Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

Comparisons of In-service and Pre-service Korean Language Teachers’ Writing Assessments Using an Empathizing Task

Jang Eunju Park, Young-min

한국교원대학교 한국어문교육연구소 한국교원대학교

Korea Business Review 49Vol. 4No. pp.87-108 (2014)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2014.49.4.87

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine writing assessment according to raters’ career length and gender. A total of 83 teachers were asked to rate essays written by students following completion guidelines in an empathizing task. The results showed that writing assessments differed by teachers’ career length and by assessment criteria, and that assessments changed based on the gender of both the students and raters, thus revealing gender bias and same-sex depreciation. These outcomes suggest the following: First, teachers should control writing task criteria. Second, rater gender should be controlled in large-scale writing assessments. Lastly, teachers should examine and reflect on their own writing assessment skills even if they have sufficient teaching experience.

Keywords

writing assessmentempathic essay writingrater biasrater’s genderpre-service Korean language teachersin-service Korean language teachers

References

  1. [1] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bouwer, R./Effect of genre on the generalizability of writing scores/Language Testing/2014/4/1~18//
  2. [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] Eckes, T./Operational rater types in writing assessment : Linking rater cognition to rater behavior/Language Assessment Quarterly/2012/9/270~292//
  3. [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] Etaugh, C./Evaluating competence of women and men/Psychology of Women Quarterly/1988/12(2)/191~200//
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] Francis, B./University lecturers’ perceptions of gender and undergraduate writing/British Journal of Sociology of Education/2003/24(3)/357~373//
  5. [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] Harari, H./Name stereotypes and teachers’ expectations/Journal of Educational Psychology/1973/65(2)/222~225//
  6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] Haswell, R. H./Gender bias and critique of student writing/Assessing writing/1996/3(1)/31~83//
  7. [7] [학술지(정기간행물)] Klein, K. J./Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy : When it pays to understand/Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin/2001/27(6)/720~730//
  8. [8] [단행본] Many-faceted Rasch Measurement/Linacre, J. M./MESA Press/1989/~///
  9. [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] Mertler, C. A./Secondary teachers’ assessment literacy : Does classroom experience make a difference?/American secondary education/2005/33(2)/49~64//
  10. [10] [학술지(정기간행물)] Peterson, S./Fourth, sixth, and eighth graders’ preferred writing topics and identification of gender markers in stories/The Elementary School Journal/2000/101(1)/79~100//
  11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] Peterson S./Sixth grade teachers’ written comments on student writing : Genre and gender influences/Written Communication/2006/23(1)/36~62//
  12. [12] [단행본] Gender Issues in the Teaching of English/Roen, D. G./Boynton/1992/126~141///Gender and teacher response to student writing
  13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] Scheuer, N./Children’s gendered ways of talking about learning to write/Journal of Writing Research/2011/3(3)/181~216//
  14. [14] [학술지(정기간행물)] Schulte-Rüther, M./Gender differences in brain networks supporting empathy/Neuroimage/2008/42(1)/393~403//
  15. [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] Toussaint, L./Gender differences in the relationship between empathy and forgiveness/The Journal of social psychology/2005/145(6)/673~685//
  16. [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wiseman, C. S./Rater effects : Ego engagement in rater decision-making/Assessing Writing/2012/17(3)/150~173//
  17. [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] Whithaus, C./Keyboarding compared with handwriting on a high-stakes writing assessment/Assessing Writing/2008/13(1)/4~25//
  18. [18] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영민/예비국어교사의 쓰기 평가 효능감 분석/청람어문교육/2010/18(42)/181~207/청람어문교육학회/
  19. [19] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영민/국어교사의 쓰기 평가 효능감 분석/청람어문교육/2011/12(44)/121~146/청람어문교육학회/
  20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영민/현직 국어교사와 예비 국어교사의 쓰기평가 지식의 차이 분석/작문연구/2013/33(19)/331~352/한국작문학회/
  21. [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영민/현직 국어교사와 예비 국어교사의 쓰기 평가 비교 연구/교육과정평가연구/2009/12(1)/123~143/한국교육과정평가원/
  22. [22] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영민/예비 국어교사의 성별 및 학생 성별 인식에 따른 평가 차이 분석/교육과정평가연구/2010/13(2)/239~258/한국교육과정평가원/
  23. [23] [학위논문] 박종임/국어교사의 쓰기 평가 특성 연구/박사/한국교원대학교 대학원/국어교육전공/2013
  24. [24] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박종임/Rasch 모형을 활용한 국어교사의 채점 일관성 변화 양상 및 원인 분석 -중학생 서사문 채점을 중심으로-/우리어문연구/2011/30(39)/301~335/우리어문학회/
  25. [25] [학위논문] 배영태/반성적 쓰기가 고등학생의 수필 쓰기 능력 및 태도에 미치는 영향/석사/한국교원대학교 교육대학원/국어교육/2010
  26. [26] [단행본] 무소유/법정/범우사/1999/~///
  27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] 정미경/국어교사의 성별에 따른 쓰기평가 특성 분석/교원교육/2011/27(4)/73~93/교육연구원/
  28. [28] [학술지(정기간행물)] 최숙기/논설문 평가에 나타난 국어교사의 평가 특성 및 편향 분석/교육과정평가연구/2011/14(1)/201~228/한국교육과정평가원/

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved