Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

An Analysis of the 2018 National Assessment of the Korean Writing Ability of Adults

Jang Ji-hye SEO BOYOUNG Kim, Jong-Cheol

서울대학교 서울대학교 서울대학교

Korea Business Review 55Vol. 1No. pp.155-204 (2020)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2020.55.1.155

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze and discuss the results of the 2018 assessment of Korean language ability of adults, focusing on writing ability. This survey was conducted with 3,000 adult men and women aged 20 to 69. The results showed that the average writing score was 121.61 in 2018, about one point higher than in 2013. This performance is generally very poor. In the 2018 survey, the cut-off score of the 2013 study was applied, but the score of the division was newly formulated through the equalization of the survey tools, and each grade was classified into levels 4, 3, 2, and 1. In addition, except for the variables newly introduced in 2018, the change in the participants’ language ability was confirmed based on the variables set in 2013, namely sex, age, regional scale, education, and occupation. In 2018, the ratio of level 1 increased(+9.4%p), so the order of ratio of levels 2, 1, 3, and 4, compared to the ratio of levels 2, 3, 1, and 4 in writing in 2013. The overall average was similar to that of 2013 but the ratios of levels 3, 4 increased slightly, and 1 increased greatly, indicating that there was a slight variation in the writing ability of the Korean adults. When the participants were grouped by variable and ranked according to their writing skills, the scores of participants in their 20s, 30s, were higher than the scores of participants in their 40s and 50s. In terms of region size, the scores of participants in the urban areas were higher than the scores of participants in rural areas. The ranking by occupation showed that the scores of mental workers were higher than the scores of manual workers. Then, the ranking by education showed that university graduates had higher scores than high school graduates and middle school graduates. However, there was no difference between the scores of men and those of women. Based on the findings, we propose the following. First, to improve writing ability among the general public, practical educational programs should be developed. Second, social participation through writing should be encouraged at the national level and people should be encouraged to use their writing skills throughout their lifetime. Third, a large-scale writing assessment environment should be created to improve the validity, reliability, and authenticity of the evaluation. Finally, the subject variables should be closely analyzed to inform policy-making.

Keywords

쓰기 능력쓰기 평가쓰기 수준쓰기 교육국어 능력국어 능력 평가국가수준 국어 능력 평가

References

  1. [1] [학위논문] 가은아/쓰기 발달의 양상과 특성 연구/박사/한국교원대학교 대학원/국어교육/2011
  2. [2] [보고서] 2017 인터넷 이용 실태조사 요약 보고서/주용완/과학기술정보통신부, 한국인터넷진흥원/2018/~/
  3. [3] [단행본] 간추린 교육통계/교육부/교육부/2018/~///
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 권태현/쓰기 채점 방식에 따른 국어교사의 채점 신뢰도 비교 연구 -고등학생의 비평문 채점을 중심으로-/교원교육/2012/28(3)/113~134/교육연구원/http://dx.doi.org/
  5. [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김라연/총체적 쓰기 평가와 분석적 쓰기 평가의 상관 연구/이중언어학/2007/(35)/103~126/이중언어학회/10.17296/korbil.2007..35.103
  6. [6] [학위논문] 김성숙/학문 목적 기초 한국어 쓰기 능력 평가 척도 개발과 타당성 검증/박사/연세대학교 대학원/국어국문학/2011
  7. [7] [학위논문] 金正子/쓰기 評價 方法 연구 : 評價基準의 設定과 그 適用을 중심으로/석사/서울大學校 大學院/국어교육학/1992
  8. [8] [단행본] 2013년 국민의 국어 능력 평가/김종철/국립국어원/2013/~///
  9. [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 남민우/국어과 학업성취도 평가 도구의 국제 비교 연구/국어교육연구/2011/(49)/1~36/국어교육학회(since1969)/10.17247/jklle.2011..49.1
  10. [10] [학술지(정기간행물)] 노창수/글짓기 영역의 기능평가론/국어교육/1987/61/37~64//
  11. [11] [보고서] 2018년 국민의 국어 능력 실태 조사/민병곤/국립국어원/2018/~/
  12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영목/작문 능력 평가 방법과 절차/국어교육/1999/99/1~29//
  13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영민/국가 수준 학업성취도 평가 개선을 위한 ‘쓰기’ 평가 이론의 정립/국어교육/2011/(134)/87~112/한국어교육학회/
  14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영민/인문계 고등학생의 쓰기 지식과 쓰기 수행의 상관 및 성별·학년별 차이 연구/국어교육/2009/(128)/175~202/한국어교육학회/
  15. [15] [학위논문] 서수현/요인 분석을 통한 쓰기 평가의 준거 설정에 대한 연구/박사/고려대학교 대학원/국어교육/2008
  16. [16] [단행본] 문항 제작 및 분석의 이론과 실제/성태제/학지사/1998/~///
  17. [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이수진/쓰기 직접 평가를 위한 텍스트 분석 평가의 실행 방안/작문연구/2011/(13)/142~166/한국작문학회/
  18. [18] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장성민/대학수학능력시험 “국어” 작문 영역 평가의 타당성 검토 - 선다형 점수와 수행형 점수의 상관관계를 중심으로 -/작문연구/2016/(29)/163~209/한국작문학회/
  19. [19] [학술지(정기간행물)] 정희모/대학생 글에 대한 총체적 평가와 분석적 평가의 결과 비교 연구/청람어문교육/2009/(39)/251~273/청람어문교육학회/10.26589/jockle..39.200906.251
  20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] 지은림/사회과 보고서 수행평가를 위한 총체적 채점과 분석적 채점의 비교/교육평가연구/1999/12(2)/11~24//
  21. [21] [단행본] 국어 교육의 이해: 국어 교육의 미래를 모색하는 열여섯 가지 이야기/최미숙/사회평론/2017/~///
  22. [22] [단행본] 교육평가용어사전/한국교육평가학회/학지사/2004/~///
  23. [23] [보고서] 한국인의 역량, 학습과 일: 국제성인역량조사(PIAAAC) 보고서/한국직업능력개발원/한국직업능력개발원/2013/~/
  24. [24] [단행본] 장르 : 역사·이론·연구·교육/Bawarshi, A. S./경진출판/2015/~///
  25. [25] [단행본] Cognitive Process in Writing/Bereiter, C./LEA/1980/~///Development in writing
  26. [26] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hout, B./The Literature of direct writing assessment: Major concerns and prevailing trends/Review of Educational Research/1990/60(2)/237~263//
  27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] Purves, A. C./In search of an internationally valid scheme for scoring compositions/College composition and communication/1984/35(4)/426~438//
  28. [28] [단행본] Assessing Writing/Weigle, S. C./Cambridge University Press/2002/~///
  29. [29] [단행본] An Overview of Writing Assessment/Wolcott, W./NCTE/1998/~///
  30. [30] [학술지(정기간행물)] Yancey, K. B./Looking back as we look forward : Historicizing writing assessment/College Composition and Communication/1999/50(3)/483~503//

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved