Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

The Necessity and Possibility of the Hierarchy of Korean Classic Literature

Kim, Seong-ryong

호서대학교

Korea Business Review 47No. pp.5-41 (2013)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2013..47.5

Abstract

This study considers that the crisis of Korean classic literary education is due to the failure of the social agreement in teaching Korean classic literary works at the secondary education. Specifically, the reason for the agreement failure of the ratio and the arrangement of the classic literary works is caused not by following the educational engineering plan but solely by the aesthetical purpose. To resolve this problem the specialists in the field of classic literary education need to first present the hierarchy of Korean classic literary works. Then the classic literary education should follow the presented hierarchy accordingly. However, until recently, there were few discussions about the hierarchy of Korean classic literary works. Moreover, the bases for the hierarchy were difficult to establish. Thus, in the current study, two national examinations were surveyed. The careful observation and analyses of the two exams provided an inference that although never clearly written in paper and ink, there exists a consensus of the hierarchy in Korean class literary works amongst the specialists of the field. The key factors that compose the educational hierarchy are the text reading comprehension variable and the problem solving variable. Due to the interaction between the readers’ cognitive process and the texts’ absolute difficulty, text complexity will occur during text reading comprehension. During the problem solving, task complexity will occur because of the interaction between the required contents of the task and the readers’ cognitive development process. For the text reading comprehension variable, several research on the text readability in the U.S. are examined. Especially, as the 2010 Common Core State Standards(CCSS) are accomplished and executed in the U.S., text complexity can be approached quantitatively, qualitatively and task-based. The CCSS offers considerable insightful suggestions to the Korean classic literary education. As for the problem solving variable, the main concern is what needs to be learned from Korean classic literary works. This relates to the revised version of Bloom’s education taxonomy. According to the revised Bloom’s education taxonomy, the contents of the classic literary education can be divided into school education and school-age. At present, the two methodologies – CCSS for text complexity and Bloom’s education taxonomy for task complexity – will provide for the necessary hierarchy of the Korean classic literary education. The reasonableness and the usefulness of the established hierarchy will be explored in the future research.

Keywords

고전 문학 교육위계텍스트 가독성텍스트 복잡도과제 곤란도교육목표분류

References

  1. [1] [인터넷자원] 한국교육과정평가원/www.kice.re.kr////
  2. [2] [인터넷자원] Common Core State Standards Initiative/www.corestandards.org////
  3. [3] [인터넷자원] Readability Formula/www.readabilityformulas.com////
  4. [4] [학위논문] 고영화/시조 교육의 위계화 연구/박사/서울대학교 대학원/국어교육/2007
  5. [5] [보고서] 2010년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과 분석 - 국어/김도남/한국교육과정평가원/2011/~/한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRE 2011-3-2
  6. [6] [보고서] 2011년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과 분석 - 국어/김도남/한국교육과정평가원/2012/~/한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRE-2012-2-2
  7. [7] [보고서] 2012년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과 분석 - 국어/김도남/한국교육과정평가원/2013/~/한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 ORM 2013-37-1
  8. [8] [학술대회논문] 김성룡/교육과정: 문학교육의 위계화/국어교육학회 제53회 학술발표요지/2013//~/국어교육학회
  9. [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김영란/국어과 국가수준 학업성취도 평가의 문항 개선 방안 연구 －2008∼2010년 검사지의 타당도 검토를 중심으로－/국어교육학연구/2012/(44)/67~110/국어교육학회/
  10. [10] [학위논문] 박선아/2009 개정 국어과 교육과정과 미국의 국가수준 교육과정 비교 분석/석사/고려대학교 교육대학원/국어교육전공/2012
  11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] 서민철/대학수학능력시험 난도의 하향 출제가 학력 격차에 미친 영향/학습자중심교과교육연구/2013/13(2)/19~38/학습자중심교과교육학회/
  12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] 서혁/읽기(독서) 교육 체계화를 위한 텍스트 복잡도(Text Complexity) 상세화 연구 (1) －텍스트 복잡도 연구의 비판적 고찰을 중심으로-/국어교육학연구/2011/(42)/433~460/국어교육학회/
  13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] 염은열/시조 교육의 위계화를 위한 방향 탐색 -시조 형식을 중심으로-/고전문학과 교육/2004/(8)/139~158/한국고전문학교육학회/
  14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] 염철현/오바마 정부의 낙오학생방지법(NCLB) 수정안 고찰 및 시사점/교육법학연구/2012/24(2)/43~66/대한교육법학회/
  15. [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] 이순영/21세기 국어과 교육과정 개정의 방향 탐색 －미국의 ‘공통핵심기준’의 특성과 시사점 분석을 중심으로－/청람어문교육/2011/(43)/7~35/청람어문교육학회/
  16. [16] [학위논문] 이승진/고전소설 교육의 위계 적합성 연구 : 개정 7차 중등학교 교과서를 중심으로/석사/조선대학교 교육대학원/국어교육전공/2012
  17. [17] [보고서] 2004년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구/이양락/한국교육과정평가원/2005/~/한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRE 2005-1-1
  18. [18] [학술지(정기간행물)] 조용기/대입 국가고사 국어시험의 고전시가 출제 변천 양상/고전문학과 교육/2013/(25)/247~291/한국고전문학교육학회/
  19. [19] [학술지(정기간행물)] 조희정/교과서 수록 고전 제재 변천 연구 -건국 과도기부터 제7차 교육과정기까지 중등 국어 교과서를 중심으로/문학교육학/2005/(17)/281~330/한국문학교육학회/
  20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] 조희정/고전 제재의 교과서 수용 시각 검토/국어교육연구/2005/15/~/국어교육학회/
  21. [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] 조희정/교과서 수록 고전 제재 변천 연구 (1)-건국 과도기부터 제7차 교육과정기까지 문헌 제재를 중심으로/문학교육학/2006/(19)/411~444/한국문학교육학회/
  22. [22] [보고서] 텍스트 복잡도를 활용한 읽기 교육용 제재의 정합성 평가 모형 개발 연구/최숙기/한국교육과정평가원/2012/~/한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 CRE2012-7
  23. [23] [학술지(정기간행물)] 최숙기/텍스트 위계화를 위한 텍스트 질적 평가 방안 연구 －2007 개정 국어 교과서를 중심으로－/국어교육학연구/2012/(43)/487~522/국어교육학회/
  24. [24] [학술지(정기간행물)] 최숙기/국어 교사의 텍스트 복잡도 모형을 활용한 교과서 제재 정합성 평가 양상 연구/청람어문교육/2012/(46)/361~404/청람어문교육학회/
  25. [25] [기타자료] 한국교육과정평가원/PISA 2009 보도자료/한국교육과정평가원/2010/~//
  26. [26] [인터넷자원] 2010년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 문항정보/www.kice.re.kr/한국교육과정평가원///
  27. [27] [인터넷자원] 2010년도 국가수준 학업성취도평가 국어/www.kice.re.kr/한국교육과정평가원///
  28. [28] [인터넷자원] 2011년도 국가수준 학업성취도평가 고등학교 국어/www.kice.re.kr/한국교육과정평가원///
  29. [29] [단행본] Toward a New Approach to Predictioning Text Comprehensibility, In Readability: Its Past, Present, and Future/Zakaluk, B. L./International Reading Association/1988/1988~///
  30. [30] [단행본] Text Complexity/Fisher, D./International Reading Association/2012/~///
  31. [31] [단행본] The New Literacy of Online Research and Comprehension: Assessing and Preparing Students for the 21st Century with Common Core State Standards, In Reading Instructions in the Age of Common Core Standards/Leu, D. J./International Reading Association//~///
  32. [32] [단행본] Qualitative assessment of text difficulty: A Practical Guide for Teachers and Writers/Chal, J. S./Brookline Books/1996/1996~///
  33. [33] [단행본] The Cloud Dream of the Nine [Kuunmong]/Kim, Man-Choong/The Westminster Pr./1922/~///
  34. [34] [단행본] A Taxonomy of Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives/Anderson, L. W./Longman/2001/~///
  35. [35] [보고서] Report of the National Reading Panel, Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction/Natioanl Institute of Child Health and Development/U.S. Government Printing Office/2000/~/NIH Publication No. 00-4769
  36. [36] [인터넷자원] Common Core State Standard for English Language Art and Literacy in History, Social Studies, Science and Technical Subjects/www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf/National Governors Association Center for Best Practice & Council of Chief State School Officers/2012//
  37. [37] [단행본] Understanding Adult Functional Literacy, Connecting Text Features, Task Demands, and Respondent Skills/White, S/Routledge/2011/~///
  38. [38] [인터넷자원] Mining the Text: 34 Text Features That Can Ease or Obstruct Text Comprehension and Use/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2011.553023/White, S.///2012

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved