The Grammaticalization Phenomenon and Syntactic & Pragmatic Meaning of Usual Form ‘-(으)ㄴ 결과/끝에/나머지’
Guo Yicheng
복단대학
Korea Business Review 52Vol. 1No. pp.215-245 (2017)
Abstract
‘결과(result)’, ‘끝(end)’, ‘나머지(the rest)’ can be used as an independent noun in sentences. Meanwhile, they also can be used as an usual form ‘-(으)ㄴ 결과’, ‘-(으)ㄴ 끝에’, ‘-(으)ㄴ 나머지’ in sentences acting a grammatical function to connect two clauses. Although they haven’t become grammatical morphemes, but their meaning become abstract and they have fixed grammatical morphology when they are used as an usual form. Therefore they can be regarded as an incomplete grammaticalization phenomenon ‘word>compound usual form’. In this paper, we come to the conclusion that ‘-(으)ㄴ 나머지’ is more grammaticalized than ‘-(으)ㄴ 결과’ and ‘-(으)ㄴ 끝에’ in sequence by concerning their meaning abstraction, morphological reanalysis and decategorialization. We also revealed the difference of their syntactic and pragmatic meaning based on corpus data statistics. ‘-(으)ㄴ 결과’ is usually used with the verbs like ‘분석하다(analyze), 조사하다(investigate), 실험하다 (test)’ and the later half of the sentence always express a certain objective fact is revealed. ‘-(으)ㄴ 끝에’ is always used with the verbs which may last for a long time or repeat several times such like ‘벌이다(start), 생각하다 (think), 기다리다(wait)’, and the later half of the sentence usually express some goal or mission was achieved. ‘-(으)ㄴ 나머지’ is used with the verbs or adjectives which express emotion or feeling such like ‘답답하다(stuffy), 당황하다(embarrassed), 기쁘다(happy)’, to express that something was done because the emotion was too strong. Consequently, we can make a conclusion that usual form ‘-(으)ㄴ 결과’ expresses [cause-and-effect relationship][emphasis on which subjective fact was revealed], ‘-(으)ㄴ 끝에’ expresses [order of time][emphasis on a lot of time and effort was spent], ‘-(으)ㄴ 결과’ expresses [cause-and-effect relationship][emphasis on which emotion is too strong].
Keywords
-(으)ㄴ 결과-(으)ㄴ 끝에-(으)ㄴ 나머지문법화 정도통사적 의미화용적 의미
References
- [1] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김민국/‘말이다’ 구성의 문법화와 화용화/國語學/2011/(62)/73~106/국어학회/
- [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 남미정/국어의 문법화에 대한 재고/한국어학/2010/49/209~233/한국어학회/
- [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박승윤/국어 수혜격 구문의 문법화/담화와 인지/2003/10(1)/105~120/담화·인지언어학회/
- [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 백낙천/국어의 문법화 현상에 대하여/한국언어문화/2009/(39)/241~257/한국언어문화학회/
- [5] [단행본] 한국문화사대계 5: 한국어 발달사-문법사/안병희/고대민족문화연구소/1967/~///
- [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] 안주호/연결어미 ‘-기에/-길래’의 특성과 형성 과정/담화와인지/1999/6(1)/101~120/담화인지언어학회/
- [7] [학술지(정기간행물)] 안주호/-는 법이다'류의 양태표현 연구/國語學/2004/(44)/185~210/국어학회/
- [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] 안주호/현대국어 ‘싶다’ 구문의 문법적 특징과 형성과정/한국어 의미학/2006/20/371~391/한국어의미학회/
- [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 안주호/현대국어 연결어미 {-니까}의 문법적 특성과 형성과정/언어과학연구/2006/(38)/71~91/언어과학회/
- [10] [학술지(정기간행물)] 안주호/{-치고}의 문법적 특성에 대한 고찰/한글/2010/(288)/43~72/한글학회/
- [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] 안주호/현대국어 {-고}계열 조사의 문법화 연구/한국어 의미학/2011/34/213~234/한국어의미학회/
- [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] 양주동/향가주석산고/진단학보/1939/10/110~133/진단학회/
- [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] 유창돈/허사화 고구/인문과학/1962/7/1~23/연세대학교 인문과학연구소/
- [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이금희/依存名詞의 文法化 程度와 樣態的인 意味 -‘-기 마련이다, -는 법이다, -기 십상이다, -기 일쑤이다’를 중심으로-/어문연구(語文硏究)/2012/40(3)/57~89/한국어문교육연구회/
- [15] [단행본] 국어사개설/이기문/민중서관/1961/~///
- [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이성하/문법화론과 한국언어학/언어과학연구/1999/16/427~458/언어과학회/
- [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이수련/‘있다’의 문법화에 대한 의미·화용적 연구/國語學/2003/42/177~205/국어학회/
- [18] [단행본] 중세국어문법/이숭녕/을유문화사/1961/~///
- [19] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이지양/문법화의 이론과 국어의 문법화/정신문화연구/2003/26(3)/211~239/한국학중앙연구원/
- [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] 최형용/문법화의 한 양상에 대하여/관악어문연구/1998/22/469~489/서울대학교 국어국문학과/
- [21] [단행본] Morphology : a study of the relation between meaning and form/Bybee, J./John Benjamins/1985/~///
- [22] [단행본] The Evolution of Grammar/Bybee, J./The University of Chicago Press/1994/~///
- [23] [단행본] Grammaticalization : A Conceptual Framework/Heine, B./The University of Chicago Press/1991/~///
- [24] [단행본] Grammaticalization/Hopper, P./Cambridge University Press/1993/~///
