controversy on debate judging paradigms which are discussed in 'National Debate Tournament' and 'Cross Examination Debate Association'. I generalized controversy on debate judging paradigms focused on 'Stock issue paradigm', 'Policy making paradigm', 'Hypothesis-Testing paradigm', 'Tabula Rasa paradigm', 'Speaking skill paradigm.'. and I described each paradigm of distinction and analyzed each of merits and disadvantages. and I also discussed the elements of debate evaluation which are the subject of evaluation, the contents of evaluation, the method of evaluation, based on the results of analysis. From the direction of debate evaluation, it is suggested that In-depth discussion and Philosophical contemplation on the Essence of debate should be accomplished before developing a standard debate evaluation check-list. and I also proposed the concept of debate evaluation should be enlarged to support various kinds of debate activities.

Keywords

토론 평가토론 평가 패러다임필수 쟁점 패러다임정책 입안 패러다임가설 검증 패러다임백지 이론 패러다임말하기 기술 패러다임

References

  1. [1] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김채봉/반대 신문식 토론학습의 평가 방식 연구/한국초등국어교육/2003/(22)/227~276/한국초등국어교육학회/
  2. [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김평원/마이크로 토론(Micro Debate)을 활용한 CEDA 방식 토론 교육/국어교육학연구/2010/39(39)/281~312/국어교육학회/
  3. [3] [학술대회논문] 민병곤/표현교육론의 쟁점과 표현 영역의 중핵 성취기준/한국어교육학회 제269회 정기학술대회/2010//195~207/한국어교육학회
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 여미란/토론 평가형식의 문제점 분석과 새로운 평가형식: 1:1 토론형식을 중심으로/커뮤니케이션학 연구/2012/20(1)/87~115/한국커뮤니케이션학회/
  5. [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이도영/말하기 평가 목표와 평가 기준 설정 방안/교육논총/2010/30(2)/19~35//
  6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이두원/토론자의 디베이트 능력과 수행평가 모델 연구: 아카데미식 정책 디베이트를 중심으로/커뮤니케이션학 연구/2008/16(3)/83~103/한국커뮤니케이션학회/
  7. [7] [학위논문] 이민형/토론의 인용 전략 교육 연구/석사/서울대학교 대학원//2008
  8. [8] [학위논문] 이선영/토론 교육 내용 체계 연구 : 초·중·고 토론대회 담화 분석을 바탕으로/박사/서울대학교 대학원//2011
  9. [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이준응/공공 화법과 토론 교육이 의사소통 능력토론 효능감, 시민성에 미치는 효과/한국언론학보/2007/51(1)/144~171/한국언론학회/
  10. [10] [단행본] 교육토론의 모형과 의의, In 말하기 듣기 수업방법론/임칠성/박이정/2001/~///
  11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장혜영/아카데미 토론 평가에 대한 재고찰 - 토론승패와 설득은 일치하는가 -/수사학/2011/(14)/101~125/한국수사학회/
  12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] 전은주/상호관계적 말하기․듣기 교수․학습 방법을 이용한 토론 지도 프로그램의 교육효과/국어교육/2000/102/181~209/한국국어교육연구회/
  13. [13] [보고서] 초등학교 국어과 토론․토의 학습을 위한 교수․학습 모형 및 자료개발 연구/정재찬/교과교육연구소/1998/~/
  14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이창덕/새로운 화법교육 연구의 방향과 과제/국어교육/2007/(123)/53~92/한국어교육학회/
  15. [15] [단행본] 니코마코스 윤리학/Aristotle/서광사/2003/~///
  16. [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bartenen, M./Application of the issues-agenda paradigm to speaker duties in value debate/Contemporary Argumentation and Debate/1987/8/42~51//
  17. [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] Berube, M. D./Whatever happened to “value debate?”/Contemporary Argumentation & Debate/2002/23/85~90//
  18. [18] [학술지(정기간행물)] Cirlin, Alan/metaparadigm for judging CEDA debate：on viewing the judge as an assessor/Contemporary Argumentation and Debate/1985/6/50~56//
  19. [19] [단행본] 사고하는 방법/Dewey, John/법문사/1981/~///
  20. [20] [학술대회논문] Dudczak,C/The element of CEDA Debate Paradigms：An investigation of Paradigm Accuracy/ECA Conference/1992//1~15/
  21. [21] [학술대회논문] Dudczak, C/The Impact of Paradigm Consistency on Taxanomic Boundaries in CEDA Debate/Speech Communication Association 76th, Chicago/1990//1~41/
  22. [22] [학술지(정기간행물)] Fisher, W. R./Clarifying the Narrative Paradigm/Communication Monographs/1989/56/55~58//
  23. [23] [기타자료] Freeley, A. J./Judging Paradigms：The Impact of the Critic on Argument//1981/433~447//
  24. [24] [단행본] Arguments and Arguing：The Products and Process of Human Decision Making/Hollihan, T. A/St. Martin's Press, Inc/2004/~///
  25. [25] [단행본] Status in Deliberative Analysis, In The Rhetorical Idiom/Hultzen, L. S./Cornell University Press/1958/97~123///
  26. [26] [학술지(정기간행물)] Jones, M.A/Justification of values in terms of action：rationale for a modified policy-making paradigm in value debate/Contemporary Argumentation and Debate/1984/5/11~15//
  27. [27] [단행본] The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago and London：Univ. of Chicago Press, In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions/Kuhn, Thomas S./Univ. of Chicago Press/1996/12~14///
  28. [28] [단행본] Contemporary Debate/Patterson, J/Houghton-Mifflin/1983/~///
  29. [29] [단행본] The new rhetoric：a treatise on argumentation/Perellman,C/University of Nortre Dame/1969/~///
  30. [30] [학술대회논문] Rowland, R./Substance or Procedure：Misapplication of the ‘Tabula Rasa’ approach/Speech Communication Association 67th, Anaheim/1981//1~18/
  31. [31] [단행본] 담화 속의 논증/Ruth Amossy/동문선/2003/~///
  32. [32] [학술지(정기간행물)] Strait, P. L./Academic debate as a decision-making game/Contemporary Argumentation and debate/2008/29/1~36//
  33. [33] [학술지(정기간행물)] Thomas, D./Extending the Boundaries of Debate Theory：A Value-Bounded Policy Decision Making Paradigm/Speech Communication Association 70th, Chicago/1984//1~44//
  34. [34] [학술지(정기간행물)] Ulrich, Walter/Debate as Dialectic：A Defence of Tabula Rasa Approach to Judging/Journal of the American Forensic Association/1984/21/89~93//
  35. [35] [단행본] 논증의 탄생：글쓰기의 새로운 전략/Williams, Joseph M/홍문관/2008/~///

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved