Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

Aspects of Peer Responses and Their Reactions in College Writing Composition

Seo Su Hyun

광주교육대학교

Korea Business Review 41No. pp.447-472 (2011)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2011..41.447

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate what kind of responses college student writers would have to the reports of their peers and how they would react the peer responses to their reports. For that purpose, the researcher obtained primary data from the reports of 78 college students, who were asked to read the peer responses to their reports and think over whether they would accept them or not. Peer responses were categorized into appropriateness of topics, feasibility of arguments and reasons, appropriateness of expression and systematic structure and consideration of readers. As a result, the college students made diverse responses to the reports of their peer writers and usually focused on the feasibility of arguments and reasons, and systematic structure. Then the aspects of the ways they reacted responses were analyzed. The analysis results show that they usually accepted peer responses but sometimes would reserve their decision or reject them. Those responses indicate that the content pointed out in the peer responses is not always reflected in the report. Since the study focused on peer responses to writing works themselves, follow-up study needs to investigate peer responses including various interactions for more active research discussions in the field.

Keywords

대학생 필자동료 반응동료 반응에 대한 수용 양상

References

  1. [1] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김정자/학생의 글에 반응하는 것에 대한 교사의 경험 및 인식 조사/국어교육학연구/2010/(38)/99~125/국어교육학회/
  2. [2] [학위논문] 서수현/요인 분석을 통한 쓰기 평가의 준거 설정에 대한 연구/박사/고려대학교//2008
  3. [3] [단행본] 학습자 중심의 국어교육/신헌재/서광학술자료사/1994/~///
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 오택환/자기소개서 쓰기 활동에서 동료 상호 평가의 양상 연구/국어교육연구/2008/(43)/137~158/국어교육학회(since1969)/
  5. [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이수진/쓰기 교수-학습에서 조언자로서 교사의 의미 탐색/청람어문교육/2007/(36)/301~328/청람어문교육학회/
  6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이재기/쓰기 교육에서의 학생 필자의 자리/청람어문교육/2006/(33)/51~80/청람어문교육학회/
  7. [7] [학술지(정기간행물)] 정혜승/중등학생 필자의 독자 인식 양상/청람어문교육/2009/(39)/213~250/청람어문교육학회/
  8. [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] 정희모/대학생 글쓰기의 수정 방법에 관한 실험 연구 －자기첨삭, 동료첨삭, 교수첨삭의 효과를 중심으로－/국어교육학연구/2008/(33)/657~685/국어교육학회/
  9. [9] [단행본] 과정 중심 작문 평가/한철우/원미사/2003/~///
  10. [10] [단행본] Writing and Response-Theory, Practice, and Research/Anson, C. M/NCTE/1989/~///
  11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bardine, B. A/Beyond the Red Pen：Clarifying Our Role in the Response Process/English Journal/2000/90(1)/94~101//
  12. [12] [단행본] The psychology of written composition/Bereiter, C./Erlbaum/1987/~///
  13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] Berg, E. C/The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality/Journal of Second Language Writing/1999/8/215~241//
  14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] Brannon, L./On Students' Rights to Their Own Texts：A Model of Teacher Response/College Composition and Communication/1982/33/157~166//
  15. [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] Cho, K./Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline：A web-based reciprocal peer review system/Computers and Education/2007/48(3)/409~426//
  16. [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] Cho, K/Validity and Reliability of Scaffolded Peer Assessment of Writing from Instructor and Student Perspectives/Journal of Educational Psychology/2006/98(4)/891~901//
  17. [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] DiGiovanni, E/Online peer review：An alternative to face-to face/ELT Journal/2001/55(3)/263~272//
  18. [18] [학술지(정기간행물)] DiPardo, A./Peer Response Groups in the Writing Classroom：Theoretic Foundations and New Directions/Review of Educational Research/1988/58(2)/119~149//
  19. [19] [학술지(정기간행물)] Dossin, M. M/Among friends：Effective peer critiquing/The Clearing House/2003/76(4)/206~207//
  20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] Falchikov, N/Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education：A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks/Review of Educational Research/2000/70(3)/287~322//
  21. [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] Falchikov, N/Peer feedback marking：developing peer assessment/Innovations in Education and Training International/1995/32(2)/~//
  22. [22] [학술지(정기간행물)] Haaga, D. A. F/Peer review of term papers in graduate psychology courses/Teaching of Psychology/1993/20/28~32//
  23. [23] [학술지(정기간행물)] Haswell, R. H/NCTE/CCCC's recent war on scholarship/Written Communication/2005/22(2)/198~223//
  24. [24] [단행본] Research on written composition/Hillocks, G/National Council of Teachers of English/1986/~///
  25. [25] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hu,G/Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers/Language Teaching Research/2005/9(3)/321~342//
  26. [26] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kent,R/Revision：Different editors for different drafts/The NERA Journal/2004/40(1)/47~51//
  27. [27] [단행본] Handbook of writing research/MacArthur, C. A./The Guilford Press/2006/~///
  28. [28] [학술지(정기간행물)] Marcellus,J/Peer revision groups in journalism classes/Feminist Media Studies/2001/1(3)/385~386//
  29. [29] [학술지(정기간행물)] Marcoulides, G. A./Evaluating student papers：The case for peer review/Journal of Education for Business/1991/67(2)/80~83//
  30. [30] [학술지(정기간행물)] Marcoulides, G. A/The consistency of peer review in student writing projects/Journal of Education for Business/1995/70/220~223//
  31. [31] [학술지(정기간행물)] Matsumura, S/Computer anxiety and students’ preferred feedback methods in EFL writing/The Modern Language Journal/2004/88(3)/403~415//
  32. [32] [학술지(정기간행물)] Paulus, T. M./The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing/Journal of Second Language Writing/1999/8/265~289//
  33. [33] [단행본] Peer evaluation is effective in writing course/Pitts, B/Educator/1988/84~88///
  34. [34] [학술지(정기간행물)] Shaw,V.N/Peer review as a motivating device in the training of writing skills for college students/Journal of College Reading and Learning/2002/33(1)/68~76//
  35. [35] [학술지(정기간행물)] Simmons, J./Responders are taught, not born/Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy/2003/46(8)/684~693//
  36. [36] [학술지(정기간행물)] Stern, L. A/Effective faculty feedback：The road less traveled/Assessing Writing/2006/11/22~41//
  37. [37] [학술지(정기간행물)] Straub, R./The Concept of Control in Teacher Response：Defining the Varieties of “Directive” and “Facilitative” Commentary/College Composition and Communication/1996/47(2)/223~251//
  38. [38] [학술지(정기간행물)] Straub, R/The Student, the text, and the classroom context：A Case study of teacher response/Assessing Writing/2000/7/23~55//
  39. [39] [단행본] Key Works on Teacher Response/Straub, R/Boynton/Cook Heinemann/2006/~///
  40. [40] [단행본] Twelve Readers Reading Responding to Colege Student Writing/Straub, R/Hampton Press/1995/~///
  41. [41] [학술지(정기간행물)] Sullivan, D./Computer-mediated peer review of student papers/Journal of Education for Business/1998/74(2)/117~121//
  42. [42] [학술지(정기간행물)] Tsui, A. B. M/Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments/Journal of Second Language Writing/2000/9/147~170//
  43. [43] [학술지(정기간행물)] Yagelski, R/The role of classroom context in the revision strategies of student writers/Research in the Teaching of English/1995/29/216~338//

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved