Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review

Edited by: Hyoung-Goo Kang Print ISSN: 2951-3596 Online ISSN: 2951-360X © THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. Frequency: Quarterly (four times per year): February 28, May 31, August 31, and November 30
Cover
Latest Issue Vol. 60, No. 5 2025

Article Info

Another Possibility of Science Writing -Analysis of 『Seonghosaseol』 and 『Uisanmundab』

Kim, Hyeyoun

서울대학교

Korea Business Review 46No. pp.275-306 (2013)

DOI: 10.20880/kler.2013..46.275

Abstract

This thesis aims at examining the way of science writing of 『Seonghosaseol』 and 『Uisanmundab』 in terms of rhetorical devices and considering what they hold for current sciece writing. The reason why I intend to take these two works as analysis object is related with the socio-cultural circumstances of 18th century in Joseon dynasty. 『Seonghosaseol』 was written before large inflow of western knowledge and information, otherwise 『Uisanmundab』 is written during this period. So by examining these two works we can compare and analyze what kind of academic development they achieve between traditional study and western science, and what kind of writing process they choose. First, in the case of 『Seonghosaseol』, it is a prototype of encyclopedic writing and at the same time it reflected the author’s opinion in the direct way and often expose his own experience. Although it included quite a mistake in scientific inferences, it also became a good reference for activities of the students under learning in that he put out bold inferences. Considering that those kind of bold inferences couldn’t be put out in 19th century, 『Seonghosaseol』 deserves high marks for putting out its own inference without being sunk by knowledge or information. in the case of 『Uisanmundab』, it put out more epoch-making, logical and elaborate inferences. Moreover it could make more persuasive and dense disputes by using narrative structure. Both 『Seonghosaseol』 and 『Uisanmundab』showed verbalizing in constructing of the statement. This is a diffrentiating feature from nominalizing which is considered as a standard expression in the modern science writing since Newton. Verbalizing in the expression shows the progress itself of acting and circumstance rather than its concept. 『Seonghosaseol』 and 『Uisanmundab』 suggest a possibility of an alternative on the problems which modern science writing shows such a rhetoric of objectification or delivery of fait accompli.

Keywords

성호사설의산문답과학 글쓰기과학 수사학조선 천문학과학 논쟁명사화동사화과학 교과서과학 산문

References

  1. [1] [학술지(정기간행물)] 강병수/성호 이익의 『성호사설』의 세계 －｢천지문｣의 항목과 내용 검토－/동국사학/2011/50(50)/127~171/동국역사문화연구소/
  2. [2] [학술지(정기간행물)] 길진숙/홍대용의 의산문답(山問答) 읽기와 문학 교육적 성찰/우리어문연구/2007/(29)/165~199/우리어문학회/
  3. [3] [단행본] 홍대용의 실학과 18세기 북학사상/김문용/예문서원/2005/~//한국철학총서 24/
  4. [4] [학술지(정기간행물)] 박수밀/18세기 새로운 글쓰기의 대응 양상과 의미/한국언어문화/2005/27(27)/399~424/한국언어문화학회/
  5. [5] [학술지(정기간행물)] 안세현/문체반정을 둘러싼 글쓰기와 문체 논쟁/어문논집/2006/0(54)/137~172/민족어문학회/
  6. [6] [단행본] 과학의 수사학/앨런 그로스/궁리/2007/~///
  7. [7] [단행본] 고등학교 과학/이성묵/(주)금성출판사/2012/~///
  8. [8] [학위논문] 오철우/과학 대중화와 수사학 : 1940-50년대 가모브의 우주론 삼부작에 대한 사례 연구/석사/서울대학교 대학원/과학사및과학철학/2006
  9. [9] [단행본] 星湖全集 (한국문집총간 199권)/이익/민족문화추진회/1997/~///
  10. [10] [단행본] 星湖僿說精選/이익/현대실학사/1998/~///
  11. [11] [학술지(정기간행물)] 임종태/17·18세기 서양 과학의 유입과 분야설의 변화/한국사상사학/2003/21(21)/391~416/한국사상사학회/
  12. [12] [단행본] 고등학교 과학/전동렬/대한교과서(주)/2012/61~82///
  13. [13] [학위논문] 전용훈/조선후기 서양천문학과 전통천문학의 갈등과 융화/박사/서울대학교 대학원/과학사및과학철학/2004
  14. [14] [단행본] 18세기 조선지식인의 발견/정민/휴머니스트/2007/57~132///
  15. [15] [학위논문] 정 혁/물리개념을 주제로 한 11학년 학생의 과학 글쓰기 분석: 쓰기 과제의 유형에 따른 차이를 중심으로/석사/서울대학교 대학원/물리/2003
  16. [16] [학술지(정기간행물)] 진재교/19세기 京華世族의 讀書文化 -洪奭周 家門을 중심으로-/漢文學報/2007/16(1)/137~168/우리한문학회/
  17. [17] [단행본] 의산문답/홍대용/지만지/2008/~///
  18. [18] [학술지(정기간행물)] Banks, D./On the historical origins of nominalized process in scientific text/English for Specific Purposes/2005//347~357//
  19. [19] [단행본] Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power/Halliday, M. A. K./University of Pittsburgh Press/1993/~///
  20. [20] [학술지(정기간행물)] Hartley, J./Style and Substance in Psychology: Are Influential Articles More Readable than Less Influential Ones?/Social Studies of Science/2002/32(2)/321~334//
  21. [21] [학술지(정기간행물)] Honig, S./What Do Children Write in Science? A Study of the Genre Set in a Primary Science Classroom/Written Communication/2010/27(1)/87~119//
  22. [22] [학술지(정기간행물)] Kelly, G. J./How Students Argue Scientific Claims: A Rhetorical-Semantic Analysis/Applied Linguistics/2003/24(1)/28~55//
  23. [23] [학술지(정기간행물)] Lehman, S./Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text/Contemporary Educational Psychology/2007/32(4)/569~587//
  24. [24] [학술지(정기간행물)] Massoudi, M./Can Scientific Writing Be Creative?/Journal of Science Education & Technology/2003/12(2)/115~128//
  25. [25] [단행본] The Rhetoric of the human sciences : language and argument in scholarship and public affairs/Nelson, J. S./University of Wisconsin Press/1987/~///
  26. [26] [인터넷자원] Opticks/http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Opticks_(2nd_Ed)/The_First_Book/Part_I#Prop._I._Theor._I/Newton, Isaac///2008
  27. [27] [학술지(정기간행물)] Norman, J. G./Consistent naming in scientific writing: sound advice or shibboleth?/English for Specific Purposes/2003/22(2)/113~//
  28. [28] [학술지(정기간행물)] Zhihui, F./Scientific Literacy: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective/Science Education/2005/89(2)/335~347//

Korea Business Review · THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

Print ISSN 2951-3596 · Online ISSN 2951-360X

Privacy PolicyTerms of UseContact UsKMA Homepage

TEL : 010-2672-3919 EMAIL : kbr2editor@gmail.com 계좌번호 : 신한 140-009-175743 예금주 : (사)한국경영학회 COPYRIGHT ⓒ 2023 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION. All rights reserved