Categories of Argumentation Schemes as Strategy of Argumentative Communication -based on a critical review of ‘argument’ education content in the Korean text books-
Seo Yeong-jin
부산대학교
Korea Business Review 41No. pp.473-504 (2011)
Abstract
This study, recognizing value and importance of argumentation schemes, critically contemplates contents related to ‘argument’ and ‘argumentation scheme’ of the 2007 revised Korean curriculum for the second year middle school Korean textbooks and related theoretical discussions. The final aim is to modify classification standard of argumentation schemes and select more valuable ones. Having selected argumentation schemes, a groundwork will be provided to materialize teaching-learning contents. Argumentation schemes are generally divided by message, participant and context in argumentative communication situations. Schemes based on message are subdivided into deduction, induction, analogy, cause and effect and presumption schemes in consideration of interior premise and logical relations in conclusion. Participant schemes appeal to commentators in connection with positive or negative feeling of expectation on future consequence. Context schemes are based on sociocultural environment context dictating argumentative situations and a typical example is authority scheme.
Keywords
논증적 상호 교섭논증 도식분류 체계
References
- [1] [학위논문] 김인애/논증 도식 지도를 통한 논술 교수․학습 방안 연구/석사/이화여대//2007
- [2] [단행본] 비판적 사고를 위한 논리/김희정/아카넷/2008/~///
- [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 민병곤/논증 이론의 현황과 국어 교육의 과제/국어교육학연구/2001/12/237~285/국어교육학회/
- [4] [학위논문] 민병곤/논증 교육의 내용 연구:6, 8, 10학년 학습자의 작문 및 토론 분석을 바탕으로/박사/서울대학교//2004
- [5] [단행본] 토론과 논증/박승억/형성출판사/2005/~///
- [6] [단행본] 논리와 논증의 이해/박준호/한국문화사/2003/~///
- [7] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박준호/논증의 종류와 평가의 기준 -비판적 사고와 비형식 논리학의 의의/범한철학/2006/42(3)/273~296/범한철학회/
- [8] [단행본] 리더를 위한 논리 훈련/송하석/사피엔스/2010/~///
- [9] [단행본] 논증과 글쓰기/이광모/형설출판사/2006/~///
- [10] [단행본] 논증의 정석/이명숙/(주)공공&상상/2011/~///
- [11] [단행본] 논증이론과 논증분석, 한국텍스트과학의 제 과제/이성만/역락/2001/~///
- [12] [단행본] 생활 속의 논리 논증과 논쟁/이정일/이담/2010/~///
- [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장인봉/오늘날 서구의 논증 연구/수사학/2006/23(4)/239~268/한국수사학회/
- [14] [학위논문] 진영란/6학년 논증 텍스트에 나타난 논증 도식 양상 연구/석사/한국교원대//2005
- [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] 최승기/논증 평가 기법 개발/수사학/2008/17(9)/173~198/한국수사학회/
- [16] [단행본] 비판적 사고와 논리/한상기/서광사/2007/~///
- [17] [학위논문] 황정아/논증 도식을 활용한 논술 교육 방안/석사/한국외대//2009
- [18] [단행본] 논증의 역사/장혜영/커뮤니케이션북스/2006/~///
- [19] [단행본] 페럴만의 신수사학-새로운 세기의 철학과 방법론/Maneli, Mieczyslaw/고려대학교 출판부/2006/~///
- [20] [단행본] 논변의 사용/고현범/고려대학교출판부/2006/~///
- [21] [단행본] 논리의 숲 논술의 꽃/Walton, D./베가북스/2008/~///
- [22] [단행본] 논리학/Wesley, C. Salmon/박영사/2010/~///
- [23] [단행본] 논증의 탄생/Williams, J/홍문관/2008/~///
- [24] [단행본] Argumentation Schemes/Douglas W./Cambridge Press/2010/~///
- [25] [단행본] Critical thinking and communication/Edward, S. I/Allyn and Vacon/2010/~///
- [26] [단행본] Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory:A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Development/Eemern. F/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc/1996/~///
- [27] [단행본] Argumentation and debate:Critical thinking for reasoned decision making(11th ed.)/Freeley A.J/Wadsworth Publishing company/2005/~///
- [28] [기타자료] Govier, Trudy/Ways of Teaching Reasoning Directly, The Frist British Conference on Informal Logic and Critical Thinking//1988/~//
- [29] [단행본] The Philosophy of argument/Govier, Trudy/Vale Press/2001/~///
- [30] [기타자료] Kienpointer,M/How to Classify Arguments/Emeren et al/1992/~//
- [31] [단행본] The New Rhetoric:A Tratise on Argumentation/Perelman. C/University of Norte Dama Press/1969/~///
- [32] [학술대회논문] Rigotti, Eddo/Can classical topics be revives within the contemporary Thoery of argumentation/the ISSA Conference on Argumentation Theory/2006//~/
- [33] [단행본] Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning/Walton, D. N/LEA/1996/~///
- [34] [단행본] Argumentation Schemes/Walton, D. N/Cambridge University Press/2010/~///
- [35] [단행본] Perspective on Argument/Wood Nancy V/Prentice Hall/2001/~///
- [36] [단행본] Argument:Critical Thinking, Logic and th Fallacies/Wood, J./Prentice Hall/2000/~///
