Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

The Study for Debate Strategies of the Negative Team in Policy Proposition Debate

Min Hyoung Lee

서일중학교

Korea Business Review 52Vol. 1No. pp.397-442 (2017)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2017.52.1.397

Abstract

This study recognizes the lack of domestic studies that focus on the role of the opposition team and understand its strategies from a broader perspective. It aims to provide a macroscopic perspective of the negative team that is essential to prepare and manage a debate on policy proposition. In particular, the study examined the different aspects of the first negative constructive in high school debates, and obtained results by learning the relevant strategies. The analysis shows that the oppositions use various strategies. However, they lacked effective reasoning and justification, and was not strategically presented because they can’t focuse the affirmative case and form the L-R-I structure.

Keywords

국어교육토론교육반대 측입론입증 책임추정절차적 논증실질적 논증현재 상 태L-R-I 구조

References

  1. [1] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김주환/대학생 토론 담화의 반박 전략 분석/화법연구/2016/(31)/45~72/한국화법학회/
  2. [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김주환/대학생 토론 담화의 입론 구성 연구/화법연구/2016/(34)/31~64/한국화법학회/
  3. [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박재현/중등학교 국어 교과서 토론 단원에 제시된 정책 논제의 적합성 분석/새국어교육/2013/(96)/139~165/한국국어교육학회/
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박재현/정책 토론의 입론 구성 교육 내용 연구/우리말글/2014/60/93~121/우리말글학회/
  5. [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박재현/초·중·고 학생의 정책 토론 입론 양상 분석 -피해와 내재성 쟁점을 중심으로-/화법연구/2014/(25)/159~187/한국화법학회/10.18625/jsc.2014..25.159
  6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] 여미란/토론 평가형식의 문제점 분석과 새로운 평가형식: 1:1 토론형식을 중심으로/커뮤니케이션학 연구/2012/20(1)/87~115/한국커뮤니케이션학회/
  7. [7] [학술지(정기간행물)] 육영주/토론 유형에 따른 반박 전략/한국언어문화/2013/(50)/165~187/한국언어문화학회/
  8. [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이민형/가치 논제 토론의 입론 형식 유형 연구 - 필수 쟁점의 논리 구조를 중심으로/국어교육학연구/2015/50(3)/121~160/국어교육학회/
  9. [9] [학위논문] 이민형/가치 논제 토론 수업을 위한 설계 기반 연구/박사/서울대학교//2016
  10. [10] [학술지(정기간행물)] 최지원/아카데미식 토론의 입론 전개 방식에 따른 설득효과: 설득 지식 모델을 중심으로/한국소통학보/2015/(28)/79~113/한국소통학회/
  11. [11] [단행본] 디베이트 가이드/Ericson, J/길벗/2013/~///
  12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bartanen, M./Application of the issues agenda paradaigm to speaker duties in value debates/Contemporary Argumentation & Debate/1987/8/42~51//
  13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] Berube, D./A Radical Complaint/Contemporary Argumentation & Debate/2002/23/85~90//
  14. [14] [단행본] Argumentation and Debate: critical thinking for reasoned decision making/Freeley, A./Wadsworth/2013/~///
  15. [15] [단행본] Arguments and Arguing/Hollihan, T./Waveland Press, Inc/2005/~///
  16. [16] [단행본] The Art and Practice of Argumentation and Debate, Mountain View/Hill, B./Mayfield Publishing Company/1997/~///
  17. [17] [단행본] Strategic Debate/Wood, R./McGraw-Hill/2006/~///
  18. [18] [단행본] Prima facie: a guide to value debate/Wood, S./Kendall Hunt Pub Co/1989/~///
  19. [19] [단행본] Argumentation: InQuiry & Advocacy/Ziegelmueller, G./Allyn & Bacon/1997/~///

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved