Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Reflective Attitude in/on Conversation

Min, Byeonggon Park Seong Seog

서울대학교 서울대학교

Korea Business Review 52Vol. 4No. pp.303-342 (2017)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2017.52.4.303

Abstract

This study aims to define the concept of Reflective Attitude in/on Conversation (RAC), based on a review of discussions in the field of reflective education, and develop a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure RAC. In the preliminary stage, three constructs, namely, Thoughtful Action (TA), Content/Process Reflection (CPR), and Premise Reflection (PR), were established, and content validity was verified by five specialists. In the exploratory stage, 467 students, who were in their 1st or 2nd year of school, were sampled from four high schools. In the confirmatory stage, 1,055 students who were in their 1st or 2nd year of school were sampled from 11 high schools across our two sessions. The results of exploratory factor analysis show that 12 among 27 preliminary items have communality greater than 0.3, factor loading to the hypothesized construct greater than 0.4, and factor loading to un-hypothesized constructs lower than 0.3. Further, the 3-factor-model’s Qui-square test does not reject the null hypothesis that there are only three factors, while the 2-factor-model’s Qui-square test rejects the null hypothesis that there are only two factors. The 3-factor-model also shows suitable TLI value (.979), while the 4-factor-model revealed a highly saturated TLI value. The results of confirmatory factor analysis with our first confirmatory stage samples (568 students), show that two items among 12 are not reliable, and NFI (.849) and CFI (.879), among five model fitness indices, do not satisfy their criteria (>.900). After revising the two unreliable items, the results of confirmatory factor analysis with our second confirmatory stage samples (487 students), reveal that all the 12 items are reliable, and although NFI (.897) still does not satisfy the criterion, CFI (.912), GFI (.936), RMR (.037), and RMSEA (.076) satisfy their criteria. In the conclusion, we suggest some implications of measured results, and some further research directions.

Keywords

대화 성찰 태도사려 깊은 행동내용 성찰과정 성찰전제 성찰비판적 성찰성찰성찰적 대화 교육화법 교육

References

  1. [1] [학술지(정기간행물)] 김정란/반성적 말하기 지도 방법 연구 -ALACT 교수 모형 적용을 중심으로-/화법연구/2014/(25)/75~101/한국화법학회/
  2. [2] [단행본] 심리평가의 이해와 활용/박경/학지사/2017/~///
  3. [3] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영민/반성적 쓰기를 활용한 작문 평가 방안/새국어교육/2006/(73)/33~60/한국국어교육학회/
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박영민/반성적 쓰기가 중학생의 설명문 쓰기 수행에 미치는 영향/국어교육/2008/(125)/137~162/한국어교육학회/
  5. [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박창균/화자의 스피치 수행에 대한 반성적 사고 양상 연구/화법연구/2015/(30)/217~248/한국화법학회/
  6. [6] [학술지(정기간행물)] 서종훈/말하기 수행에 드러난 반성적 사고 양상 - 고1 학습자들의 공적인 자리에서의 말하기를 중심으로/새국어교육/2009/(83)/239~260/한국국어교육학회/
  7. [7] [단행본] 요인분석의 기초/이순묵/교육과학사/2000/~///
  8. [8] [학위논문] 장지혜/성찰적 사고를 위한 비평적 에세이 쓰기 교육 연구/석사/서울대학교 대학원/국어교육과 국어교육전공/2013
  9. [9] [학술지(정기간행물)] 최홍원/성찰적 사고의 문학교육적 구도 -도산십이곡과 어부사시사를 대상으로/문학교육학/2006/(21)/385~423/한국문학교육학회/
  10. [10] [학위논문] 최홍원/시조의 성찰적 사고 교육 연구/박사/서울대학교 대학원/국어교육/2008
  11. [11] [단행본] A Handbook of Social Psychology/Allport, G. W./Clark university press/1935/798~844///Attitudes
  12. [12] [단행본] Survey research/Backstrom, C. H./Northwestern University Press/1963/~///
  13. [13] [학술지(정기간행물)] Bain, J. D./Using journal writing to enhance student teachers’ reflectivity during field experience placements/Teachers and Teaching/1999/5(1)/51~73//
  14. [14] [단행본] 하우 위 싱크: 과학적 사고의 방법과 교육/Dewey, J./학이시습/2011/~///
  15. [15] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hatton, N./Reflection in teacher education : Towards definition and implementation/Teaching and Teacher Education/1995/11(1)/33~49//
  16. [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] Jay, J. K./Capturing complexity : A typology of reflective practice for teacher education/Teaching and Teacher Education/2002/18(1)/73~85//
  17. [17] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kember, D./Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking/Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education/2000/25(4)/381~395//
  18. [18] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kember, D./A four-category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work/Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education/2008/33(4)/369~379//
  19. [19] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kreber, C./Reflection on teaching and epistemological structure : reflective and critically reflective processes in ‘pure/soft’ and ‘pure/hard’ fields/Higher Education/2009/57(4)/509~531//
  20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] Larrivee, B./Development of a tool to assess teachers’ level of reflective practice/Reflective Practice/2008/9(3)/341~360//
  21. [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lau, K./Assessing reflection in English enhancement courses : teachers’ views and development of a holistic framework/Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education/2015/41(6)/854~868//
  22. [22] [학술지(정기간행물)] McAlpine, L./Reflection on teaching : Types and goals of reflection/Educational Research and Evaluation/2004/10(4-6)/337~363//
  23. [23] [단행본] Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood/Mezirow, J./Jossey-Bass/1990/1~20///How critical reflection triggers transformative learning
  24. [24] [단행본] Transformative dimensions of adult learning/Mezirow, J./Jossey-Bass/1991/~///
  25. [25] [학술지(정기간행물)] Rogers, R. R./Reflection in higer education : A concept analysis/Innovative higher education/2001/26(1)/37~57//
  26. [26] [단행본] The Reflective Practitioner : How professionals think in action/Schön, D. A./Basic Books/1983/~///
  27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] Wald, H. S./Fostering and evaluating reflective capacity in medical education : developing the REFLECT rubric for assessing reflective writing/Academic Medicine/2012/87(1)/41~50//

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved