Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

Structural Relations between Processing Variables and Text Quality while Reading and Writing from Multiple Documents

SUNGMIN CHANG

인하대학교

Korea Business Review 58Vol. 5No. pp.5-40 (2023)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2023.58.5.5

Abstract

This study comprehensively and empirically examined a hypothesized model that incorporates the task model (i.e., planning and revision), documents model (i.e., intertext and integrated mental models), consideration of counterarguments as predictive variables, and text quality of essays as the dependent variable. Data were collected from 421 South Korean high school students who wrote argumentative essays using multiple documents and responded to a series of questionnaires measuring processing variables. Structural equation models were applied to analyze the data. The results indicated that the documents model predicted the participants’ text quality, while the effect of the task model was mediated by the documents model and consideration of counterargument. Notably, the paths in which planning and revision affect text quality are different. Furthermore, the intertext model and consideration of counterarguments, as opposed to the mental model, did not directly affect text quality. These findings not only contribute to the literature on multipledocument processing but also provide empirical evidence to suggest an interdisciplinary approach applicable in both language arts and content subject domains.

Keywords

Multiple-document processingMD-TRACE modelTask modelDocuments modelCounterargument

References

  1. [1] [단행본] Theoretical models and processes of reading/Anderson, R. C./International Reading Association/1985/372~384///Role of the reader’s schema in comprehension, learning and memory
  2. [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] Anmarkrud, Ø./Multiple-documents literacy : Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents/Learning and Individual Differences/2014/30/64~76//
  3. [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] Atlay, C./Instructional quality and achievement inequality : How effective is teaching in closing the social achievement gap/Learning and Instruction/2019/63/101211~//
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] Baaijen, V. M./Discovery through writing : Relationships with writing processes and text quality/Cognition and Instruction/2018/36(3)/199~223//
  5. [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] Barzilai, S./The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints/Learning and Instruction/2015/36/86~103//
  6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] Barzilai, S./Learning to integrate divergent information sources : The interplay of epistemic cognition and epistemic metacognition/Metacognition and Learning/2017/12(2)/193~232//
  7. [7] [학술지(정기간행물)] Barzilai, S./Sourcing while reading divergent expert accounts : Pathways from views of knowing to written argumentation/Instructional Science/2015/43(6)/737~766//
  8. [8] [학술지(정기간행물)] Barzilai, S./Promoting integration of multiple texts : A review of instructional approaches and practices/Educational Psychology Review/2018/30(3)/973~999//
  9. [9] [단행본] The psychology of written composition/Bereiter, C./Erlbaum/1987/~///
  10. [10] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bormuth, J. R./Readability : A new approach/Reading Research Quarterly/1966/1(3)/79~132//
  11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] Braasch, J. L. G./The discrepancy-induced source comprehension(D-ISC)model : Basic assumptions and preliminary evidence/Educational Psychologist/2017/52(3)/167~181//
  12. [12] [학술지(정기간행물)] Braasch, J. L. G./Promoting secondary school students’ evaluation of source features of multiple documents/Contemporary Educational Psychology/2013/38(3)/180~195//
  13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten, I./Developing and testing a model of direct and indirect relationships between individual differences, processing, and multiple-text comprehension/Learning and Instruction/2014/30/9~24//
  14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten, I./What really matters : The role of behavioural engagement in multiple document literacy tasks/Journal of Research in Reading/2018/41(4)/680~699//
  15. [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten, I./Modeling relations between students’ justification for knowing beliefs in science, motivation for understanding what they read in science, and science achievement/International Journal of Educational Research/2014/66/1~12//
  16. [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten, I./Task-oriented learning with multiple documents : Effects of topic familiarity, author expertise, and content relevance on document selection, processing, and use/Reading Research Quarterly/2018/53(3)/345~365//
  17. [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bråten, I./Effects of task instruction and personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts about climate change/Discourse processes/2009/47(1)/1~31//
  18. [18] [단행본] Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes/Britt, M. A./Cambridge University Press/2012/276~314///Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition
  19. [19] [학술지(정기간행물)] Burin, D. I./Metacognitive regulation contributes to digital text comprehension in e-learning/Metacognition and Learning/2020/15(3)/391~410//
  20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] Cerdán, R./The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple documents/Journal of Educational Psychology/2008/100(1)/209~222//
  21. [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장성민/학습 목적 글쓰기를 수행하는 필자의 자료 통합 예측모형 탐색 -구조방정식 모형의 적용/국어교육학연구/2017/52(2)/371~423/국어교육학회/10.20880/kler.2017.52.2.371
  22. [22] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장성민/범교과 학습 문식성 활동 성향 측정을 위한 표준화 검사 도구 개발 및 타당화/국어교육/2021/(174)/271~314/한국어교육학회/10.29401/KLE.174.8
  23. [23] [학술지(정기간행물)] 장성민/디지털 다문서 환경에서의 읽기·쓰기 : 개인차 요인, 다문서 선택과 사용, 쓰기 결과물 사이의 영향 관계/독서연구/2022/(65)/41~80/한국독서학회/
  24. [24] [학위논문] Choi, G./(The) effects of group discussion about material texts on content generation/doctoral/Korea University//2013
  25. [25] [보고서] A study on the development of evaluation criteria for the readability of educational texts/Choi, S./Korean Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation/2021/~/
  26. [26] [학술지(정기간행물)] Dale, E./A formula for predicting readability : Instructions/Educational Research Bulletin/1948/27/37~54//
  27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] De La Paz, S./Reading and writing from multiple source documents in history : Effects of strategy instruction with low to average high school writers/Contemporary Educational Psychology/2010/35(3)/174~192//
  28. [28] [학술지(정기간행물)] De Milliano, I./Patterns of cognitive self-regulation of adolescent struggling writers/Written Communication/2012/29(3)/303~325//
  29. [29] [단행본] Scale development: Theory and applications/DeVellis, R. F./Sage Publications/2016/~///
  30. [30] [학술지(정기간행물)] Du, H./Evidence use in argument writing based on multiple texts/Reading Research Quarterly/2021/56(4)/715~735//
  31. [31] [학술지(정기간행물)] Felton, M./Deliberation versus dispute : The impact of argumentative discourse goals on learning and reasoning in the science classroom/Informal Logic/2009/29(4)/417~446//
  32. [32] [학술지(정기간행물)] Flesch, R./A new readability yardstick/Journal of Applied Psychology/1948/32(3)/221~233//
  33. [33] [보고서] The role of task representation in reading to write/Flower, L./University of California, National Center for the Study of Writing and Literacy/1987/~/Technical Report, 6
  34. [34] [단행본] Cognitive processes in writing/Flower, L./Erlbaum/1980/31~50///The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints
  35. [35] [단행본] Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes/Galbraith, D./Kluwer Academic Publishers/2004/63~85///Revision in the context of different drafting strategies
  36. [36] [학술지(정기간행물)] Gebril, A./Investigating source use, discourse features, and process in integrated writing tests/Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment/2009/7(1)/47~84//
  37. [37] [학술지(정기간행물)] Gil, L./Understanding and integrating multiple science texts : Summary tasks are sometimes better than argument tasks/Reading Psychology/2010/31(1)/30~68//
  38. [38] [단행본] Uses of intertextuality in classroom and educational research/Goldman, S. R./Information Age Publishing/2004/317~352///Cognitive aspects of constructing meaning through and across multiple texts
  39. [39] [학술지(정기간행물)] Goldman, S. R./Comprehending and learning from Internet sources : Processing patterns of better and poorer learners/Reading Research Quarterly/2012/47/356~381//
  40. [40] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hagen, Å. M. M./Relationships between spontane ous note-taking, self-reported strategies and comprehension when reading multiple texts in different task conditions/Journal of Research in Reading/2014/37(S1)/S141~S157//
  41. [41] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hansen, H. L./Multiperspectivism in the novels of the Spanish Civil War/Orbis Litterarum/2011/66(2)/148~166//
  42. [42] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hayes, J. R./Modeling and remodeling writing/Written Communication/2012/29(3)/369~388//
  43. [43] [학술지(정기간행물)] Huisman, B./The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing : A meta-analysis/Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education/2019/44(6)/863~880//
  44. [44] [단행본] Testing ESL composition: A practical approach/Jacobs, H./Newbury House/1981/~///
  45. [45] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kieft, M./Writing as a learning tool : Testing the role of students’ writing strategies/European Journal of Psychology of Education/2006/21(1)/17~34//
  46. [46] [학술지(정기간행물)] Klein, P. D./Mediators and moderators in individual and collaborative writing to learn/Journal of Writing Research/2015/7(1)/201~214//
  47. [47] [단행본] Handbook of writing research/Klein, P. D./Guilford Press/2016/243~256///Writing to learn
  48. [48] [학술지(정기간행물)] Klein, P. D./The effects of discussion and persuasion writing goals on reasoning, cognitive load, and learning/Alberta Journal of Educational Research/2015/61(1)/40~64//
  49. [49] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kobayashi, K./The influence of topic knowledge, external strategy use, and college experience on students’ comprehension of controversial texts/Learning and Individual Differences/2009/19(1)/130~134//
  50. [50] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lee, H. Y./The role of relevance determinations in multiple text reading and writing : an investigation of the MD-TRACE/Discourse Processes/2023/60(1)/1~31//
  51. [51] [학위논문] Lee, Y./A study on the aspects of text construction through discourse synthesis: Focusing on the relationship between task representation in writing and text construction/doctoral/Yonsei University//2013
  52. [52] [학술지(정기간행물)] Leki, I./"Completely different worlds" : EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses/TSOL Quarterly/1997/31(1)/39~69//
  53. [53] [학술지(정기간행물)] Leijten, M./Keystroke logging in writing research : Using Inputlog to analyze and visualize writing processes/Written Communication/2013/30(3)/358~392//
  54. [54] [학술지(정기간행물)] Limpo, T./Children’s high-level writing skills : Development of planning and revising and their contribution to writing quality/British Journal of Educational Psychology/2014/84(2)/177~193//
  55. [55] [학술지(정기간행물)] List, A./Investigating the cognitive affective engagement model of learning from multiple texts : A structural equation modeling approach/Reading Research Quarterly/2021/56(4)/781~817//
  56. [56] [학술지(정기간행물)] List, A./Cognitive affective engagement model of multiple source use/Educational Psychologist/2017/52(3)/182~199//
  57. [57] [학술지(정기간행물)] List, A./Toward an integrated framework of multiple text use/Educational Psychologist/2019/54(1)/20~39//
  58. [58] [학술지(정기간행물)] List, A./Understanding students’ conceptions of task assignments/Contemporary Educational Psychology/2019/59/101801~//
  59. [59] [학술지(정기간행물)] Mateos, M./Reading and writing to learn in secondary education : Online processing activity and written products in summarizing and synthesizing tasks/Reading and Writing/2008/21(7)/675~697//
  60. [60] [학술지(정기간행물)] Mateos, M./Learning paths in synthesis writing: Which learning path contributes most to which learning outcome?/Instructional Science/2020/48(2)/137~157//
  61. [61] [학술지(정기간행물)] McCrudden, M. T./The effects of topic familiarity, author expertise, and content relevance on Norwegian students’ document selection : A mixed methods study/Journal of Educational Psychology/2016/108(2)/147~162//
  62. [62] [학술지(정기간행물)] Muhonen, H./Quality of educational dialogue and association with students’ academic performance/Learning and Instruction/2018/55/67~79//
  63. [63] [학술지(정기간행물)] Muñoz, B./Typing versus thinking aloud when reading : Implications for computer-based assessment and training tools/Behavior Research Methods/2006/38(2)/211~217//
  64. [64] [학술지(정기간행물)] Myhill, D./More than just error correction : Students’ perspectives on their revision processes during writing/Written Communication/2007/24(4)/323~343//
  65. [65] [학술지(정기간행물)] Nelson, M. M./The nature of feedback : How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance/Instructional Science/2009/37(4)/375~401//
  66. [66] [학술지(정기간행물)] Nussbaum, E. M./Critical questions and argument stratagems : A framework for enhancing and analyzing students’ reasoning practices/Journal of the Learning Sciences/2011/20(3)/443~488//
  67. [67] [단행본] International perspectives on teaching rival histories: Pedagogical responses to contested narratives and the history wars/Nygren, T./Palgrave Macmillan/2017/207~228///Promoting a historiographic gaze through multiperspectivity in history teaching
  68. [68] [학위논문] Oh, E./A study on the educational design and development of multiple-document (MD) comprehension: Focusing on processes and strategies of exploration, integration, and critical evaluation/doctoral/Ewha Womans University//2020
  69. [69] [학술지(정기간행물)] Primor, L./Measuring multiple text integration : A review/Frontiers in Psychology/2018/9/2294~//
  70. [70] [학술지(정기간행물)] Richter, T./Comprehension of multiple documents with conflicting information : A two-step model of validation/Educational Psychologist/2017/52(3)/148~166//
  71. [71] [학술지(정기간행물)] Rijlaarsdam, G./Observation of peers in learning to write : Practise and research/Journal of Writing Research/2008/1(1)/53~83//
  72. [72] [단행본] Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes/Rijlaarsdam, G./Springer/2004/189~207///The study of revision as a writing process and as a learning-to-write process
  73. [73] [학술지(정기간행물)] Rouet, J. F./RESOLV : Readers’ representation of reading contexts and tasks/Educational Psychologist/2017/52(3)/200~215//
  74. [74] [학술지(정기간행물)] Rouet, J. F./The influence of surface and deep cues on primary and secondary school students’ assessment of relevance in Web menus/Learning and Instruction/2011/21(2)/205~219//
  75. [75] [학술지(정기간행물)] Rouet, J. F./Effects of information search tasks on the comprehension of instructional text/Discourse Processes/2001/31(2)/163~186//
  76. [76] [학술지(정기간행물)] Sedova, K./Do those who talk more learn more? The relationship between student classroom talk and student achievement/Learning and Instruction/2019/63/101217~//
  77. [77] [학술지(정기간행물)] Stadtler, M./The art of reading in a knowledge society : Commentary on the special issue on models of multiple text comprehension/Educational Psychologist/2017/52(3)/225~231//
  78. [78] [학술지(정기간행물)] Stang Lund, E./Direct and indirect effects of textual and individual factors on source-content integration when reading about a socio-scientific issue/Reading and Writing/2019/32(2)/335~356//
  79. [79] [학술지(정기간행물)] VanLehn, K./A model of the self-explanation effect/Journal of the Learning Sciences/1992/2(1)/1~59//
  80. [80] [단행본] Assessing writing/Weigle, S. C./Cambridge University Press/2002/~///
  81. [81] [단행본] Communicative language testing/Weir, C. J./Prentice Hall Regents/1990/~///
  82. [82] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wiley, J./Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in internet science inquiry tasks/American Educational Research Journal/2009/46(4)/1060~1106//
  83. [83] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wiley, J./Constructing arguments from multiple sources : Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text/Journal of Educational Psychology/1999/91(2)/301~311//
  84. [84] [단행본] Writing and motivation/Zimmerman, B. J./Elsevier/2007/51~69///A writer’s discipline: The development of self-regulatory skills

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved